• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防、诊断和治疗妊娠各期所有类型营养不良的营养指南质量评价。

Quality Appraisal of Nutritional Guidelines to Prevent, Diagnose, and Treat Malnutrition in All Its Forms during Pregnancy.

机构信息

Health Department, Universidad Iberoamericana, Prolongación Paseo de Reforma 880, Lomas de Santa Fe, Mexico City 01219, Mexico.

Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition Network (MaCHiNNe), Observatorio Materno Infantil (OMI), Universidad Iberoamericana, Prolongación Paseo de Reforma 880, Lomas de Santa Fe, Mexico City 01219, Mexico.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Nov 1;14(21):4579. doi: 10.3390/nu14214579.

DOI:10.3390/nu14214579
PMID:36364841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9659219/
Abstract

This work aimed to identify clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that include recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of women’s malnutrition during pregnancy and to evaluate the quality of these guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. We conducted a literature review using PubMed and different websites from January 2009 to February 2021. The quality of the CPGs was independently assessed by reviewers using the AGREE II instrument, which defines guidelines scoring >70% in the overall assessment as “high quality”. The analysis included 43 guidelines. Among the main findings, we identified that only half of the CPGs (51.1%) obtained a final “high quality” evaluation. AGREE II results varied widely across domains and categories. The two domains that obtained the highest scores were scope and purpose with 88.3% (range 39 to 100%) and clarity of presentation with 87.2% (range 25 to 100%). Among the “high quality” CPGs, the best scores were achieved by the three guidelines published by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Due to the importance of maternal nutrition in pregnancy, it is essential to join forces to improve the quality of the guidelines, especially in CPGs that do not meet the reference standards for quality.

摘要

本研究旨在确定包含孕妇营养不良预防、诊断和治疗建议的临床实践指南(CPG),并使用评估指南研究与评估工具(AGREE II)评估这些指南的质量。我们于 2009 年 1 月至 2021 年 2 月,通过 PubMed 和其他不同网站进行了文献检索。两名评审员独立使用 AGREE II 工具评估 CPG 质量,将总体评估得分>70%的指南定义为“高质量”。分析共纳入 43 项指南。主要发现包括,仅有一半的 CPG(51.1%)获得最终“高质量”评价。AGREE II 结果在各领域和类别间差异较大。范围和目的维度得分最高,为 88.3%(范围为 39%至 100%),表述清晰度维度得分为 87.2%(范围为 25%至 100%)。在“高质量”指南中,英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)和世界卫生组织(WHO)发布的 3 项指南得分最高。鉴于妊娠期间孕产妇营养的重要性,必须共同努力提高指南质量,尤其是在不符合质量参考标准的 CPG 中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/5174c9fc5c08/nutrients-14-04579-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/168e9c5a426a/nutrients-14-04579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/ff460b8e2531/nutrients-14-04579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/5174c9fc5c08/nutrients-14-04579-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/168e9c5a426a/nutrients-14-04579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/ff460b8e2531/nutrients-14-04579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b999/9659219/5174c9fc5c08/nutrients-14-04579-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality Appraisal of Nutritional Guidelines to Prevent, Diagnose, and Treat Malnutrition in All Its Forms during Pregnancy.预防、诊断和治疗妊娠各期所有类型营养不良的营养指南质量评价。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 1;14(21):4579. doi: 10.3390/nu14214579.
2
A scoping review and critical evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in the preconception.孕前营养临床实践指南方法学质量的范围综述与批判性评价
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 19;10:1122289. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1122289. eCollection 2023.
3
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus published in China between 2007 and 2017 using the AGREE II instrument.使用AGREE II工具对2007年至2017年间在中国发表的糖尿病临床实践指南进行质量评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e022392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022392.
4
Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review.使用AGREE工具对乳腺癌手术治疗指南的评估:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e014883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014883.
5
Quality assessment of recent evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults using the AGREE II instrument.使用AGREE II工具对近期成人2型糖尿病管理循证临床实践指南进行质量评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):166-172. doi: 10.1111/jep.12785. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
6
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument.围手术期体温过低管理的循证临床实践指南:使用AGREE II工具进行系统评价、严格评估和质量评估
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 May 31;79:103887. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103887. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Menopause guideline appraisal and algorithm development for premature ovarian insufficiency.绝经指南评估和卵巢早衰算法开发。
Maturitas. 2019 Dec;130:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 22.
8
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia: A critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.社区获得性肺炎管理临床实践指南:应用 AGREE II 工具进行的批判性评价。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 May;74(5):e13478. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13478. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
A systematic review of the quality of clinical practice guidelines for lymphedema, as assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.采用《研究与评估指南评价工具 II》评估的淋巴水肿临床实践指南质量的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jul;8(4):685-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument.肝素诱导的血小板减少症:AGREE II 工具对临床实践指南的批判性评估。
Thromb Res. 2018 Jun;166:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the management of Dysphagia after acute stroke.急性卒中后吞咽困难管理临床实践指南的质量评估
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 5;14:1310133. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1310133. eCollection 2023.
2
A scoping review and critical evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in the preconception.孕前营养临床实践指南方法学质量的范围综述与批判性评价
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 19;10:1122289. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1122289. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Weight management across preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum: A systematic review and quality appraisal of international clinical practice guidelines.备孕、妊娠和产后的体重管理:国际临床实践指南的系统评价和质量评估。
Obes Rev. 2021 Oct;22(10):e13310. doi: 10.1111/obr.13310. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
2
Healthy dietary patterns and common pregnancy complications: a prospective and longitudinal study.健康的饮食模式与常见妊娠并发症:一项前瞻性和纵向研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Sep 1;114(3):1229-1237. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab145.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
Prevention of noncommunicable diseases by interventions in the preconception period: A FIGO position paper for action by healthcare practitioners.通过孕前干预预防非传染性疾病:FIGO 医疗从业者行动立场文件。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;151 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):6-15. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13331.
5
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #50: The role of activity restriction in obstetric management: (Replaces Consult Number 33, August 2014).母胎医学会咨询系列第 50 号:活动限制在产科管理中的作用:(取代 2014 年 8 月的咨询 33 号)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):B2-B10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.031. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Dietary patterns and diet quality during pregnancy and low birthweight: The PRINCESA cohort.孕期饮食模式和饮食质量与低出生体重:PRINCESA 队列研究。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Jul;16(3):e12972. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12972. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
7
Guidelines for the management of pregnant women with obesity: A systematic review.肥胖孕妇管理指南:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2020 Mar;21(3):e12972. doi: 10.1111/obr.12972. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Double-duty actions: seizing programme and policy opportunities to address malnutrition in all its forms.双重行动:抓住项目和政策机会,解决所有形式的营养不良问题。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 11;395(10218):142-155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32506-1. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
9
Dietary guideline adherence during preconception and pregnancy: A systematic review.备孕和孕期膳食指南依从性:系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Apr;16(2):e12916. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12916. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for nutrition and weight gain during pregnancy: a systematic review.临床实践指南中孕期营养与体重增加方法学质量的系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2020 Jul 1;78(7):546-562. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz065.