Suppr超能文献

内隐和外显情节反事实思维的神经差异。

Neural differences between internal and external episodic counterfactual thoughts.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Levine Science Research Center, 308 Research Drive, C03E, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Department of Philosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 19;377(1866):20210337. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0337. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Abstract

Episodic counterfactual thoughts (eCFT) consist of imagining alternative outcomes to past experiences. A common sub-class of eCFT- eCFT-involves imagining how past negative experiences could have been , either because one could have done something differently (internal) or because something about the circumstances could have been different (external). Although previous neuroimaging research has shown that the brain's default mode network (DMN) supports upward eCFT, it is unclear how it is differentially recruited during internal versus external upward eCFT. We collected functional magnetic resonance imaging data while participants remembered negative autobiographical memories, generated either internal or external upward eCFT for the memory, and then rated the plausibility, perceived control and difficulty of eCFT generation. Both internal and external eCFT engaged midline regions of cingulate cortex, a central node of the DMN. Most activity differentiating eCFT, however, occurred outside the DMN. External eCFT engaged cuneus, angular gyrus and precuneus, whereas internal eCFT engaged posterior cingulate and precentral gyrus. Angular gyrus and precuneus were additionally sensitive to perceived plausibility of external eCFT, while postcentral gyrus and insula activity scaled with perceived plausibility of internal eCFT. These results highlight the key brain regions that might be involved in cases of maladaptive mental simulations. This article is part of the theme issue 'Thinking about possibilities: mechanisms, ontogeny, functions and phylogeny'.

摘要

情景性反事实思维(eCFT)包括想象过去经历的替代结果。eCFT 的一个常见子类是 eCFT-involves,它涉及想象过去的负面经历本来可以怎样,要么是因为一个人本来可以做些不同的事情(内部),要么是因为情况本来可以有所不同(外部)。尽管以前的神经影像学研究表明,大脑的默认模式网络(DMN)支持向上的 eCFT,但不清楚它在内部与外部向上的 eCFT 期间如何被不同地招募。当参与者回忆起消极的自传体记忆时,我们收集了功能磁共振成像数据,然后为记忆生成内部或外部的向上 eCFT,并对 eCFT 生成的可能性、感知控制和难度进行评分。内部和外部的 eCFT 都参与了扣带皮层的中线区域,这是 DMN 的一个核心节点。然而,区分 eCFT 的大多数活动发生在 DMN 之外。外部 eCFT 涉及楔前叶、角回和楔叶,而内部 eCFT 涉及后扣带回和中央前回。角回和楔前叶对外部 eCFT 的感知可能性也更为敏感,而后中央回和岛叶的活动与内部 eCFT 的感知可能性呈比例关系。这些结果突出了可能涉及适应不良心理模拟的关键大脑区域。本文是“思考可能性:机制、个体发生、功能和系统发生”主题问题的一部分。

相似文献

1
Neural differences between internal and external episodic counterfactual thoughts.内隐和外显情节反事实思维的神经差异。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 19;377(1866):20210337. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0337. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Neural activity associated with repetitive simulation of episodic counterfactual thoughts.与情景反事实思维重复模拟相关的神经活动。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
Remembering and imagining alternative versions of the personal past.回忆和想象个人过去的替代版本。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Feb;110:170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

3
Phenomenology of counterfactual thinking is dampened in anxious individuals.反事实思维的现象学在焦虑个体中减弱。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Dec;34(8):1737-1745. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1802230. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI.fMRIPrep:用于功能磁共振成像的强大预处理流水线。
Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):111-116. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验