University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Perelman University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nutr J. 2022 Nov 17;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12937-022-00821-w.
There is a need for a feasible, user-friendly tool that can be employed to assess the overall quality of the diet in U.S.
Our objectives were to develop the Penn Healthy Diet (PHD) screener, evaluate screener item correlations with Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 components, and develop a simple scoring algorithm.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-18 dietary recall data in adults were used to define food examples in screener food groups based on components of the HEI-2015, Diet Approach to Stop Hypertension, and Alternative Mediterranean diet approaches. Instrument Content Validity Index (I-CVI) was used to evaluate the clarity and relevance of the screener. Patient acceptability was evaluated by completion time and response rates. NHANES 2017-18 food recall data were used to simulate responses to the screener items, which were evaluated for association with HEI-2015 components. A scoring algorithm was developed based on screener items moderately or strongly associated with HEI-2015 components. Reproducibility was tested using NHANES 2015-16 data.
The screener had strong clarity (I-CVI = 0.971) and relevance for nutrition counseling (I-CVI = 0.971). Median (IQR) completion time was 4 (3-5) minutes on paper and 4 (4-8) minutes online, and 73% of patients invited online completed the survey. Based on simulated NHANES participant screener responses, 15 of the 29 screener items were moderately or strongly associated with HEI-2015 components, forming the basis of the scoring algorithm with a range of 0-63 points, where higher score indicates a healthier diet. The median (IQR) screener and HEI-2015 scores were 14.96 (11.99-18.36) and 48.96 (39.51-59.48), respectively. The simulated PHD score was highly correlated with the HEI-2015 score (Spearman rho 0.75) in NHANES 2017-18 and confirmed in NHANES 2015-16 data (Spearman rho 0.75).
The Penn Healthy Diet screener may be a useful tool for assessing diet quality due to its acceptable content validity, ease of administration, and ability to distinguish between servings of key food groups associated with a healthy versus unhealthy diet according to the HEI-2015. Additional research is needed to further establish the instrument's validity, and to refine a scoring algorithm.
需要有一种可行的、用户友好的工具,可以用来评估美国的整体饮食质量。
我们的目标是开发宾夕法尼亚健康饮食(PHD)筛选器,评估筛选器项目与健康饮食指数(HEI-2015)成分的相关性,并开发一个简单的评分算法。
使用 2017-18 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)的饮食回顾数据,根据 HEI-2015、饮食控制高血压方法和替代地中海饮食方法的成分,在筛选器食物组中定义食物示例。仪器内容有效性指数(I-CVI)用于评估筛选器的清晰度和相关性。通过完成时间和响应率评估患者的可接受性。使用 2017-18 年 NHANES 的饮食回顾数据模拟对筛选器项目的反应,评估其与 HEI-2015 成分的相关性。根据与 HEI-2015 成分中度或高度相关的筛选器项目开发评分算法。使用 2015-16 年 NHANES 数据测试重现性。
筛选器具有很强的清晰度(I-CVI=0.971)和营养咨询相关性(I-CVI=0.971)。纸质版的中位数(IQR)完成时间为 4(3-5)分钟,在线版为 4(4-8)分钟,在线邀请的 73%的患者完成了调查。根据模拟的 NHANES 参与者筛选器响应,29 个筛选器项目中有 15 个与 HEI-2015 成分中度或高度相关,形成了评分算法的基础,范围为 0-63 分,得分越高表示饮食越健康。筛选器和 HEI-2015 的中位数(IQR)得分分别为 14.96(11.99-18.36)和 48.96(39.51-59.48)。模拟的 PHD 评分与 HEI-2015 评分高度相关(Spearman rho 0.75),在 2017-18 年 NHANES 中得到证实,并在 2015-16 年 NHANES 数据中得到证实(Spearman rho 0.75)。
由于宾夕法尼亚健康饮食筛选器具有可接受的内容有效性、易于管理以及根据 HEI-2015 区分与健康和不健康饮食相关的关键食物组之间的能力,因此它可能是评估饮食质量的有用工具。需要进一步研究来进一步确定该工具的有效性,并完善评分算法。