• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的双重资格受益人的长期服务和支持的使用。

Use of long-term services and supports among dual-eligible beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

机构信息

Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):432-442. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18115. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.18115
PMID:36334026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9957784/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To respect people's preference for aging in place and control costs, many state Medicaid programs have enacted policies to expand home and community-based services as an alternative to nursing facility care. However, little is known about the use of Medicaid long-term services and supports (LTSS) at a national level, particularly among dual-eligible beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

METHODS

Using Medicare and Medicaid claims of 30 states from 2016, we focused on dual-eligible beneficiaries 65 years or older with ADRD and described their use of any form of LTSS and sub-types of LTSS (home-based, community-based, and nursing facility services) across states.

RESULTS

We found that 80.5% of dual-eligible beneficiaries with ADRD received some form of Medicaid LTSS in 2016. The most common LTSS setting was nursing facility (46.7%), followed by home (31.5%) and community (12.2%). There was sizeable state variation in the percentage of dual-eligible beneficiaries with ADRD who used any form of LTSS (ranging from 61% in Maine to 96% in Montana). The type of LTSS used also varied widely across states. For example, home-based service use ranged from 9% in Maine, Arizona, and South Dakota to 62% in Oregon. Nursing facility services were the most common type of LTSS in most states. However, home-based service use exceeded nursing facility use in Oregon, Alaska, and California.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest substantially different use of LTSS across states among dual-eligible beneficiaries with ADRD. Given the importance of LTSS for this population and their families, a deeper understanding of state LTSS policies and other factors that contribute to wide state variation in LTSS use will be necessary to improve access to LTSS across states.

摘要

背景

为了尊重人们选择就地老化的意愿并控制成本,许多州的医疗补助计划已制定政策,扩大家庭和社区为基础的服务,以替代护理院护理。然而,在全国范围内,特别是在患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的双重资格受益人中,对于医疗补助长期服务和支持(LTSS)的使用情况知之甚少。

方法

我们使用了 2016 年来自 30 个州的医疗保险和医疗补助索赔数据,重点关注 65 岁或以上患有 ADRD 的双重资格受益人,并描述了他们在各州使用任何形式的 LTSS 以及 LTSS 的亚型(家庭、社区和护理院服务)的情况。

结果

我们发现,2016 年有 80.5%的患有 ADRD 的双重资格受益人获得了某种形式的医疗补助 LTSS。最常见的 LTSS 场所是护理院(46.7%),其次是家庭(31.5%)和社区(12.2%)。在使用任何形式的 LTSS 的双重资格受益人中,各州之间存在相当大的差异(从缅因州的 61%到蒙大拿州的 96%)。使用的 LTSS 类型也在各州之间差异很大。例如,缅因州、亚利桑那州和南达科他州的家庭服务使用率为 9%,而俄勒冈州为 62%。在大多数州,护理院服务是最常见的 LTSS 类型。然而,在俄勒冈州、阿拉斯加和加利福尼亚州,家庭服务的使用量超过了护理院。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,患有 ADRD 的双重资格受益人在各州之间对 LTSS 的使用情况存在很大差异。考虑到 LTSS 对这一人群及其家庭的重要性,需要更深入地了解州 LTSS 政策以及其他导致 LTSS 使用在各州之间存在广泛差异的因素,以便在各州之间改善 LTSS 的可及性。

相似文献

1
Use of long-term services and supports among dual-eligible beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的双重资格受益人的长期服务和支持的使用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):432-442. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18115. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
2
Health Care Expenditures After Initiating Long-term Services and Supports in the Community Versus in a Nursing Facility.在社区与护理机构开始接受长期服务和支持后的医疗保健支出。
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000491.
3
State-Level Adverse Outcomes Among Long-Term Services and Supports Users With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者的长期护理和支持用户的州级不良结局。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):271-279. doi: 10.1177/10775587231207668. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
4
Payment rates for personal care assistants and the use of long-term services and supports among those dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格者中个人护理助理的支付费率以及长期服务与支持的使用情况。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec;49(6):1812-31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12249. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
5
Use of Home-Based Clinical Care and Long-Term Services and Supports Among Homebound Older Adults.居家老年人的居家临床护理和长期服务与支持的使用情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jul;24(7):1002-1006.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
Integration of Medicare and Medicaid for dually eligible beneficiaries: A focus group study examining beneficiaries' early experiences in California's dual financial alignment demonstration.医疗保险和医疗补助为双重合格受益人整合:一项聚焦加利福尼亚州双重财务调整示范项目中受益人的早期经验的焦点小组研究。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jan;11(1):130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Nursing home admissions for persons with dementia: Role of home- and community-based services.疗养院收治痴呆症患者:家庭和社区服务的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1168-1178. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13715. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
9
Integrated Home- and Community-Based Services Improve Community Survival Among Independence at Home Medicare Beneficiaries Without Increasing Medicaid Costs.综合性居家和社区服务可提高居家 Medicare 受益人的社区生存率,而不会增加医疗补助成本。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1495-1501. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15968. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
Medicaid home and community-based services spending for older adults: Is there a "woodwork" effect?医疗补助计划用于老年人居家和社区服务的支出:是否存在“潜在需求涌现”效应?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Oct;71(10):3143-3151. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18478. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalizations and Disparities Among Older Adults With Dementia Before and During the Pandemic.大流行之前及期间患有痴呆症的老年人的门诊护理敏感型住院情况及差异
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19573.
2
Leveraging data, technology, and policy to address disparities for persons living with Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias.利用数据、技术和政策来解决阿尔茨海默病及与阿尔茨海默病相关的痴呆症患者的差异问题。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70186. doi: 10.1002/alz.70186.
3
Home- and community-based care in the new generation of Medicaid administrative data.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use Patterns of Medicaid Home and Community Based Services Among Medicare/Medicaid Beneficiaries With Dementia.患有痴呆症的医疗保险/医疗补助受益人群中医疗补助居家和社区服务的使用模式
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;9:708402. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.708402. eCollection 2021.
2
Family Care Availability And Implications For Informal And Formal Care Used By Adults With Dementia In The US.美国家庭对老年痴呆症患者的护理可用性及其对非正式和正式护理的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Sep;40(9):1359-1367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00280.
3
Nursing home admissions for persons with dementia: Role of home- and community-based services.
新一代医疗补助行政数据中的居家和社区照护
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2025;25(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10742-024-00325-6. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Key Informants' Visions and Solutions to Improve Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults and Persons With Dementia.关键信息提供者对改善老年人和痴呆症患者居家及社区服务的愿景与解决方案
Res Aging. 2025 Feb;47(2):103-115. doi: 10.1177/01640275241269991. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
5
State-Level Adverse Outcomes Among Long-Term Services and Supports Users With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者的长期护理和支持用户的州级不良结局。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):271-279. doi: 10.1177/10775587231207668. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
疗养院收治痴呆症患者:家庭和社区服务的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1168-1178. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13715. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
4
State Medicaid Financing and Access to Large Assisted Living Settings for Medicare-Medicaid Dual-Eligibles.州医疗补助计划的筹资情况以及医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格获得者入住大型辅助生活设施的情况。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Feb;79(1):69-77. doi: 10.1177/1077558720987666. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.医疗保险居家和社区长期服务在双重资格人群中的护理院护理的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):973-982. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573.
6
State Variability in the Prevalence and Healthcare Utilization of Assisted Living Residents with Dementia.痴呆症辅助生活居民的患病率和医疗保健利用的州内变异性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1504-1511. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16410. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
A National Examination Of Long-Term Care Setting, Outcomes, And Disparities Among Elderly Dual Eligibles.老年双重资格者在长期护理环境、结果和差异方面的全国性考察。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1110-1118. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05409.
8
Making Homes More Dementia-Friendly through the Use of Aids and Adaptations.通过使用辅助器具和适应性改造让家庭对痴呆症患者更友好。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Mar 16;7(1):43. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010043.
9
Evaluation of Medicare Claims Data as a Tool to Identify Dementia.利用医疗保险索赔数据评估痴呆症的工具
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(2):769-778. doi: 10.3233/JAD-181005.
10
Differences in quality of life in home-dwelling persons and nursing home residents with dementia - a cross-sectional study.居家痴呆患者与养老院痴呆患者生活质量差异的横断面研究
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jul 11;16:137. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0312-4.