• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康文献中的管理视角:系统评价。

The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Healthcare Management, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.

University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Nov 10;10(11):e37624. doi: 10.2196/37624.

DOI:10.2196/37624
PMID:36355426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9693713/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact of digital health on management.

OBJECTIVE

This paper assesses the current state of knowledge in the field of digital health from a management perspective. It highlights research gaps within this field to determine future research opportunities.

METHODS

A systematic review of digital health literature was conducted using 3 databases. The chosen articles (N=38) were classified according to a taxonomy developed for the purpose, and research gaps were identified based on the topic areas discussed.

RESULTS

The literature review revealed a slight prevalence of practical (n=21, 55%) over theoretical (n=17, 45%) approaches. Most of the papers (n=23, 61%) deal with information technology (IT) and are, therefore, focused more on technology and less on management. The research question in most of the papers (n=31, 82%) deals with the creation of concepts, and very few (n=4, 11%) evaluate or even question existing solutions. Most consider the main reason for digitalization to be the optimization of operational processes (n=26, 68%), and 42% (n=16) deal with new business models. The topic area discussed most frequently was found to be eHealth (n=30, 79%). By contrast, the field of tech health with topics such as sensors receives the least attention (n=3, 8%), despite its significant potential for health care processes and strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Three main research propositions were identified. First, research into digital health innovation should not focus solely on the technology aspects but also on its implications for strategic and operational management. Second, the research community should target other domains besides eHealth. Third, we observed a lack of quantitative research on the real impact of digital health on organizations and their management. More quantitative evidence is required regarding the expected outcome and impact of the implementation of digital health solutions into our health care organizations.

摘要

背景

新的数字健康技术被认为是解决医疗保健领域挑战的一种方法,这些挑战包括慢性病患者数量增加和医疗保健支出增加。由于医疗保健领域的数字化仍处于起步阶段,因此关于数字健康对管理的影响还有许多尚未解决的问题。

目的

本文从管理角度评估数字健康领域的现有知识状况。它突出了该领域内的研究空白,以确定未来的研究机会。

方法

使用 3 个数据库对数字健康文献进行了系统回顾。所选文章(N=38)根据为此目的制定的分类法进行分类,并根据讨论的主题领域确定了研究空白。

结果

文献综述显示,实用(n=21,55%)方法略高于理论(n=17,45%)方法。大多数论文(n=23,61%)涉及信息技术(IT),因此更关注技术,而较少关注管理。大多数论文(n=31,82%)的研究问题涉及概念的创建,而很少有(n=4,11%)评估甚至质疑现有解决方案。大多数人认为数字化的主要原因是优化运营流程(n=26,68%),42%(n=16)涉及新的商业模式。讨论最多的主题领域是电子健康(n=30,79%)。相比之下,主题如传感器的技术健康领域受到的关注最少(n=3,8%),尽管它对医疗保健流程和战略具有重要意义。

结论

确定了三个主要的研究命题。首先,数字健康创新的研究不应仅关注技术方面,还应关注其对战略和运营管理的影响。其次,研究界应该关注电子健康以外的其他领域。第三,我们观察到缺乏关于数字健康对组织及其管理的实际影响的定量研究。需要更多关于数字健康解决方案在我们的医疗保健组织中的实施的预期结果和影响的定量证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea3/9693713/d968496078dc/mhealth_v10i11e37624_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea3/9693713/ebdde125df0c/mhealth_v10i11e37624_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea3/9693713/d968496078dc/mhealth_v10i11e37624_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea3/9693713/ebdde125df0c/mhealth_v10i11e37624_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea3/9693713/d968496078dc/mhealth_v10i11e37624_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review.数字健康文献中的管理视角:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Nov 10;10(11):e37624. doi: 10.2196/37624.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing Primary Health Network Employee's Capability in Health and Social Care Commissioning.提升初级卫生保健网络员工在卫生与社会保健委托方面的能力。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Jun 3;17:241-258. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S511151. eCollection 2025.
2
Can the digital economy foster advancements in the healthcare sector? - a case study using interprovincial data from China.数字经济能否促进医疗保健领域的进步?——一项基于中国省级数据的案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21372-9.
3
Organizational Factors Driving the Realization of Digital Health Transformation Benefits from Health Service Managers: A Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of a Cellular-Enabled Glucose Meter on Glucose Control for Patients With Diabetes: Prospective Pre-Post Study.一款具备细胞功能的血糖仪对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:前瞻性前后对照研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Oct 7;4(4):e14799. doi: 10.2196/14799.
2
mHealth Supportive Care Intervention for Parents of Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Quasi-Experimental Pre- and Postdesign Study.针对急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿家长的移动健康支持性护理干预:准实验前后设计研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 19;6(11):e195. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9981.
3
Digital health now and in the future: Findings from a participatory design stakeholder workshop.
卫生服务管理者推动实现数字健康转型效益的组织因素:一项定性研究
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Nov 4;16:455-472. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S487589. eCollection 2024.
4
Developing Health Management Competency for Digital Health Transformation: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.培养数字健康转型的健康管理能力:一项定性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 3;12:e51884. doi: 10.2196/51884.
数字健康的现状与未来:参与式设计利益相关者研讨会的结果
Digit Health. 2017 Nov 9;3:2055207617740018. doi: 10.1177/2055207617740018. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
4
Digital health citizens and the future of the NHS.数字健康公民与英国国家医疗服务体系的未来。
Digit Health. 2016 Oct 10;2:2055207616672033. doi: 10.1177/2055207616672033. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
5
Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data in Health Care: A Systematic Review.医疗保健领域大数据的挑战与机遇:一项系统综述。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Nov 21;4(4):e38. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5359.