• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电切翼管神经分支治疗难治性变应性鼻炎 60 例:单中心观察性研究。

Sixty cases of refractory allergic rhinitis treated by vidian trunk or branch neurectomy: A single-center observational study.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 11;101(45):e31704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031704.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000031704
PMID:36397347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10662795/
Abstract

To investigate the effect of vidian trunk neurectomy and selective vidian branch neurectomy on treating moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis. Sixty patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis treated at Zhejiang Hospital of Integrative Medicine participated in this study from June 2018 to June 2020. The patients in the observation group (n = 40) underwent a vidian trunk neurectomy. The patients in the control group (n = 20) underwent a vidian branch neurectomy. The patients in both groups were followed up after 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of surgery. The efficacy was evaluated based on the AR diagnostic and the efficacy assessment criteria. The 4 symptoms of sneezing, runny nose, nasal congestion, and nasal itch were scored as efficacy indices before and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Nasal endoscopy or sinus CT was performed to assess the postoperative inferior turbinate swelling. The postoperative tear secretion was followed up in both groups, and patients with dry eyes were counted in combination with ocular symptoms. The data recorded before and after surgery and between the 2 groups were analyzed statistically. The observation group had signs of 2.73 ± 0.452 before surgery, 1.20 ± 0.405 6 months after surgery, 1.25 ± 0.494 1 year after surgery, and 1.30 ± 0.564 2 years after surgery. The control group had signs of 2.75 ± 0.444 before surgery, 1.45 ± 0.686 6 months after surgery, 1.75 ± 0.716 1 year after surgery, and 1.90 ± 0.852 2 years after surgery. The between-subjects effect test between the groups showed an overall significant difference (P < .05). The overall effective rate 2 years postoperatively was 38/40 (95.0%) in the observation group and 10/20 (50%) in the control group. Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference between the groups. No patient in either group had dry eyes 1.5 years after surgery. Both vidian trunk neurectomy and selective vidian branch neurectomy have good immediate therapeutic effects, and vidian trunk neurectomy has higher long-term efficacy than selective vidian branch neurectomy.

摘要

为了探讨翼管干神经切断术和选择性翼管分支神经切断术治疗中重度持续性变应性鼻炎的效果。2018 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月,浙江中医药大学附属第一医院收治的 60 例中重度持续性变应性鼻炎患者参与本研究。观察组(n=40)行翼管干神经切断术,对照组(n=20)行翼管分支神经切断术。两组患者均在术后 6 个月、1 年和 2 年进行随访。根据 AR 诊断和疗效评估标准评价疗效。在手术前后 6 个月、1 年和 2 年,将打喷嚏、流鼻涕、鼻塞和鼻痒 4 种症状作为疗效指标进行评分。对术后下鼻甲肿胀进行鼻内镜或鼻窦 CT 评估。两组均对术后泪液分泌进行随访,结合眼部症状计算干眼患者人数。对手术前后及两组间的数据进行统计学分析。观察组术前体征为 2.73±0.452,术后 6 个月为 1.20±0.405,术后 1 年为 1.25±0.494,术后 2 年为 1.30±0.564。对照组术前体征为 2.75±0.444,术后 6 个月为 1.45±0.686,术后 1 年为 1.75±0.716,术后 2 年为 1.90±0.852。组间整体效应检验显示,两组总体差异有统计学意义(P<.05)。观察组术后 2 年总有效率为 38/40(95.0%),对照组为 10/20(50%)。Fisher 确切概率法显示两组差异有统计学意义。术后 1.5 年两组均无干眼患者。翼管干神经切断术和选择性翼管分支神经切断术均有较好的即刻疗效,翼管干神经切断术的长期疗效优于选择性翼管分支神经切断术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/7b4d206dec11/medi-101-e31704-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/5ee0df8c1078/medi-101-e31704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/f2aa15802dfc/medi-101-e31704-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/a0f885020e23/medi-101-e31704-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/afdaa139b064/medi-101-e31704-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/7b4d206dec11/medi-101-e31704-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/5ee0df8c1078/medi-101-e31704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/f2aa15802dfc/medi-101-e31704-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/a0f885020e23/medi-101-e31704-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/afdaa139b064/medi-101-e31704-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e625/10662795/7b4d206dec11/medi-101-e31704-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Sixty cases of refractory allergic rhinitis treated by vidian trunk or branch neurectomy: A single-center observational study.电切翼管神经分支治疗难治性变应性鼻炎 60 例:单中心观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 11;101(45):e31704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031704.
2
[Surgical treatment of vidianneurectomy and selective vidianneurectomy in 60 cases of refractory allergic rhinitis].[翼管神经切断术及选择性翼管神经切断术治疗60例难治性变应性鼻炎]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 7;58(7):705-709. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20220719-00447.
3
Endoscopic vidian and vidian-branch neurectomy for refractory allergic rhinitis: A systematic review.内镜下翼管神经及翼管神经分支切除术治疗难治性变应性鼻炎:一项系统评价
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024 Mar;14(3):679-694. doi: 10.1002/alr.23259. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
4
Efficacy of Selective Vidian Neurectomy for Allergic Rhinitis Combined with Chronic Rhinosinusitis.选择性翼管神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎合并慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83(5):327-334. doi: 10.1159/000512083. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Long-term results of bilateral endoscopic vidian neurectomy in the management of moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis.双侧内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗中重度持续性变应性鼻炎的长期疗效
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 May;138(5):492-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.284.
6
[Effect of endoscopic vidian neurectomy in patients with coexisting allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma].[内镜下翼管神经切断术对合并变应性鼻炎和支气管哮喘患者的疗效]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May 7;55(5):452-457. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200429-00349.
7
Clinical Effect of Endoscopic Vidian Neurectomy on Bronchial Asthma Outcomes in Patients with Coexisting Refractory Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma.内镜下翼管神经切断术对合并难治性变应性鼻炎和哮喘患者支气管哮喘转归的临床疗效
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 May;32(3):139-146. doi: 10.1177/1945892418764964. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Clinical Efficacy of Single Vidian Neurectomy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Allergic Rhinitis.翼管神经切断术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉及变应性鼻炎的临床疗效
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022 May;32(5):618-622. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.05.618.
9
Effects of modified posterior nasal nerve neurectomy combined with accessory posterior nasal nerve neurectomy on controlling intractable allergic rhinitis.改良后鼻神经切断术联合辅助后鼻神经切断术治疗难治性变应性鼻炎的效果。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Mar 28;48(3):404-413. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220593.
10
Antegrade transsphenoidal vidian neurectomy: short-term surgical outcome analysis.经蝶窦视神经切断术:短期手术效果分析。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):e217-20. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3704.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of nasal mucosal autonomic nerve response in efficacy evaluation of vidian neurectomy for allergic rhinitis: a prospective study.鼻黏膜自主神经反应在翼管神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎疗效评估中的应用:一项前瞻性研究
Front Neurosci. 2025 Mar 25;19:1424629. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1424629. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Effect of Endoscopic Vidian Neurectomy on Bronchial Asthma Outcomes in Patients with Coexisting Refractory Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma.内镜下翼管神经切断术对合并难治性变应性鼻炎和哮喘患者支气管哮喘转归的临床疗效
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 May;32(3):139-146. doi: 10.1177/1945892418764964. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
[Effects of vidian neurectomy on allergic rhinitis].[翼管神经切断术对变应性鼻炎的影响]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 7;52(7):484-490. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.07.002.
3
[Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis].
[变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗中国指南]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;51(1):6-24. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.01.004.
4
Clinical practice guideline: allergic rhinitis executive summary.临床实践指南:变应性鼻炎执行摘要
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):197-206. doi: 10.1177/0194599814562166.
5
Clinical practice guideline: Allergic rhinitis.临床实践指南:变应性鼻炎。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1 Suppl):S1-43. doi: 10.1177/0194599814561600.
6
Randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the effect of vidian nerve cauterization on lacrimation.评估翼管神经烧灼术对泪液分泌影响的随机、双盲、对照研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 May-Jun;28(3):255-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4029.
7
[Clinical study on resection of the posterior nasal nerve for hyperreactive rhinopathy].[后鼻神经切断术治疗鼻高反应性疾病的临床研究]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;48(12):1032-4.
8
Mechanisms underlying the neuronal-based symptoms of allergy.过敏的神经元症状的潜在机制。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jun;133(6):1521-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.027. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
[Tear film and lacrimal excretion changes after lacrimal gland tumor removal].[泪腺肿瘤切除术后泪膜及泪液分泌的变化]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;49(1):27-31.
10
Long-term results of bilateral endoscopic vidian neurectomy in the management of moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis.双侧内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗中重度持续性变应性鼻炎的长期疗效
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 May;138(5):492-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.284.