Suppr超能文献

一种用于比较腹主动脉瘤生物力学指标的客观且可重复的囊分离技术。

An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

作者信息

Chung Timothy K, Gueldner Pete H, Kickliter Trevor M, Liang Nathan L, Vorp David A

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 22;9(11):601. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110601.

Abstract

(1) Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) biomechanics-based metrics often reported may be over/under-estimated by including non-aneurysmal regions in the analyses, which is typical, rather than isolating the dilated sac region. We demonstrate the utility of a novel sac-isolation algorithm by comparing peak/mean wall stress (PWS, MWS), with/without sac isolation, for AAA that were categorized as stable or unstable in 245 patient CT image sets. (2) 245 patient computed tomography images were collected, segmented, meshed, and had subsequent finite element analysis performed in preparation of our novel sac isolation technique. Sac isolation was initiated by rotating 3D surfaces incrementally, extracting 2D projections, curve fitting a Fourier series, and taking the local extrema as superior/inferior boundaries for the aneurysmal sac. The PWS/MWS were compared pairwise using the entire aneurysm and the isolated sac alone. (3) MWS, not PWS, was significantly different between the sac alone and the entire aneurysm. We found no statistically significant difference in wall stress measures between stable ( = 222) and unstable ( = 23) groups using the entire aneurysm. However, using sac-isolation, PWS (24.6 ± 7.06 vs. 20.5 ± 8.04 N/cm; = 0.003) and MWS (12.0 ± 3.63 vs. 10.5 ± 4.11 N/cm; = 0.022) were both significantly higher in unstable vs. stable groups. (4) Our results suggest that evaluating only the AAA sac can influence wall stress metrics and may reveal differences in stable and unstable groups of aneurysms that may not otherwise be detected when the entire aneurysm is used.

摘要

(1) 通常报道的基于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)生物力学的指标,在分析中纳入非动脉瘤区域时可能会被高估或低估,这很常见,而不是分离出扩张的瘤腔区域。我们通过比较245例患者CT图像集中被分类为稳定或不稳定的AAA在有/无瘤腔分离情况下的峰值/平均壁面应力(PWS、MWS),展示了一种新型瘤腔分离算法的效用。(2) 收集了245例患者的计算机断层扫描图像,进行分割、网格化,并随后进行有限元分析,以准备我们的新型瘤腔分离技术。瘤腔分离通过逐步旋转3D表面、提取2D投影、对傅里叶级数进行曲线拟合,并将局部极值作为动脉瘤瘤腔的上/下边界来启动。使用整个动脉瘤和单独分离出的瘤腔对PWS/MWS进行成对比较。(3) 单独的瘤腔和整个动脉瘤之间,MWS有显著差异,而PWS没有。我们发现使用整个动脉瘤时,稳定组(n = 222)和不稳定组(n = 23)之间的壁面应力测量值没有统计学显著差异。然而,使用瘤腔分离时,不稳定组与稳定组相比,PWS(24.6 ± 7.06 vs. 20.5 ± 8.04 N/cm;p = 0.003)和MWS(12.0 ± 3.63 vs. 10.5 ± 4.11 N/cm;p = 0.022)均显著更高。(4) 我们的结果表明,仅评估AAA瘤腔会影响壁面应力指标,并且可能揭示出稳定和不稳定动脉瘤组之间的差异,而在使用整个动脉瘤时可能无法检测到这些差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf9/9687639/25183ac4396d/bioengineering-09-00601-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验