• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前现场分诊安全指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种支持现场救护车临床转运决策的风险预测模型的开发与验证——方案

The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: the development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene-a protocol.

作者信息

Miles Jamie, Jacques Richard, Turner Janette, Mason Suzanne

机构信息

CURE Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Yorkshire Ambulance Service, Brindley Way, Wakefield, WF2 0XQ, UK.

出版信息

Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Nov 8;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00108-4.

DOI:10.1186/s41512-021-00108-4
PMID:34749832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8573562/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demand for both the ambulance service and the emergency department (ED) is rising every year and when this demand is excessive in both systems, ambulance crews queue at the ED waiting to hand patients over. Some transported ambulance patients are 'low-acuity' and do not require the treatment of the ED. However, paramedics can find it challenging to identify these patients accurately. Decision support tools have been developed using expert opinion to help identify these low acuity patients but have failed to show a benefit beyond regular decision-making. Predictive algorithms may be able to build accurate models, which can be used in the field to support the decision not to take a low-acuity patient to an ED.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All patients in Yorkshire who were transported to the ED by ambulance between July 2019 and February 2020 will be included. Ambulance electronic patient care record (ePCR) clinical data will be used as candidate predictors for the model. These will then be linked to the corresponding ED record, which holds the outcome of a 'non-urgent attendance'. The estimated sample size is 52,958, with 4767 events and an EPP of 7.48. An XGBoost algorithm will be used for model development. Initially, a model will be derived using all the data and the apparent performance will be assessed. Then internal-external validation will use non-random nested cross-validation (CV) with test sets held out for each ED (spatial validation). After all models are created, a random-effects meta-analysis will be undertaken. This will pool performance measures such as goodness of fit, discrimination and calibration. It will also generate a prediction interval and measure heterogeneity between clusters. The performance of the full model will be updated with the pooled results.

DISCUSSION

Creating a risk prediction model in this area will lead to further development of a clinical decision support tool that ensures every ambulance patient can get to the right place of care, first time. If this study is successful, it could help paramedics evaluate the benefit of transporting a patient to the ED before they leave the scene. It could also reduce congestion in the urgent and emergency care system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN: 12121281.

摘要

背景

对救护车服务和急诊科(ED)的需求每年都在上升,当这两个系统的需求都过高时,救护人员会在急诊科排队等待移交患者。一些被转运的救护车患者是“低 acuity”患者,不需要急诊科的治疗。然而,护理人员可能会发现准确识别这些患者具有挑战性。已经利用专家意见开发了决策支持工具,以帮助识别这些低 acuity 患者,但未能显示出比常规决策更有优势。预测算法或许能够建立准确的模型,可在现场用于支持不将低 acuity 患者送往急诊科的决策。

方法与分析

将纳入 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 2 月期间在约克郡由救护车转运至急诊科的所有患者。救护车电子患者护理记录(ePCR)临床数据将用作模型的候选预测指标。然后将这些数据与相应的急诊科记录相链接,该记录包含“非紧急就诊”的结果。估计样本量为 52958,有 4767 个事件,事件发生率为 7.48。将使用 XGBoost 算法进行模型开发。最初,将使用所有数据推导模型并评估其表面性能。然后,内部 - 外部验证将使用非随机嵌套交叉验证(CV),为每个急诊科留出测试集(空间验证)。创建所有模型后,将进行随机效应荟萃分析。这将汇总诸如拟合优度、区分度和校准等性能指标。它还将生成预测区间并测量各集群之间的异质性。完整模型的性能将根据汇总结果进行更新。

讨论

在该领域创建风险预测模型将促使临床决策支持工具进一步发展,确保每位救护车患者首次就能被送到合适的护理地点。如果这项研究成功,它可以帮助护理人员在离开现场前评估将患者送往急诊科的益处。它还可以减少紧急和急诊护理系统的拥堵。

试验注册

本研究已在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN)进行回顾性注册:12121281。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea5/8573858/63437111f20c/41512_2021_108_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea5/8573858/63437111f20c/41512_2021_108_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea5/8573858/63437111f20c/41512_2021_108_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: the development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene-a protocol.院前现场分诊安全指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种支持现场救护车临床转运决策的风险预测模型的开发与验证——方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Nov 8;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00108-4.
2
The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: The development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene.院前现场分诊的安全性指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种风险预测模型的开发和验证,以支持现场救护车临床转运决策。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276515. eCollection 2022.
3
Paramedic Checklists do not Accurately Identify Post-ictal or Hypoglycaemic Patients Suitable for Discharge at the Scene.护理人员检查表不能准确识别适合在现场出院的发作后或低血糖患者。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Jun;31(3):282-93. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000248. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
5
Prehospital prediction of hospital admission for emergent acuity patients transported by paramedics: A population-based cohort study using machine learning.院前预测急救 acuity 患者由护理人员转运至医院收治的可能性:一项基于人群的使用机器学习的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289429. eCollection 2023.
6
Using On-scene EMS Responders' Assessment and Electronic Patient Care Records to Evaluate the Suitability of EMD-triaged, Low-acuity Calls for Secondary Nurse Triage in 911 Centers.利用现场急救人员的评估和电子患者护理记录来评估急救医疗调度员分诊的低 acuity 呼叫在 911 中心进行二级护士分诊的适用性。 (注:原文中“low-acuity”可能存在拼写错误,正确的可能是“low-acuity”,直译为“低 acuity”,这里可结合语境理解为“低紧急程度”等意思,具体准确含义需结合专业背景进一步确定。)
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Feb;31(1):46-57. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005567. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Which patients should be transported to the emergency department? A perpetual prehospital dilemma.哪些患者应该被送往急诊科?这是一个一直存在的院前难题。
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Dec;28(6):647-653. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12662. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
8
Using vignettes to assess the accuracy and rationale of paramedic decisions on conveyance to the emergency department.使用案例 vignettes 评估护理人员关于转运至急诊科决策的准确性和合理性。 (注:这里“vignettes”直译为“小插图”,在医学研究语境中可能是特定的案例描述形式等,具体含义需结合上下文确定准确译法,这里暂保留英文以便理解原文确切所指)
Br Paramed J. 2019 Jun 1;4(1):6-13. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.06.4.1.6.
9
Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis.维持性血液透析患者经救护车转运至急诊科后紧急透析的预测因素
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jan 18;10:20543581221149707. doi: 10.1177/20543581221149707. eCollection 2023.
10
Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study.未被送往急诊科的拨打急救车服务电话的患者的结局:一项数据链接研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):566-577. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulance quality and outcome measures for general non-conveyed populations (AQUA): A scoping review.通用非转运人群的救护车质量和结局测量指标(AQUA):范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0306341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306341. eCollection 2024.
2
The Safety INdEx of Prehospital On Scene Triage (SINEPOST) study: The development and validation of a risk prediction model to support ambulance clinical transport decisions on-scene.院前现场分诊的安全性指数(SINEPOST)研究:一种风险预测模型的开发和验证,以支持现场救护车临床转运决策。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276515. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.具有二元结局的临床预测模型外部验证的最小样本量
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4230-4251. doi: 10.1002/sim.9025. Epub 2021 May 24.
2
Using vignettes to assess the accuracy and rationale of paramedic decisions on conveyance to the emergency department.使用案例 vignettes 评估护理人员关于转运至急诊科决策的准确性和合理性。 (注:这里“vignettes”直译为“小插图”,在医学研究语境中可能是特定的案例描述形式等,具体含义需结合上下文确定准确译法,这里暂保留英文以便理解原文确切所指)
Br Paramed J. 2019 Jun 1;4(1):6-13. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.06.4.1.6.
3
Using machine-learning risk prediction models to triage the acuity of undifferentiated patients entering the emergency care system: a systematic review.
使用机器学习风险预测模型对进入急诊护理系统的未分化患者的 acuity 进行分诊:一项系统综述。 (注:这里“acuity”在医学语境中可能有“ acuity of illness 病情严重程度”等含义,具体需结合上下文准确理解,但按照要求不添加解释。)
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Oct 2;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00084-1. eCollection 2020.
4
Drivers of Increasing Emergency Ambulance Demand.急诊救护车需求增加的驱动因素。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 May-Jun;24(3):385. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1635670. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
6
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients.创伤患者院前分诊预测模型的建立与验证
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):421-429. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4752.
7
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies.预后因素研究的系统评价与Meta分析指南
BMJ. 2019 Jan 30;364:k4597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4597.
8
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.基于机器学习的急诊科分诊中儿童临床结局预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937.
9
Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes.建立多变量预测模型的最小样本量:第二部分 - 二分类和生存数据。
Stat Med. 2019 Mar 30;38(7):1276-1296. doi: 10.1002/sim.7992. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.