Suppr超能文献

从比较的角度来看加拿大卫生政策研究人员队伍中的性别构成和工资差距。

Gender composition and wage gaps in the Canadian health policy research workforce in comparative perspective.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada.

Faculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2022 Nov 7;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00774-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gendered challenges have been shown to persist among health practitioners in countries at all levels of development. Less is known about non-clinical professionals, that is, those who do not deliver services directly but are essential to health systems performance, such as health policy researchers. This national observational study examined gender occupational segregation and wage gaps in the Canadian health policy research workforce using a cross-domain comparative labour market analysis approach.

METHODS

Sourcing data from the 2016 population census, we applied linear regression and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition techniques to assess wage differentials by sex, traditional human capital measures (e.g., age, education, place of work), and social identity variables intersecting with gender (household head, childcare, migrant status) among health policy researchers aged 25-54. We compared the gender composition and wage gap with seven non-health policy and programme domains, as mapped under the national occupational classification by similarity in the types of work performed.

RESULTS

The health policy research workforce (N = 19 955) was characterized by gender segregation: 74% women, compared with 58% women among non-health policy research occupations (N = 102 555). Women health policy researchers earned on average 4.8% (95% CI 1.5‒8.0%) less than men after adjusting for other professional and personal variables. This gap was wider than among education policy researchers with similar gender composition (75% women; adjusted wage gap of 2.6%). Wages among health policy researchers were 21.1% (95% CI 19.4‒22.8%) lower than their counterparts in the male-dominated economics policy domain, all else being equal. Overall, women's earnings averaged 3.2% lower than men's due to factors that remained unexplained by policy domain or other measured predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation found that the gender inequalities already widely seen among clinical practitioners are replicated among health policy researchers, potentially hindering the competitiveness of the health sector for attracting and retaining talent. Our findings suggest intersectoral actions are necessary to tackle wage gaps and devaluation of female-dominated health professions. Accountability for gender equity in health must extend to the professionals tasked with conducting equity-informative health policy research.

摘要

背景

在各个发展水平的国家,医疗从业者中都存在性别挑战。对于非临床专业人员(即那些不直接提供服务但对卫生系统绩效至关重要的人员,如卫生政策研究人员),我们了解得较少。本项全国性观察性研究采用跨领域比较劳动力市场分析方法,研究了加拿大卫生政策研究人员劳动力中的性别职业隔离和工资差距。

方法

我们从 2016 年人口普查中获取数据,应用线性回归和 Oaxaca-Blinder 分解技术,根据性别、传统人力资本指标(如年龄、教育程度、工作地点)以及与性别交叉的社会身份变量(家庭户主、儿童保育、移民身份),评估了年龄在 25-54 岁之间的卫生政策研究人员的工资差异。我们将卫生政策研究人员的性别构成和工资差距与全国职业分类中按工作类型相似性划分的七个非卫生政策和方案领域进行了比较。

结果

卫生政策研究人员劳动力(n=19955)的性别隔离程度很高:女性占 74%,而在非卫生政策研究职业(n=102555)中,女性占 58%。在调整了其他专业和个人变量后,女性卫生政策研究人员的平均工资比男性低 4.8%(95%置信区间 1.5-8.0%)。这一差距大于性别构成相似的教育政策研究人员(女性占 75%;调整后的工资差距为 2.6%)。在其他条件相同的情况下,卫生政策研究人员的工资比男性主导的经济学政策领域低 21.1%(95%置信区间 19.4-22.8%)。总的来说,由于无法用政策领域或其他衡量指标来解释的因素,女性的收入平均比男性低 3.2%。

结论

本研究发现,临床医生中广泛存在的性别不平等现象在卫生政策研究人员中也存在,这可能会影响卫生部门吸引和留住人才的竞争力。我们的研究结果表明,需要采取跨部门行动来解决工资差距和贬低女性主导的卫生职业问题。卫生领域的性别平等问责制必须扩展到负责进行公平知情的卫生政策研究的专业人员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2646/9639301/361df5a46cf6/12960_2022_774_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验