Jin Fang, Ashraf Ahsan Ali, Ul Din Sajid Mohy, Farooq Umar, Zheng Kengcheng, Shaukat Ghazala
School of Management, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Business Administration, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 2;13:1042297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042297. eCollection 2022.
A multifaceted, holistic approach to identifying potential predictors is needed to eradicate workplace bullying. The current study investigated the impact of an unfavourable organisational climate that plays a role in breeding workplace bullying (social stressors). The present study also postulated that individual personality differences (Type A and Type B personality) mediate between a caring climate and workplace bullying. Similarly, the interaction between workplace bullying and personality impacts PTSD. We also checked the role of workplace bullying as a mediator between a caring climate and PTSD. This research tested all the proposed hypotheses ( = 298), and the study was conducted in Pakistan. The data is analysed using the two-step partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) procedure. The first part assesses the measurement model, while in the second step, the structural model is evaluated. The results supported all the proposed hypotheses of this study. Type A behaviour moderated the caring climate-person-related bullying relationship, whereas it did not moderate the caring climate-work-related bullying in the suggested direction. Type A behaviour is moderated for both types of bullying and PTSD. Results also show significant indirect effects of a caring climate on PTSD through workplace bullying. This study will contribute theoretically to filling the literature gap on studies of climate-bullying and bullying-stress using contingency factors.
需要一种多方面、整体的方法来识别潜在的预测因素,以根除职场霸凌。当前的研究调查了不利的组织氛围在滋生职场霸凌(社会压力源)中所起的作用。本研究还假设个体人格差异(A型和B型人格)在关怀氛围与职场霸凌之间起中介作用。同样,职场霸凌与人格之间的相互作用会影响创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。我们还检验了职场霸凌在关怀氛围与PTSD之间作为中介的作用。本研究对所有提出的假设进行了检验(n = 298),且研究在巴基斯坦开展。数据使用两步法偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)程序进行分析。第一步评估测量模型,第二步评估结构模型。结果支持了本研究所有提出的假设。A型行为调节了关怀氛围与人际相关霸凌之间的关系,但在建议的方向上它并未调节关怀氛围与工作相关霸凌之间的关系。A型行为对两种类型的霸凌和PTSD均有调节作用。结果还表明关怀氛围通过职场霸凌对PTSD有显著的间接影响。本研究将在理论上有助于填补关于使用权变因素的氛围-霸凌和霸凌-压力研究的文献空白。