Furumoto Kayo, Fujitani Noboru, Nohara Masakatsu, Hata Akihisa
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ikoino-oka 1-3, Imabari 7948555, Japan.
Biomedical Science Examination and Research Center, Okayama University of Science, Ikoino-oka 1-3, Imabari 7948555, Japan.
Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 27;9(11):595. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9110595.
Since April 2020, the method for lactate dehydrogenase (LD) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity measurements in Japan has been switched from the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry (JSCC) reference method, which is only used in Japan, to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference method. However, in some species, the relationship between the blood values of both enzymes measured by the two methods remains unclear. Hence, values measured by these two methods cannot be used interchangeably. Therefore, this relationship was examined in ICR mice and Wistar/ST rats. The LD and ALP values obtained by both methods were plotted on scatter graphs, and regression equations were obtained. To compare the JSCC (x) and IFCC (y) methods, regression equations were generated for LD values in non-hemolytic samples as follows: y = 0.954x - 4.008 for ICR mice and y = 0.963x - 6.324 for Wistar/ST rats. The conversion factors from the JSCC to the IFCC methods were 0.954 (mice) and 0.963 (rats). The conversion coefficients from the IFCC to the JSCC methods were 1.048 (mice) and 1.088 (rats). For ALP values in fasted mouse and rat samples, the regression equations were y = 0.336x - 2.247 and y = 0.314x - 17.626, respectively. The conversion factors from the JSCC to the IFCC methods were 0.336 (mice) and 0.314 (rats). The conversion coefficients from the IFCC to the JSCC methods were 2.978 (mice) and 3.188 (rats). These conversion factors can be used for the mutual conversion of both measured values during the transition period from the JSCC to the IFCC method. However, it should be noted that the conversion coefficients for both LD and ALP were affected by isozyme composition.
自2020年4月起,日本乳酸脱氢酶(LD)和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性的测量方法已从仅在日本使用的日本临床化学学会(JSCC)参考方法,转换为国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)参考方法。然而,在某些物种中,两种方法所测这两种酶的血液值之间的关系仍不明确。因此,这两种方法所测的值不能互换使用。所以,在ICR小鼠和Wistar/ST大鼠中对这种关系进行了研究。将两种方法获得的LD和ALP值绘制在散点图上,并得到回归方程。为比较JSCC(x)和IFCC(y)方法,针对非溶血样本中的LD值生成了如下回归方程:ICR小鼠为y = 0.954x - 4.008,Wistar/ST大鼠为y = 0.963x - 6.324。从JSCC方法到IFCC方法的转换因子分别为0.954(小鼠)和0.963(大鼠)。从IFCC方法到JSCC方法的转换系数分别为1.048(小鼠)和1.088(大鼠)。对于禁食小鼠和大鼠样本中的ALP值,回归方程分别为y = 0.336x - 2.247和y = 0.314x - 17.626。从JSCC方法到IFCC方法的转换因子分别为0.336(小鼠)和0.314(大鼠)。从IFCC方法到JSCC方法的转换系数分别为2.978(小鼠)和3.188(大鼠)。这些转换因子可用于从JSCC方法到IFCC方法的过渡期内两种测量值的相互转换。然而,应当注意的是,LD和ALP的转换系数均受同工酶组成的影响。