Mathbout Mohammad F, Hennawi Hussam Al, Khedr Anwar, Vaidya Gaurang N, Stoddard Marcus
Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Cardiology, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Abington, PA, USA.
Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2022 Jun 30;2022(1-2):e202211. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2022.11.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction continues to pose multiple challenges in terms of accurate diagnosis, treatment, and associated morbidity. Accurate left ventricular (LV) mass calculation yields essential prognostic information relating to structural heart disease. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography-based calculations are solely limited to LV geometric assumptions of symmetry, whereas three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography could overcome these limitations. This study aims to compare the performance of 2D and 3D LV mass calculations. A prospective review of echocardiography findings at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, was conducted and assessed. Normal ejection fraction (EF) was defined as >=52% in males and >=54% in females. The following calculations were performed: relative wall thickness (RWT) = 2x posterior wall thickness/LV internal diastolic dimension (LVIDd) and 2D LV mass = 0.8{1.04([LVIDd + IVSd +PWd] - LVIDd)} + 0.6. Concentric hypertrophy was RWT >0.42 and LV mass >95 kg/m in females or >115 kg/m in males. The same cut-offs were used for 2D and 3D echocardiography. Echocardiographic findings for a total number of 154 patients in the study were investigated. There was a weak positive correlation between 2D and 3D LV mass indices ( = 0.534, 2 = 0.286, = 0.001). Seventy patients had 3D EF >=45% with clinical heart failure (HFpEF). Among HFpEF patients, LV hypertrophy (LVH) was present in 74% of patients by 2D echocardiography and 30% by 3D echocardiography (McNemar test = 0.001). Using 3D echocardiography as the reference, 68% of normal patients were misdiagnosed with LV hypertrophy by 2D echocardiography. Two-thirds of the patients with concentric remodeling by 3D echocardiography were misclassified as having concentric hypertrophy by 2D echocardiography ( = 0.001). Adapting necropsy-proven LV mass index cutoffs, 2D over-diagnosed LV hypertrophy through overestimation of the mass, compared to 3D echocardiography. In turn, the majority of HFpEF patients showed no structural hypertrophy of the LV on 3D imaging. This suggests that the majority of patients with HFpEF may qualify for pharmacological prevention to prevent further progression to LV remodeling or LVH.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭在准确诊断、治疗及相关发病率方面仍然面临多重挑战。准确计算左心室(LV)质量可得出与结构性心脏病相关的重要预后信息。基于二维(2D)超声心动图的计算仅局限于LV几何形状的对称假设,而三维(3D)超声心动图可以克服这些限制。本研究旨在比较2D和3D LV质量计算的性能。对肯塔基州路易斯维尔大学的超声心动图检查结果进行了前瞻性回顾和评估。正常射血分数(EF)定义为男性≥52%,女性≥54%。进行了以下计算:相对室壁厚度(RWT)=2×后壁厚度/LV舒张末期内径(LVIDd),2D LV质量=0.8{1.04([LVIDd +室间隔厚度(IVSd)+后壁厚度(PWd)]-LVIDd)}+0.6。向心性肥厚定义为女性RWT>0.42且LV质量>95 kg/m²,男性>115 kg/m²。2D和3D超声心动图采用相同的临界值。对研究中总共154例患者的超声心动图检查结果进行了调查。2D和3D LV质量指数之间存在弱正相关(r = 0.534,r² = 0.286,P = 0.001)。70例患者3D EF≥45%,伴有临床心力衰竭(HFpEF)。在HFpEF患者中,2D超声心动图显示74%的患者存在左心室肥厚(LVH),3D超声心动图显示30%(McNemar检验P = 0.001)。以3D超声心动图为参考,68%的正常患者被2D超声心动图误诊为LVH。3D超声心动图显示为向心性重构的患者中有三分之二被2D超声心动图误诊为向心性肥厚(P = 0.001)。与3D超声心动图相比,2D通过高估质量过度诊断LVH,这与尸检证实的LV质量指数临界值相符。反过来,大多数HFpEF患者在3D成像上未显示LV结构肥厚。这表明大多数HFpEF患者可能有资格接受药物预防,以防止进一步发展为LV重构或LVH。