• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在荷兰残疾护理组织中实施患者报告的体验测量:共创定制策略的过程评估。

Implementation of a patient-reported experience measure in a Dutch disability care organization: A process evaluation of cocreated tailored strategies.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):132-145. doi: 10.1111/hex.13628. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13628
PMID:36346158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9854305/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 24/7 disability care facilities, patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are important to help healthcare professionals understand what matters to care users and to improve the quality of care. However, the successful implementation of a PREM is complex. In a Dutch disability care organization, stakeholders cocreated tailored implementation strategies aimed at improving the use and integration of a qualitative PREM. This study gives insights into the uptake and experiences with these cocreated implementation strategies and the perceived impact of the set of strategies.

METHODS

We performed a prospective process evaluation between February 2020 and February 2021. We collected data in three disability care facilities from 35 care users, 11 professionals, 3 facility managers and 4 organization representatives. Data collection included observations during kick-offs and learning goal meetings and several attendance checklists. We collected 133 questionnaires (Time 0 and Time 1). We conducted 35 individual semistructured interviews and an online focus group interview. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using directed content analysis.

RESULTS

The exposure to and adoption of strategies was between 76% and 100%. Participants were positive about tailoring the strategies to each facility. Implementation was hindered by challenges in care users' communication and COVID-19. The perceived impact referred to an improved understanding of the goal and added value of the PREM and better preparation and execution of the PREM. The impact of the set of strategies was mainly experienced on the micro level.

CONCLUSION

The uptake of the cocreated implementation strategies was acceptable. The participants valued the tailored approach, which enabled them to focus on facility-specific learning goals. Stakeholder engagement and co-created strategies may have strengthened the adoption of and experiences with the implementation.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

In this article, we present the process evaluation of implementation strategies for the integrated use of a PREM in disability care. A development group consisting of communication vulnerable care users, trainers and professionals developed the implementation strategies. The disability care organization was responsible for the planning and organization of the implementation process. During the process evaluation the end users, trainers, professionals and managers tailored the implementation strategies to their own settings and needs. Researchers observed this implementation process and interviewed the stakeholders about their experiences and the perceived impact.

摘要

引言

在 24/7 残疾护理设施中,患者报告的体验测量(PREMs)对于帮助医疗保健专业人员了解护理使用者关注的问题并提高护理质量非常重要。然而,PREM 的成功实施是复杂的。在荷兰的一家残疾护理组织中,利益相关者共同制定了有针对性的实施策略,旨在提高定性 PREM 的使用和整合。本研究深入了解了这些共同制定的实施策略的采用情况和经验,以及策略集的感知影响。

方法

我们在 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 2 月期间进行了一项前瞻性过程评估。我们从 35 名护理使用者、11 名专业人员、3 名设施经理和 4 名组织代表在三个残疾护理设施中收集数据。数据收集包括在启动会议和学习目标会议期间的观察以及多次出勤检查表。我们共收集了 133 份问卷(时间 0 和时间 1)。我们进行了 35 次单独的半结构式访谈和一次在线焦点小组访谈。定量数据采用描述性统计分析,定性数据采用有针对性的内容分析。

结果

策略的暴露和采用率在 76%至 100%之间。参与者对针对每个设施进行策略定制持积极态度。实施受到护理使用者沟通和 COVID-19 挑战的阻碍。感知到的影响涉及对 PREM 目标和附加值的更好理解,以及 PREM 的更好准备和执行。策略集的影响主要在微观层面上感受到。

结论

共同制定的实施策略的采用是可以接受的。参与者重视定制方法,这使他们能够专注于特定设施的学习目标。利益相关者的参与和共同制定的策略可能增强了实施策略的采用和经验。

患者或公众贡献

在本文中,我们介绍了残疾护理中 PREM 综合使用的实施策略的过程评估。由沟通能力较弱的护理使用者、培训师和专业人员组成的开发小组制定了实施策略。残疾护理组织负责实施过程的规划和组织。在过程评估中,最终用户、培训师、专业人员和管理人员根据自己的环境和需求调整实施策略。研究人员观察了这一实施过程,并采访了利益相关者,了解他们的经验和感知到的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/9b4abcc6ba75/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/59009962a489/HEX-26--g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/36b19d2f633c/HEX-26--g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/0abf02c11bf9/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/9b4abcc6ba75/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/59009962a489/HEX-26--g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/36b19d2f633c/HEX-26--g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/0abf02c11bf9/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1bf/9854305/9b4abcc6ba75/HEX-26--g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a patient-reported experience measure in a Dutch disability care organization: A process evaluation of cocreated tailored strategies.在荷兰残疾护理组织中实施患者报告的体验测量:共创定制策略的过程评估。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):132-145. doi: 10.1111/hex.13628. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
How to foster successful implementation of a patient reported experience measurement in the disability sector: an example of developing strategies in co-creation.如何促进在残疾领域成功实施患者报告体验测量:共同创造中制定策略的一个例子
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 24;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00287-w.
3
PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks.常规围产期护理中的 PROMs 和 PREMs:将其纳入综合产科护理网络的实施情况的混合方法评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w.
4
Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient-reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences.利益相关者参与:从问题分析到残疾护理中患者报告体验测量的实施策略——关于该过程和经验的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Feb;24(1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/hex.13147. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
5
Development of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM): A patient-led consensus work and 'think aloud' study for a quality improvement programme.炎症性肠病(IBD)患者报告体验测量(PREM)的开发:一项以患者为导向的共识工作和“出声思考”研究,用于质量改进计划。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):213-225. doi: 10.1111/hex.13647. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
6
The first steps in the development of a cancer-specific patient-reported experience measure item bank (PREM-item bank): towards dynamic evaluation of experiences.癌症特异性患者报告结局测量条目库(PREM-item bank)开发的第一步:走向体验的动态评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 12;32(2):100. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08266-5.
7
Implementation of a Patient Reported Experience Measure in a Dutch disability care organisation: a qualitative study.在荷兰一家残疾护理机构中实施患者报告体验量表:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 14;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0169-3.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Experiences with the implementation of remote monitoring in patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study with patients and healthcare professionals.远程监测在 COVID-19 患者中的应用经验:一项患者和医疗保健专业人员的定性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):67-78. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12814. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
How to foster successful implementation of a patient reported experience measurement in the disability sector: an example of developing strategies in co-creation.如何促进在残疾领域成功实施患者报告体验测量:共同创造中制定策略的一个例子
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 24;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00287-w.
2
Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient-reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences.利益相关者参与:从问题分析到残疾护理中患者报告体验测量的实施策略——关于该过程和经验的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Feb;24(1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/hex.13147. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
3
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.
采用实施科学方法在常规护理环境中实施和评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)措施。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3015-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: a systematic review of the evidence.患者反馈对改善公立医院以患者为中心的护理质量的作用:系统评价证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05383-3.
5
Implementation of a Patient Reported Experience Measure in a Dutch disability care organisation: a qualitative study.在荷兰一家残疾护理机构中实施患者报告体验量表:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 14;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0169-3.
6
Experienced Quality of Post-Acute and Long-Term Care From the Care Recipient's Perspective-A Conceptual Framework.从护理接受者的视角体验康复期和长期护理的质量:概念框架。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1386-1390.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 May 10.
7
The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews.在提供健康相关服务的组织中实施患者报告结局指标的促进因素和障碍:一项综述的系统评价
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Oct 3;2:46. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0072-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
A methodology for generating a tailored implementation blueprint: an exemplar from a youth residential setting.一种生成定制化实施蓝图的方法:来自青年住宿环境的范例。
Implement Sci. 2018 May 16;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0761-6.
9
Who said dialogue conversations are easy? The communication between communication vulnerable people and health-care professionals: A qualitative study.谁说对话很容易?沟通脆弱人群与医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):848-857. doi: 10.1111/hex.12679. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Patient, carer and public involvement in major system change in acute stroke services: The construction of value.患者、护理人员和公众在急性脑卒中服务重大系统变革中的参与:价值的构建。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):685-692. doi: 10.1111/hex.12668. Epub 2018 Jan 18.