Suppr超能文献

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型——自然免疫的作用:一篇叙述性综述

SARS-CoV-2-The Role of Natural Immunity: A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Diani Sara, Leonardi Erika, Cavezzi Attilio, Ferrari Simona, Iacono Oriana, Limoli Alice, Bouslenko Zoe, Natalini Daniele, Conti Stefania, Mantovani Mauro, Tramonte Silvano, Donzelli Alberto, Serravalle Eugenio

机构信息

School of Musictherapy, Université Européenne Jean Monnet, 35129 Padova, Italy.

Guzzardi Hospital, 97019 Vittoria, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):6272. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216272.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity to COVID-19 may be useful to reduce the mortality/morbidity of this disease, but still a lot of controversy exists.

AIMS

This narrative review analyzes the literature regarding these two immunitary processes and more specifically: (a) the duration of natural immunity; (b) cellular immunity; (c) cross-reactivity; (d) the duration of post-vaccination immune protection; (e) the probability of reinfection and its clinical manifestations in the recovered patients; (f) the comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated as to the possible reinfections; (g) the role of hybrid immunity; (h) the effectiveness of natural and vaccine-induced immunity against Omicron variant; (i) the comparative incidence of adverse effects after vaccination in recovered individuals vs. COVID-19-naïve subjects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

through multiple search engines we investigated COVID-19 literature related to the aims of the review, published since April 2020 through July 2022, including also the previous articles pertinent to the investigated topics.

RESULTS

nearly 900 studies were collected, and 246 pertinent articles were included. It was highlighted that the vast majority of the individuals after suffering from COVID-19 develop a natural immunity both of cell-mediated and humoral type, which is effective over time and provides protection against both reinfection and serious illness. Vaccine-induced immunity was shown to decay faster than natural immunity. In general, the severity of the symptoms of reinfection is significantly lower than in the primary infection, with a lower degree of hospitalizations (0.06%) and an extremely low mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

this extensive narrative review regarding a vast number of articles highlighted the valuable protection induced by the natural immunity after COVID-19, which seems comparable or superior to the one induced by anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Consequently, vaccination of the unvaccinated COVID-19-recovered subjects may not be indicated. Further research is needed in order to: (a) measure the durability of immunity over time; (b) evaluate both the impacts of Omicron BA.5 on vaccinated and healed subjects and the role of hybrid immunity.

摘要

背景

针对新冠病毒的自然免疫和疫苗诱导免疫都可能有助于降低该疾病的死亡率/发病率,但仍存在很多争议。

目的

本叙述性综述分析了关于这两种免疫过程的文献,更具体地包括:(a)自然免疫的持续时间;(b)细胞免疫;(c)交叉反应性;(d)疫苗接种后免疫保护的持续时间;(e)康复患者再次感染的可能性及其临床表现;(f)接种疫苗者与未接种疫苗者在可能再次感染方面的比较;(g)混合免疫的作用;(h)自然免疫和疫苗诱导免疫对奥密克戎变异株的有效性;(i)康复个体与未感染新冠病毒个体接种疫苗后不良反应的比较发生率。

材料与方法

通过多个搜索引擎,我们调查了自2020年4月至2022年7月发表的与综述目的相关的新冠病毒文献,还包括与所研究主题相关的先前文章。

结果

收集了近900项研究,纳入了246篇相关文章。研究强调,绝大多数感染新冠病毒后的个体都会产生细胞介导和体液类型的自然免疫,这种免疫随时间推移是有效的,可提供针对再次感染和严重疾病的保护。疫苗诱导免疫的衰退速度比自然免疫更快。一般来说,再次感染的症状严重程度明显低于初次感染,住院率较低(0.06%),死亡率极低。

结论

这项关于大量文章的广泛叙述性综述强调了新冠病毒感染后自然免疫所提供的宝贵保护,这似乎与抗SARS-CoV-2疫苗诱导的保护相当或更优。因此,可能不建议对已感染新冠病毒并康复的未接种疫苗者进行接种。为了:(a)测量免疫随时间推移的持久性;(b)评估奥密克戎BA.5对接种疫苗者和康复者的影响以及混合免疫的作用,还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd70/9655392/12a856c7b8d6/jcm-11-06272-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验