Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Global Nutrition & Wellbeing Unit, Research, Development & Quality Group, Barilla G. e R. Fratelli, 43122 Parma, Italy.
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 23;14(21):4456. doi: 10.3390/nu14214456.
Enhancing healthy and sustainable food systems is one of the key goals of the current European Commission policy. In this light, the creation of a food environment where people are properly informed about the healthiness and sustainability of food choices is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional profile and the environmental impact of meals consumed in a workplace canteen in Italy in the presence of a nudge (i.e., the Double Pyramid logo) combined with a web-based application promoting the Mediterranean Diet. Energy and nutrient contents and the carbon, water, and ecological footprints of 29,776 meals were compared across three subsequent periods (from June to April) through one-way ANOVA. Although the choice of dishes labelled with the Double Pyramid logo was comparable across periods, the selection of fish- and plant-based dishes increased from +2% (fish, vegetables) up to +17% (whole-grain cereals), with a concurrent reduction of meat-based options (−2%). Although the consumption of healthy items increased (p < 0.001), they were not added as a replacement for alternative options, leading to a higher content in energy (p < 0.001) and nutrients (p < 0.001) and worse environmental footprints, contrarily to what was observed when data were adjusted for energy. The intervention significantly improved food choices; however, as the higher selection of desired dishes was not adequately compensated for, it was not fully effective.
加强健康和可持续的食品体系是当前欧盟委员会政策的主要目标之一。有鉴于此,创造一个人们能够充分了解食物选择的健康和可持续性的食品环境至关重要。本研究旨在评估意大利工作场所食堂在使用双金字塔标志和基于网络的应用程序(推广地中海饮食)的情况下,所供应的膳食的营养状况和环境影响。通过单向方差分析,比较了三个后续时期(6 月至 4 月)内 29776 餐的能量和营养含量以及碳、水和生态足迹。尽管带有双金字塔标志的菜肴选择在各时期相似,但鱼和植物性菜肴的选择从+2%(鱼类、蔬菜)增加到+17%(全谷物),同时减少了肉类选择(-2%)。尽管健康食品的消费有所增加(p<0.001),但它们并未被添加以替代其他选择,导致能量(p<0.001)和营养(p<0.001)含量更高,环境足迹更差,这与根据能量调整数据时观察到的情况相反。该干预措施显著改善了食品选择;然而,由于所需菜肴的较高选择没有得到充分补偿,因此效果并不完全有效。