Abraham Martin, Collischon Matthias, Grimm Veronika, Kreuter Frauke, Moser Klaus, Niessen Cornelia, Schnabel Claus, Stephan Gesine, Trappmann Mark, Wolbring Tobias
School of Business, Economics and Society, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Findelgasse 7, 90402 Nürnberg, Germany.
Institute for Employment Research, Nürnberg, Germany.
J Labour Mark Res. 2022;56(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12651-022-00325-4. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
Employment relationships are embedded in a network of social norms that provide an implicit framework for desired behaviour, especially if contractual solutions are weak. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about major changes that have led to situations, such as the scope of short-time work or home-based work in a firm. Against this backdrop, our study addresses three questions: first, are there social norms dealing with these changes; second, are there differences in attitudes between employees and supervisors (misalignment); and third, are there differences between respondents' average attitudes and the attitudes expected to exist in the population (pluralistic ignorance). We find that for the assignment of short-time work and of work at home, there are shared normative attitudes with only small differences between supervisors and nonsupervisors. Moreover, there is evidence for pluralistic ignorance; asked for the perceived opinion of others, respondents over- or underestimated the consensus in the (survey) population. Such pluralistic ignorance can contribute to the upholding of a norm even if individuals do not support the norm, with potentially far-reaching consequences for the quality of the employment relationship and the functioning of the organization. Our results show that, especially in times of change, social norms should be considered for the analysis of labour markets.
雇佣关系嵌入在一个社会规范网络中,该网络为期望的行为提供了一个隐含的框架,特别是在合同解决方案薄弱的情况下。新冠疫情带来了重大变化,导致了一些情况的出现,比如企业短期工作或居家工作的范围。在此背景下,我们的研究提出了三个问题:第一,是否存在应对这些变化的社会规范;第二,员工和主管之间的态度是否存在差异(不一致);第三,受访者的平均态度与预期在总体中存在的态度之间是否存在差异(多元无知)。我们发现,对于短期工作和居家工作的分配,存在共同的规范性态度,主管和非主管之间只有细微差异。此外,有证据表明存在多元无知;当被问及他人的感知意见时,受访者高估或低估了(调查)总体中的共识。即使个人不支持某种规范,这种多元无知也可能有助于该规范的维持,对雇佣关系的质量和组织的运作产生潜在的深远影响。我们的结果表明,特别是在变革时期,分析劳动力市场时应考虑社会规范。