• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前现场分诊的安全性指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种风险预测模型的开发和验证,以支持现场救护车临床转运决策。

The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: The development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene.

机构信息

Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Design, Trials and Statistics, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276515. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276515
PMID:36383548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9668173/
Abstract

One of the main problems currently facing the delivery of safe and effective emergency care is excess demand, which causes congestion at different time points in a patient's journey. The modern case-mix of prehospital patients is broad and complex, diverging from the traditional 'time critical accident and emergency' patients. It now includes many low-acuity patients and those with social care and mental health needs. In the ambulance service, transport decisions are the hardest to make and paramedics decide to take more patients to the ED than would have a clinical benefit. As such, this study asked the following research questions: In adult patients attending the ED by ambulance, can prehospital information predict an avoidable attendance? What is the simulated transportability of the model derived from the primary outcome? A linked dataset of 101,522 ambulance service and ED ambulance incidents linked to their respective ED care record from the whole of Yorkshire between 1st July 2019 and 29th February 2020 was used as the sample for this study. A machine learning method known as XGBoost was applied to the data in a novel way called Internal-External Cross Validation (IECV) to build the model. The results showed great discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.81 (95%CI 0.79-0.83) and excellent calibration with an O:E ratio was 0.995 (95% CI 0.97-1.03), with the most important variables being a patient's mobility, their physiological observations and clinical impression with psychiatric problems, allergic reactions, cardiac chest pain, head injury, non-traumatic back pain, and minor cuts and bruising being the most important. This study has successfully developed a decision-support model that can be transformed into a tool that could help paramedics make better transport decisions on scene, known as the SINEPOST model. It is accurate, and spatially validated across multiple geographies including rural, urban, and coastal. It is a fair algorithm that does not discriminate new patients based on their age, gender, ethnicity, or decile of deprivation. It can be embedded into an electronic Patient Care Record system and automatically calculate the probability that a patient will have an avoidable attendance at the ED, if they were transported. This manuscript complies with the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement (Moons KGM, 2015).

摘要

目前,安全有效地提供紧急护理所面临的主要问题之一是需求过剩,这导致患者在就诊过程中的不同时间点出现拥堵。现在,院前患者的病例组合广泛而复杂,与传统的“时间关键型事故和急诊”患者不同。现在,它包括许多低危患者和有社会护理及心理健康需求的患者。在救护服务中,最难做出的是转运决定,护理人员决定将更多的患者送往急诊室,而这些患者并不会从中获得临床益处。因此,本研究提出了以下研究问题:在通过救护车前往急诊室的成年患者中,院前信息能否预测是否可避免就诊?从主要结局推导的模型的模拟可转运性如何?本研究的样本是一个从 2019 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日期间整个约克郡的 101522 例救护车服务和 ED 救护车事件与其各自的 ED 护理记录相关联的数据集。一种名为 XGBoost 的机器学习方法以一种名为内部-外部交叉验证(IECV)的新方法应用于数据,以构建模型。结果显示,该模型具有出色的区分度,C 统计量为 0.81(95%CI 0.79-0.83),极好的校准度,O:E 比值为 0.995(95%CI 0.97-1.03),最重要的变量是患者的移动能力、生理观察和有精神问题、过敏反应、心前区疼痛、头部损伤、非外伤性背痛、轻度割伤和瘀伤的临床印象。本研究成功开发了一种决策支持模型,可以转化为一种工具,帮助护理人员在现场做出更好的转运决策,该模型被称为 SINEPOST 模型。该模型准确,并且在包括农村、城市和沿海地区在内的多个地理区域都经过了空间验证。它是一种公平的算法,不会根据患者的年龄、性别、种族或贫困程度的十分位数来歧视新患者。它可以嵌入到电子患者护理记录系统中,并自动计算患者如果被转运,是否会在 ED 避免就诊的概率。本手稿符合多变量预测个体预后或诊断模型的透明报告(TRIPOD)声明(Moons KGM,2015)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/00d2e6f92920/pone.0276515.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/476e9a6ee256/pone.0276515.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/5f101f4de839/pone.0276515.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/41d0a290b6c5/pone.0276515.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/5f3f12bf48b6/pone.0276515.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/9c820ed10799/pone.0276515.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/00d2e6f92920/pone.0276515.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/476e9a6ee256/pone.0276515.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/5f101f4de839/pone.0276515.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/41d0a290b6c5/pone.0276515.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/5f3f12bf48b6/pone.0276515.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/9c820ed10799/pone.0276515.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40af/9668173/00d2e6f92920/pone.0276515.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: The development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene.院前现场分诊的安全性指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种风险预测模型的开发和验证,以支持现场救护车临床转运决策。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276515. eCollection 2022.
2
The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: the development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene-a protocol.院前现场分诊安全指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种支持现场救护车临床转运决策的风险预测模型的开发与验证——方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Nov 8;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00108-4.
3
A novel approach for managing the growing demand for ambulance services by low-acuity patients.一种应对低 acuity 患者对救护车服务需求不断增长的新方法。 需注意,这里的“acuity”在医学语境中常表示“敏锐度”“ acuity level”可表示“病情严重程度”等,由于原文未明确其具体所指,翻译时保留了英文。如果能结合更多背景信息,翻译会更精准。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Sep;40(4):378-384. doi: 10.1071/AH15134.
4
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.
5
6
Mental health emergencies attended by ambulances in the United Kingdom and the implications for health service delivery: A cross-sectional study.英国救护车处理的心理健康紧急情况及其对卫生服务提供的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Apr;28(2):138-146. doi: 10.1177/13558196221119913. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
7
Patient characteristics, triage utilisation, level of care, and outcomes in an unselected adult patient population seen by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.一项前瞻性观察研究:在接受紧急医疗服务的未选择的成年患者人群中,患者特征、分诊利用、护理水平和结局。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-0302-x.
8
Paramedic identification of acute pulmonary edema in a metropolitan ambulance service.大都市救护服务中护理人员对急性肺水肿的识别。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):339-47. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.773114. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
9
[Direct admission of patients to doctors' offices by prehospital emergency services-an effective method to relieve emergency departments? : Analysis of routine pre- and in-hospital emergency data].[院前急救服务将患者直接送至医生办公室——缓解急诊科压力的有效方法?:院前和院内常规急救数据分析]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Sep;117(6):447-456. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00860-x. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study.未被送往急诊科的拨打急救车服务电话的患者的结局:一项数据链接研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):566-577. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-based risk assessment tools for sexual, reproductive and mental health: a systematic review.基于人工智能的性健康、生殖健康和心理健康风险评估工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02864-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of ambulance offload time on 30-day risks of death and re-presentation for patients with chest pain.救护车卸载时间对胸痛患者30天死亡风险和再次就诊的影响。
Med J Aust. 2022 Sep 5;217(5):253-259. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51613. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
Emergency department interventions that could be conducted in subacute care settings for patients with nonemergent conditions transported by paramedics: a modified Delphi study.经急救人员运送的非紧急状况患者在亚急性护理环境中可进行的急诊干预:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;10(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210148. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
3
The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: the development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene-a protocol.
院前现场分诊安全指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种支持现场救护车临床转运决策的风险预测模型的开发与验证——方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Nov 8;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00108-4.
4
Using the South African Triage Scale for prehospital triage: a qualitative study.使用南非分诊量表进行院前分诊:一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00522-3.
5
Development of a prehospital prediction model for risk stratification of patients with chest pain.开发一种院前预测模型,用于对胸痛患者进行风险分层。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.079. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
6
Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Probabilities and Types of Stroke at Prehospital Stage: the Japan Urgent Stroke Triage Score Using Machine Learning (JUST-ML).基于机器学习的日本急诊卒中分诊评分(JUST-ML):开发用于预测院前阶段脑卒中概率和类型的机器学习模型。
Transl Stroke Res. 2022 Jun;13(3):370-381. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00937-x. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
7
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.具有二元结局的临床预测模型外部验证的最小样本量
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4230-4251. doi: 10.1002/sim.9025. Epub 2021 May 24.
8
Using vignettes to assess the accuracy and rationale of paramedic decisions on conveyance to the emergency department.使用案例 vignettes 评估护理人员关于转运至急诊科决策的准确性和合理性。 (注:这里“vignettes”直译为“小插图”,在医学研究语境中可能是特定的案例描述形式等,具体含义需结合上下文确定准确译法,这里暂保留英文以便理解原文确切所指)
Br Paramed J. 2019 Jun 1;4(1):6-13. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.06.4.1.6.
9
Using machine-learning risk prediction models to triage the acuity of undifferentiated patients entering the emergency care system: a systematic review.使用机器学习风险预测模型对进入急诊护理系统的未分化患者的 acuity 进行分诊:一项系统综述。 (注:这里“acuity”在医学语境中可能有“ acuity of illness 病情严重程度”等含义,具体需结合上下文准确理解,但按照要求不添加解释。)
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Oct 2;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00084-1. eCollection 2020.
10
Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Identification.系统评价临床决策支持系统在院前急性冠状动脉综合征识别中的应用。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2020 Sep;19(3):119-125. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000217.