Yan Chao, Li Ao, Hao Yiran, Zhang Xiaozhao, Guo Yihan, Gu Yixuan, Wang Yinghui, Wen Ya, Tian Lei, Jie Ying
Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2022 Oct 26;14:1919-1925. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S378612. eCollection 2022.
To explore the relationship between symptomatic dry eye and circadian typology in college students.
This study included 269 students from 3 Chinese universities. All participants completed the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, the morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ), and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) questionnaire. Participants were grouped into 3 types by the reduced MEQ (rMEQ) score:E-Type, N-Type, and M-Type. All these parameters were then analyzed for the effect on the severity of dry eye.
The occurrence rates of poor sleep quality (PSQI>5) and symptomatic dry eye (OSDI > 13) in the college students were 53.2% and 40.2%, respectively. The distribution of the circadian typology differed significantly among the college students with different dry eye severities ( = 59.44, P = 0. 000), and E-type was associated with the most severe dry eye symptoms. The OSDI and PSQI scores were both significantly different among college students with different chronotypes (F = 22.14, P = 0.000; F = 15.21, P = 0.000; respectively). For both scores, the E-type scored the highest, followed by N-type, and M-type was the lowest. The circadian typology was an independent factor for dry eye. The risk of E-Type was 6.99 times higher than that of M-Type (P = 0.000), and the risk of N-types was 3.23 times higher than that of M-Type (P = 0.000). Sleep quality was also an independent risk factor for dry eye (P = 0.000). Gender and awareness of dry eye were not risk factors for dry eye.
The severity of dry eye symptoms and sleep quality were associated with different circadian typologies. The more the circadian preference tended to be E-type, the worse the sleep quality and the more serious dry eye symptoms would appear.
探讨大学生症状性干眼与昼夜节律类型之间的关系。
本研究纳入了来自3所中国大学的269名学生。所有参与者均完成了眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷、晨型-夜型问卷(MEQ)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)问卷。参与者根据简化的MEQ(rMEQ)得分分为3种类型:E型、N型和M型。然后分析所有这些参数对干眼严重程度的影响。
大学生睡眠质量差(PSQI>5)和症状性干眼(OSDI>13)的发生率分别为53.2%和40.2%。不同干眼严重程度的大学生之间昼夜节律类型分布存在显著差异(χ²=59.44,P=0.000),且E型与最严重的干眼症状相关。不同昼夜节律类型的大学生OSDI和PSQI得分均存在显著差异(F=22.14,P=0.000;F=15.21,P=0.000)。对于这两个得分,E型得分最高,其次是N型,M型最低。昼夜节律类型是干眼的独立因素。E型的风险比M型高6.99倍(P=0.000),N型的风险比M型高3.23倍(P=0.000)。睡眠质量也是干眼的独立危险因素(P=0.000)。性别和干眼知晓情况不是干眼的危险因素。
干眼症状的严重程度和睡眠质量与不同的昼夜节律类型有关。昼夜节律偏好越倾向于E型,睡眠质量越差,干眼症状越严重。