Gardner Anna, Jiang Mingkai, Ellsworth David S, MacKenzie A Robert, Pritchard Jeremy, Bader Martin Karl-Friedrich, Barton Craig V M, Bernacchi Carl, Calfapietra Carlo, Crous Kristine Y, Dusenge Mirindi Eric, Gimeno Teresa E, Hall Marianne, Lamba Shubhangi, Leuzinger Sebastian, Uddling Johan, Warren Jeffrey, Wallin Göran, Medlyn Belinda E
Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK.
New Phytol. 2023 Feb;237(4):1229-1241. doi: 10.1111/nph.18618. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
Optimal stomatal theory predicts that stomata operate to maximise photosynthesis (A ) and minimise transpirational water loss to achieve optimal intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE). We tested whether this theory can predict stomatal responses to elevated atmospheric CO (eCO ), and whether it can capture differences in responsiveness among woody plant functional types (PFTs). We conducted a meta-analysis of tree studies of the effect of eCO on iWUE and its components A and stomatal conductance (g ). We compared three PFTs, using the unified stomatal optimisation (USO) model to account for confounding effects of leaf-air vapour pressure difference (D). We expected smaller g , but greater A , responses to eCO in gymnosperms compared with angiosperm PFTs. We found that iWUE increased in proportion to increasing eCO in all PFTs, and that increases in A had stronger effects than reductions in g . The USO model correctly captured stomatal behaviour with eCO across most datasets. The chief difference among PFTs was a lower stomatal slope parameter (g ) for the gymnosperm, compared with angiosperm, species. Land surface models can use the USO model to describe stomatal behaviour under changing atmospheric CO conditions.
最优气孔理论预测,气孔的作用是使光合作用(A)最大化,并使蒸腾失水最小化,以实现最优的内在水分利用效率(iWUE)。我们测试了该理论是否能够预测气孔对大气CO浓度升高(eCO)的响应,以及它是否能够捕捉木本植物功能类型(PFTs)之间响应性的差异。我们对关于eCO对iWUE及其组成部分A和气孔导度(g)影响的树木研究进行了荟萃分析。我们比较了三种PFTs,使用统一气孔优化(USO)模型来解释叶-气蒸汽压差(D)的混杂效应。我们预期,与被子植物PFTs相比,裸子植物对eCO的g响应较小,但A响应较大。我们发现,在所有PFTs中iWUE都随eCO的增加而成比例增加,并且A的增加比g的降低影响更强。USO模型在大多数数据集中正确地捕捉了eCO条件下的气孔行为。PFTs之间的主要差异在于,与被子植物物种相比,裸子植物的气孔斜率参数(g)较低。陆地表面模型可以使用USO模型来描述变化的大气CO条件下的气孔行为。