• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将自动驾驶车辆视为道德主体会提高相关政策支持。

Trusting autonomous vehicles as moral agents improves related policy support.

作者信息

Hurst Kristin F, Sintov Nicole D

机构信息

School of Earth Systems and Sustainability, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, United States.

School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:976023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976023. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976023
PMID:36337556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9632851/
Abstract

Compared to human-operated vehicles, autonomous vehicles (AVs) offer numerous potential benefits. However, public acceptance of AVs remains low. Using 4 studies, including 1 preregistered experiment (total = 3,937), the present research examines the role of trust in AV adoption decisions. Using the Trust-Confidence-Cooperation model as a conceptual framework, we evaluate whether perceived integrity of technology-a previously underexplored dimension of trust that refers to perceptions of the moral agency of a given technology-influences AV policy support and adoption intent. We find that perceived technology integrity predicts adoption intent for AVs and that messages that increase perceived integrity of AV technology result in greater AV adoption intent and policy support. This knowledge can be used to guide communication efforts aimed at increasing public trust in AVs, and ultimately enhance integration of AVs into transport systems.

摘要

与人工驾驶车辆相比,自动驾驶汽车具有众多潜在优势。然而,公众对自动驾驶汽车的接受度仍然较低。本研究通过4项研究,包括1项预注册实验(共计3937人),探讨了信任在自动驾驶汽车采用决策中的作用。以信任-信心-合作模型为概念框架,我们评估了技术感知完整性(信任的一个此前未被充分探索的维度,指对特定技术道德能动性的认知)是否会影响自动驾驶汽车政策支持度和采用意愿。我们发现,技术感知完整性能够预测自动驾驶汽车的采用意愿,并且增强自动驾驶汽车技术感知完整性的信息会带来更高的自动驾驶汽车采用意愿和政策支持度。这些知识可用于指导旨在增强公众对自动驾驶汽车信任的沟通工作,并最终促进自动驾驶汽车融入交通系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/24c695383196/fpsyg-13-976023-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/5ca96d438e0e/fpsyg-13-976023-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/c5319e84bc2f/fpsyg-13-976023-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/24c695383196/fpsyg-13-976023-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/5ca96d438e0e/fpsyg-13-976023-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/c5319e84bc2f/fpsyg-13-976023-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/878a/9632851/24c695383196/fpsyg-13-976023-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Trusting autonomous vehicles as moral agents improves related policy support.将自动驾驶车辆视为道德主体会提高相关政策支持。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:976023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976023. eCollection 2022.
2
Persona-PhysioSync AV: Personalized Interaction through Personality and Physiology Monitoring in Autonomous Vehicles.人物-生理同步 AV:自动驾驶汽车中的个性和生理监测的个性化交互。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;24(6):1977. doi: 10.3390/s24061977.
3
Determinants and the Moderating Effects of Individual Characteristics on Autonomous Vehicle Adoption in China.中国自动驾驶汽车采用的决定因素及个体特征的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;20(1):43. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010043.
4
Psychological factors affecting potential users' intention to use autonomous vehicles.影响潜在用户使用自动驾驶汽车意愿的心理因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282915. eCollection 2023.
5
Knowledge as a key determinant of public support for autonomous vehicles.知识作为公众对自动驾驶汽车支持度的关键决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):2156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52103-6.
6
Shifting Perceptions and Emotional Responses to Autonomous Vehicles Using Simulated Experiences.通过模拟体验改变对自动驾驶汽车的认知和情感反应。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 30;14(1):29. doi: 10.3390/bs14010029.
7
A study on psychological determinants of users' autonomous vehicles adoption from anthropomorphism and UTAUT perspectives.从拟人化和UTAUT视角对用户采用自动驾驶汽车的心理决定因素的研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 16;13:986800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986800. eCollection 2022.
8
What drives people to use automated vehicles? A meta-analytic review.是什么驱使人们使用自动驾驶汽车?一项元分析综述。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106270. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106270. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
9
Public health principles to inform testing and build trust in automated vehicles.公共卫生原则指导自动驾驶汽车的测试和信任构建。
Inj Prev. 2020 Oct;26(5):494-498. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043136. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
Barriers to the sustainable adoption of autonomous vehicles in developing countries: A multi-criteria decision-making approach.发展中国家自动驾驶汽车可持续采用的障碍:一种多标准决策方法。
Heliyon. 2023 May 9;9(5):e15975. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15975. eCollection 2023 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Does non-motorists' safety perception of autonomous vehicles vary across opinion change stemming from crash occurrence? Investigating perceptions using fixed and random parameter ordered logit models.非机动车驾驶者对自动驾驶汽车的安全认知是否会因撞车事故引发的观点变化而有所不同?使用固定和随机参数有序逻辑模型研究认知情况。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 6;9(9):e19913. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19913. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The ideological divide in public perceptions of self-driving cars.公众对自动驾驶汽车的看法存在意识形态分歧。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 May;29(4):436-451. doi: 10.1177/0963662520917339.
2
Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature.信任与风险感知:文献综述
Risk Anal. 2021 Mar;41(3):480-490. doi: 10.1111/risa.13325. Epub 2019 May 2.
3
Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles.采用自动驾驶车辆的心理障碍。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):694-696. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0202-6.
4
Holding Robots Responsible: The Elements of Machine Morality.《让机器人负责:机器道德的要素》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
5
People are averse to machines making moral decisions.人们反对机器做出道德决策。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
6
Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.公众对全自动驾驶的接受度:社会信任和风险/收益感知的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):326-341. doi: 10.1111/risa.13143. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
7
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.似人非人的:拟人化增强了认知主体的信任恢复力。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2016 Sep;22(3):331-49. doi: 10.1037/xap0000092. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.影响自动化信任发展因素的元分析:对理解未来系统自主性的启示
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):377-400. doi: 10.1177/0018720816634228. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
9
p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.p 值曲线和效应量:仅使用显著结果校正发表偏倚。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;9(6):666-81. doi: 10.1177/1745691614553988.
10
Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.