• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用认知建模来考察竞赛对比赛和锦标赛中策略和努力的影响。

Using cognitive modeling to examine the effects of competition on strategy and effort in races and tournaments.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):1158-1169. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02213-x. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-022-02213-x
PMID:36385356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10264533/
Abstract

We investigated the effects of two types of competition, races and tournaments (as well as an individual challenge and a do-your-best condition), on two different aspects of performance: effort and strategy. In our experiment, 100 undergraduate participants completed a simple cognitive task under four experimental conditions (in a repeated-measures design) based on different types of competitions and challenges. We used the Linear Ballistic Accumulator to quantify the effects of competition on strategy and effort. The results reveal that competition produced changes in strategy rather than effort, and that trait competitiveness had minimal impact on how people responded to competition. This suggests individuals are more likely to adjust their strategy in competitions, and the uncertainty created by different competition types influences the direction of these strategy adjustments.

摘要

我们研究了两种竞争类型,即比赛和锦标赛(以及个人挑战和尽力而为条件)对表现的两个不同方面的影响:努力和策略。在我们的实验中,100 名本科生在基于不同类型的比赛和挑战的四种实验条件(重复测量设计)下完成了一项简单的认知任务。我们使用线性弹道累积器来量化竞争对策略和努力的影响。结果表明,竞争改变了策略而不是努力,并且特质竞争对人们对竞争的反应影响很小。这表明个人更有可能在竞争中调整他们的策略,而不同竞争类型所产生的不确定性会影响这些策略调整的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/9062dea231ce/13423_2022_2213_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/69fbd81b19ae/13423_2022_2213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/ee294ad1cfb2/13423_2022_2213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/a8bef171b73e/13423_2022_2213_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/8ee284da17ae/13423_2022_2213_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/d5809247f12f/13423_2022_2213_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/18bac151c925/13423_2022_2213_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/9180a9b93988/13423_2022_2213_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/7a9d224bb8e4/13423_2022_2213_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/9062dea231ce/13423_2022_2213_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/69fbd81b19ae/13423_2022_2213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/ee294ad1cfb2/13423_2022_2213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/a8bef171b73e/13423_2022_2213_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/8ee284da17ae/13423_2022_2213_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/d5809247f12f/13423_2022_2213_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/18bac151c925/13423_2022_2213_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/9180a9b93988/13423_2022_2213_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/7a9d224bb8e4/13423_2022_2213_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fae/10264533/9062dea231ce/13423_2022_2213_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using cognitive modeling to examine the effects of competition on strategy and effort in races and tournaments.运用认知建模来考察竞赛对比赛和锦标赛中策略和努力的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):1158-1169. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02213-x. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
2
The dynamics of competition and decision-making.竞争与决策的动态变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2811-2822. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02523-2. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
The effects of individual and team competitions on performance, emotions, and effort.个体竞争和团队竞争对绩效、情绪和努力的影响。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013 Apr;35(2):132-43. doi: 10.1123/jsep.35.2.132.
4
Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Performance, Emotion, and Effort: Goal and Means Interdependence.合作与竞争对绩效、情绪和努力的影响:目标与手段的相互依存关系。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;44(2):86-93. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2020-0357. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
Effects of acute pain and pain-related fear on risky decision-making and effort during cognitive tests.急性疼痛和与疼痛相关的恐惧对认知测试中风险决策和努力的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Dec;41(10):1033-1047. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1646711. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Measuring cognitive effort without difficulty.无需费力即可测量认知努力程度。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Apr;23(2):290-305. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01065-9. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Effects of Mixed-Gender Competition: Choking under Pressure in a Dynamic Tournament.混合性别竞争的影响:动态锦标赛中的压力下窒息。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 18;19(8):4925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084925.
8
Influence of Cognitive Interferences and Self-Talk Functions on Performance During Competition in Elite Female Field Hockey Players.认知干扰和自我对话功能对精英女子曲棍球运动员比赛表现的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Dec;30(12):3339-3346. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001440.
9
Association between cognitive function and performance on effort based decision making in patients with major depressive disorder treated with Vortioxetine.文拉法辛治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者认知功能与基于努力的决策表现之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;94:152113. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Capturing Dynamic Performance in a Cognitive Model: Estimating ACT-R Memory Parameters With the Linear Ballistic Accumulator.在认知模型中捕捉动态性能:用线性弹道累积器估计 ACT-R 记忆参数。
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Oct;14(4):889-903. doi: 10.1111/tops.12614. Epub 2022 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamics of competition and decision-making.竞争与决策的动态变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2811-2822. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02523-2. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Computing Bayes factors for evidence-accumulation models using Warp-III bridge sampling.使用 Warp-III 桥采样计算证据积累模型的贝叶斯因子。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):918-937. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01290-6.
3
Information Processing Under Reward Versus Under Punishment.信息处理在奖励与惩罚下的差异。
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):757-764. doi: 10.1177/0956797619835462. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
A simple and flexible Bayesian method for inferring step changes in cognition.一种简单灵活的贝叶斯方法,用于推断认知中的阶跃变化。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):948-960. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1087-7.
5
Understanding the causes of adapting, and failing to adapt, to time pressure in a complex multistimulus environment.理解在复杂多刺激环境中适应和无法适应时间压力的原因。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Sep;24(3):380-399. doi: 10.1037/xap0000176. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
A tutorial on bridge sampling.桥抽样教程。
J Math Psychol. 2017 Dec;81:80-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.005.
7
Using Bayesian regression to test hypotheses about relationships between parameters and covariates in cognitive models.使用贝叶斯回归检验认知模型中参数和协变量之间关系的假设。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1248-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0940-4.
8
Time-varying decision boundaries: insights from optimality analysis.时变决策边界:优化分析的见解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):971-996. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1340-6.
9
How winning changes motivation in multiphase competitions.连胜如何改变多阶段竞赛中的动机。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;112(6):813-837. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000082. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Overcoming indecision by changing the decision boundary.通过改变决策边界来克服犹豫不决。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jun;146(6):776-805. doi: 10.1037/xge0000286. Epub 2017 Apr 13.