• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS-29)映射至 EQ-5D-5L。

Mapping the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) to EQ-5D-5L.

机构信息

Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Feb;41(2):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01157-3. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-022-01157-3
PMID:36336773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9883346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) is gaining popularity as healthcare system funders increasingly seek value-based care. However, it is limited in its ability to estimate utilities and thus inform economic evaluations. This study develops the first mapping algorithm for estimating EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) utilities from PROMIS-29 responses using a large dataset and through extensive comparisons between econometric models.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted to collect responses to PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-5L from the general Australian population (N = 3013). Direct and indirect mapping methods were explored, including linear regression, Tobit, generalised linear model, censored regression model, beta regression (Betamix), the adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model (ALDVMM) and generalised ordered logit. The most robust model was selected by assessing the performance based on average ten-fold cross-validation geometric mean absolute error and geometric mean squared error, the predicted mean, maximum and minimum utilities, as well as the fitting across the entire distribution.

RESULTS

The direct approach using ALDVMM was considered the preferred model based on lowest geometric mean absolute error and geometric mean squared error in cross-validation (0.0882, 0.0299) and its superiority in predicting the actual observed mean, full health states and lower utility extremes. The robustness and precision in prediction across the entire distribution of utilities with ALDVMM suggest it is an accurate and valid mapping algorithm. Moreover, the suggested mapping algorithm outperformed previously published algorithms using Australian data, indicating the validity of this model for economic evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a robust algorithm to estimate EQ-5D-5L utilities from PROMIS-29. Consistent with the recent literature, the ALDVMM outperformed all other econometric models considered in this study, suggesting that the mixture models have relatively better performance and are an ideal candidate model for mapping.

摘要

背景和目的

随着医疗保健系统资助者越来越多地寻求基于价值的护理,患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS-29)越来越受欢迎。然而,它在估计效用方面的能力有限,因此无法为经济评估提供信息。本研究使用大型数据集并通过对计量经济学模型进行广泛比较,为从 PROMIS-29 响应中估计欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 级(EQ-5D-5L)效用开发了第一个映射算法。

方法

进行了一项在线调查,以从澳大利亚普通人群(N=3013)中收集对 PROMIS-29 和 EQ-5D-5L 的反应。探索了直接和间接映射方法,包括线性回归、Tobit、广义线性模型、截尾回归模型、贝塔回归(Betamix)、调整有限因变量混合模型(ALDVMM)和广义有序逻辑回归。通过评估基于平均十折交叉验证几何均数绝对误差和几何均数平方误差、预测均值、最大和最小效用以及整个分布拟合的性能来选择最稳健的模型。

结果

基于交叉验证中最低的几何均数绝对误差和几何均数平方误差(0.0882,0.0299),以及在预测实际观察到的均值、完全健康状态和较低效用极端值方面的优势,直接使用 ALDVMM 的方法被认为是首选模型。ALDVMM 在整个效用分布中的稳健性和预测精度表明它是一种准确有效的映射算法。此外,该映射算法在澳大利亚数据方面优于先前发表的算法,表明该模型适用于经济评估。

结论

本研究开发了一种从 PROMIS-29 估计 EQ-5D-5L 效用的稳健算法。与最近的文献一致,ALDVMM 优于本研究中考虑的所有其他计量经济学模型,这表明混合模型的性能相对较好,是映射的理想候选模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88bc/9883346/5f263949b6b1/40273_2022_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88bc/9883346/5f263949b6b1/40273_2022_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88bc/9883346/5f263949b6b1/40273_2022_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) to EQ-5D-5L.将患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS-29)映射至 EQ-5D-5L。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Feb;41(2):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01157-3. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Generating EQ-5D-5L health utility scores from BASDAI and BASFI: a mapping study in patients with axial spondyloarthritis using longitudinal UK registry data.基于 BASDAI 和 BASFI 生成 EQ-5D-5L 健康效用评分:使用英国纵向登记数据的中轴型脊柱关节炎患者的映射研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Nov;23(8):1357-1369. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01429-x. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Indirect and Direct Mapping of the Cancer-Specific EORTC QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D-5L Utility Scores.癌症特异性 EORTC QLQ-C30 量表与 EQ-5D-5L 效用评分的间接和直接映射。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jan;20(1):119-131. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00682-0. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
Mapping ALSFRS-R and ALSUI to EQ-5D in Patients with Motor Neuron Disease.将 ALSFRS-R 和 ALSUI 与运动神经元病患者的 EQ-5D 进行映射。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1322-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Do country-specific preference weights matter in the choice of mapping algorithms? The case of mapping the Diabetes-39 onto eight country-specific EQ-5D-5L value sets.在映射算法的选择中,特定国家的偏好权重是否重要?将糖尿病-39 映射到八个特定国家的 EQ-5D-5L 值集中的情况。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1801-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1840-5. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Mapping the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) to the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in patients undergoing dialysis.将肾脏病生活质量 36 项简明量表(KDQOL-36)映射到透析患者的 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Nov;20(8):1195-1206. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01088-5. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
7
Mapping the Seattle Angina Questionnaire to EQ-5D-5L in patients with coronary heart disease.将西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)映射到冠心病患者的 EQ-5D-5L 量表中。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 3;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02151-9.
8
Direct and Indirect Mapping of Assessment of Quality of Life - 6 Dimensions (AQoL-6D) Onto EQ-5D-5L Utilities Using Data From a Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study of Malaysians With Chronic Heart Failure.直接和间接映射评估生命质量 - 6 维度(AQoL-6D)到 EQ-5D-5L 效用,使用来自马来西亚慢性心力衰竭患者的多中心、横断面研究的数据。
Value Health. 2024 Dec;27(12):1762-1770. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
9
A Direct Comparison of the Measurement Properties of EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-29+2 and PROMIS Global Health Instruments and EQ-5D-5L and PROPr Utilities in a General Population Sample.在一般人群样本中,EQ-5D-5L、PROMIS-29+2 和 PROMIS 全球健康量表与 EQ-5D-5L 和 PROPr 效用工具的测量特性直接比较。
Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):1045-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
10
Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D.测试替代回归模型以预测效用值:将 QLQ-C30 映射到 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D 上。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2823-2839. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1981-6. Epub 2018 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement properties of the PROMIS-29 profile v2.1 in a Norwegian rehabilitation context.PROMIS-29量表v2.1在挪威康复背景下的测量属性
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jul 31;9(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00929-7.
2
Mapping and Linking between the EQ-5D-5L and the PROMIS Domains in the United States.美国EQ-5D-5L与患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)领域之间的映射与关联
Med Decis Making. 2025 Aug;45(6):740-752. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251340990. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
3
Predicting EQ-5D-3L utility values from clinical data in a prospective cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.关于 PROMIS-29 和 EQ-5D 之间关系的证据:文献综述。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jan;31(1):79-89. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02911-4. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Predicting EQ-5D-5L crosswalk from the PROMIS-29 profile for the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.预测英国、法国和德国的 PROMIS-29 概况与 EQ-5D-5L 的换算关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 17;18(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01629-0.
3
Computing PROPr Utility Scores for PROMIS® Profile Instruments.
在前瞻性肾移植受者队列中根据临床数据预测EQ-5D-3L效用值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01802-6.
4
Mapping the ADDQoL to the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,将糖尿病患者生活质量评估量表(ADDQoL)映射到欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)和简明健康效用指数6D第2版(SF-6Dv2)。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 30;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02371-1.
5
Predicting Health Utilities Using Health Administrative Data: Leveraging Survey-linked Health Administrative Data from Ontario, Canada.利用健康管理数据预测健康效用值:利用来自加拿大安大略省的与调查相关的健康管理数据
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00947-y.
6
Realizing the potential of social determinants data in EHR systems: A scoping review of approaches for screening, linkage, extraction, analysis, and interventions.认识电子健康记录系统中社会决定因素数据的潜力:对筛查、关联、提取、分析和干预方法的范围审查
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 10;8(1):e147. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.571. eCollection 2024.
7
The development of a new oral health patient reported outcome measure: the New South Wales public dental services approach.一种新的口腔健康患者报告结局测量工具的开发:新南威尔士州公立牙科服务方法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 19;8(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00777-x.
计算 PROMIS® Profile 工具的 PROPr 效用评分。
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2752. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Mapping the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) to the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in patients undergoing dialysis.将肾脏病生活质量 36 项简明量表(KDQOL-36)映射到透析患者的 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Nov;20(8):1195-1206. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01088-5. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Mapping the FACT-B Instrument to EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Adjusted Limited Dependent Variable Mixture Models versus Response Mapping.使用调整后的受限因变量混合模型与反应映射将 FACT-B 量表映射至乳腺癌患者的 EQ-5D-3L。
Value Health. 2018 Dec;21(12):1399-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-57 and -29 item short forms among kidney transplant recipients.验证患者报告的结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)-57 和 -29 项短表在肾移植受者中的适用性。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):815-827. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2058-2. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Mapping the EORTC-QLQ-C30 to the EQ-5D-3L: An Assessment of Existing and Newly Developed Algorithms.EORTC-QLQ-C30 与 EQ-5D-3L 映射:现有算法和新开发算法的评估。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):954-967. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18797588. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
Evaluating the PROMIS-29 v2.0 for use among older adults with multiple chronic conditions.评估 PROMIS-29 v2.0 在患有多种慢性病的老年人中的应用。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2935-2944. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1958-5. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
The French PROMIS-29. Psychometric validation and population reference values.法国版患者报告结果测量信息系统-29。心理测量学验证及人群参考值。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018 Sep;66(5):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.05.563. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) Scoring System.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)偏好评分系统:基于偏好的总结评分估算。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Aug;38(6):683-698. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18776637. Epub 2018 Jun 26.