• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于新冠疫情,全球森林砍伐是否加速了?

Has global deforestation accelerated due to the COVID-19 pandemic?

作者信息

Céspedes Jonnathan, Sylvester Janelle M, Pérez-Marulanda Lisset, Paz-Garcia Paula, Reymondin Louis, Khodadadi Mehran, Tello Jhon J, Castro-Nunez Augusto

机构信息

The Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Km 17 Recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Colombia.

Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J For Res (Harbin). 2022 Nov 16:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01561-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11676-022-01561-7
PMID:36405883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9666988/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, questions arose as to whether the pandemic would amplify or pacify tropical deforestation. Early reports warned of increased deforestation rates; however, these studies were limited to a few months in 2020 or to selected regions. To better understand how the pandemic influenced tropical deforestation globally, this study used historical deforestation data (2004-2019) from the Terra-i pantropical land cover change monitoring system to project expected deforestation trends for 2020, which were used to determine whether observed deforestation deviated from expected trajectories after the first COVID-19 cases were reported. Time series analyses were conducted at the regional level for the Americas, Africa and Asia and at the country level for Brazil, Colombia, Peru, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Indonesia. Our results suggest that the pandemic did not alter the course of deforestation trends in some countries (e.g., Brazil, Indonesia), while it did in others (e.g., Peru). We posit the importance of monitoring the long-term effects of the pandemic on deforestation trends as countries prioritize economic recovery in the aftermath of the pandemic.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11676-022-01561-7.

摘要

未标注

随着新冠疫情的蔓延,出现了关于疫情会加剧还是缓和热带森林砍伐的问题。早期报告警告森林砍伐率上升;然而,这些研究仅限于2020年的几个月或特定地区。为了更好地了解疫情如何在全球范围内影响热带森林砍伐,本研究使用了Terra-i泛热带土地覆盖变化监测系统的历史森林砍伐数据(2004 - 2019年)来预测2020年的预期森林砍伐趋势,这些趋势用于确定在报告首例新冠病例后观察到的森林砍伐是否偏离预期轨迹。在美洲、非洲和亚洲的区域层面以及巴西、哥伦比亚、秘鲁、刚果民主共和国和印度尼西亚的国家层面进行了时间序列分析。我们的结果表明,疫情在一些国家(如巴西、印度尼西亚)并未改变森林砍伐趋势的进程,而在其他国家(如秘鲁)则有所改变。我们认为,随着各国在疫情后优先考虑经济复苏,监测疫情对森林砍伐趋势的长期影响具有重要意义。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11676 - 022 - 01561 - 7获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/9a74dc14d6df/11676_2022_1561_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/7cd48aa59c94/11676_2022_1561_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/ba127fdf519b/11676_2022_1561_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/26b8038a21a0/11676_2022_1561_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/3c6e8cb1d185/11676_2022_1561_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/ae4bdfc4a43c/11676_2022_1561_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/9a74dc14d6df/11676_2022_1561_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/7cd48aa59c94/11676_2022_1561_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/ba127fdf519b/11676_2022_1561_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/26b8038a21a0/11676_2022_1561_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/3c6e8cb1d185/11676_2022_1561_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/ae4bdfc4a43c/11676_2022_1561_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b30/9666988/9a74dc14d6df/11676_2022_1561_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Has global deforestation accelerated due to the COVID-19 pandemic?由于新冠疫情,全球森林砍伐是否加速了?
J For Res (Harbin). 2022 Nov 16:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01561-7.
2
Tropical forests: present status and future outlook.热带森林:现状与未来展望。
Clim Change. 1991 Sep;19(1-2):3-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00142209.
3
Scale and context dependency of deforestation drivers: Insights from spatial econometrics in the tropics.森林砍伐驱动因素的尺度和情境依赖性:热带地区空间计量经济学的见解。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226830. eCollection 2020.
4
Export-oriented deforestation in Mato Grosso: harbinger or exception for other tropical forests?马托格罗索州面向出口的毁林:其他热带森林的先兆还是例外?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 22;368(1619):20120173. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0173. Print 2013 Jun 5.
5
Emerging threats linking tropical deforestation and the COVID-19 pandemic.将热带森林砍伐与新冠疫情联系起来的新出现威胁。
Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):243-246. doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
National forest cover change in Congo Basin: deforestation, reforestation, degradation and regeneration for the years 1990, 2000 and 2005.刚果盆地国家森林覆盖变化:1990、2000 和 2005 年的森林砍伐、造林、退化和再生。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Apr;19(4):1173-87. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12092. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
7
An analysis of the spatial association between deforestation and agricultural field sizes in the tropics and subtropics.热带和亚热带地区森林砍伐与农田面积空间关联性分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0209918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209918. eCollection 2019.
8
Annual Carbon Emissions from Deforestation in the Amazon Basin between 2000 and 2010.2000年至2010年期间亚马逊盆地森林砍伐产生的年度碳排放。
PLoS One. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0126754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126754. eCollection 2015.
9
Country 'choices' or deforestation paths: a method for global change analysis of human-forest interactions.国家“选择”或森林砍伐路径:一种人类与森林相互作用的全球变化分析方法。
J Environ Manage. 2001 Oct;63(2):133-48. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0466.
10
Forests or fields? A response to the theory that tropical forest conservation poses a threat to the poor.森林还是田野?对热带森林保护对贫困人口构成威胁这一理论的回应。
Land use policy. 1993 Apr;10(2):108-21. doi: 10.1016/0264-8377(93)90002-r.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of food system drivers of deforestation highlights foreign direct investments and urbanization as threats to tropical forests.分析导致森林砍伐的食物系统驱动因素表明,外国直接投资和城市化是热带森林面临的威胁。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):15179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65397-3.
2
Global shocks, cascading disruptions, and (re-)connections: viewing the COVID-19 pandemic as concurrent natural experiments to understand land system dynamics.全球冲击、连锁破坏与(重新)连接:将新冠疫情视为并行的自然实验以理解土地系统动态
Landsc Ecol. 2023;38(5):1147-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10980-023-01604-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus, macroeconomy, and forests: What likely impacts?冠状病毒、宏观经济与森林:可能产生哪些影响?
For Policy Econ. 2021 Oct;131:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102536. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Potential impacts of COVID-19 on tropical forest recovery.新冠疫情对热带森林恢复的潜在影响。
Biotropica. 2020 Sep;52(5):803-807. doi: 10.1111/btp.12851. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
The social-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: implications for potential forest degradation.新冠疫情的社会经济影响:对潜在森林退化的影响
Heliyon. 2020 Oct 26;6(10):e05354. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05354. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Emerging threats linking tropical deforestation and the COVID-19 pandemic.将热带森林砍伐与新冠疫情联系起来的新出现威胁。
Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):243-246. doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Brazil's COVID-19 response.巴西对新冠疫情的应对措施。
Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):e30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31920-6.
6
Opinion: We have been in lockdown, but deforestation has not.观点:我们处于封锁状态,但森林砍伐却并未停止。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 6;117(40):24609-24611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018489117. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
The Unintended Impact of Colombia's Covid-19 Lockdown on Forest Fires.哥伦比亚新冠疫情封锁对森林火灾的意外影响。
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2020;76(4):1081-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00501-5. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Environmental Impacts and Policy Responses to Covid-19: A View from Latin America.新冠疫情对环境的影响及政策应对:拉丁美洲视角
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2020 Jul 13:1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00460-x.
9
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis.保护区和完整森林景观中的森林丧失:一项全球分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0138918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138918. eCollection 2015.