• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肘相关疾病:与詹姆斯·林德联盟合作确定研究重点。

Elbow conditions: research priorities setting in partnership with the James Lind Alliance.

机构信息

Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK

Trauma & Orthopaedics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e062177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062177.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062177
PMID:36414293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9685230/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a UK-based James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership for elbow conditions and be representative of the views of patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

SETTING

This was a national collaborative study organised through the British Elbow and Shoulder Society.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients, carers and HCPs who have managed or experienced elbow conditions, their carers and HCPs in the UK involved in managing of elbow conditions.

METHODS

The rigorous JLA priority setting methodology was followed. Electronic and paper scoping surveys were distributed to identify potential research priority questions (RPQs). Initial responses were reviewed and a literature search was performed to cross-check categorised questions. Those questions already sufficiently answered were excluded and the remaining questions were ranked in a second survey according to priority for future elbow conditions research. Using the JLA methodology, responses from HCP and patients were combined to create a list of the top 18 questions. These were further reviewed in a dedicated multistakeholder workshop where the top 10 RPQs were agreed by consensus.

RESULTS

The process was completed over 24 months. The initial survey resulted in 467 questions from 165 respondents (73% HCPs and 27% patients/carers). These questions were reviewed and combined into 46 summary topics comprising: tendinopathy, distal biceps pathology, arthritis, stiffness, trauma, arthroplasty and cubital tunnel syndrome. The second (interim prioritisation) survey had 250 respondents (72% HCP and 28% patients/carers). The top 18 ranked questions from this survey were taken to the final workshop where a consensus was reached on the top 10 RPQs.

CONCLUSIONS

The top 10 RPQs highlight areas of importance that currently lack sufficient evidence to guide diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of elbow conditions. This collaborative process will guide researchers and funders regarding the topics that should receive most future attention and benefit patients and HCPs.

摘要

目的

开展基于英国詹姆斯林德联盟(JLA)的肘关节疾病优先事项设定伙伴关系研究,并能代表患者、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的观点。

背景

这是一项通过英国肘部和肩部学会组织的全国性合作研究。

参与者

在英国管理或经历过肘部疾病的成年患者、照顾者和 HCP,他们的照顾者和参与肘部疾病管理的 HCP。

方法

遵循严格的 JLA 优先事项设定方法。电子和纸质范围调查被分发以确定潜在的研究优先问题(RPQ)。对初始回复进行审查,并进行文献检索以交叉检查分类问题。已充分回答的问题被排除,其余问题根据未来肘部疾病研究的优先顺序在第二次调查中进行排名。使用 JLA 方法,将 HCP 和患者的回复结合起来,列出前 18 个问题。在专门的多利益相关者研讨会上对这些问题进行了进一步审查,会上通过共识确定了前 10 个 RPQ。

结果

该过程在 24 个月内完成。初步调查从 165 名受访者(73%为 HCP,27%为患者/照顾者)中产生了 467 个问题。这些问题经过审查并合并为 46 个摘要主题,包括:腱鞘炎、肱二头肌远端病变、关节炎、僵硬、创伤、关节置换和肘管综合征。第二次(临时优先排序)调查有 250 名受访者(72%为 HCP,28%为患者/照顾者)。从该调查中得出的前 18 个排名问题被带到最终研讨会,会上就前 10 个 RPQ 达成共识。

结论

前 10 个 RPQ 突出了目前缺乏足够证据来指导肘部疾病诊断、治疗和康复的重要领域。这一协作过程将指导研究人员和资助者关注应获得最多未来关注的主题,并使患者和 HCP 受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/3f345ec3de99/bmjopen-2022-062177f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/5cdb3e1e25ba/bmjopen-2022-062177f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/eb4c0a1755be/bmjopen-2022-062177f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/3f345ec3de99/bmjopen-2022-062177f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/5cdb3e1e25ba/bmjopen-2022-062177f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/eb4c0a1755be/bmjopen-2022-062177f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/9685230/3f345ec3de99/bmjopen-2022-062177f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Elbow conditions: research priorities setting in partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肘相关疾病:与詹姆斯·林德联盟合作确定研究重点。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e062177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062177.
2
Research priorities in foot and ankle conditions: results of a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.足部和踝关节疾病的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的优先事项设定结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 16;13(5):e070641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070641.
3
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
4
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.银屑病关节炎的 10 项首要研究重点:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2716-2723. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac676.
6
Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.重大创伤管理的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450.
7
Research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.50 岁以上人群上肢骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030028.
8
Research priorities in children requiring elective surgery for conditions affecting the lower limbs: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.儿童下肢疾病择期手术的研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 30;9(12):e033233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033233.
9
Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.确定乳腺癌手术研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06756-4. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
10
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.

引用本文的文献

1
Volume-outcome relationships for primary total elbow arthroplasty surgery in England: Analysis of the hospital episode statistics dataset.英格兰初次全肘关节置换手术的手术量-结局关系:医院事件统计数据集分析
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Sep 1:17585732251360756. doi: 10.1177/17585732251360756.
2
Exploring the Information Needs of People With Elbow Osteoarthritis Seeking Healthcare: A Qualitative Interview Study.探索寻求医疗保健的肘部骨关节炎患者的信息需求:一项定性访谈研究。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70135. doi: 10.1002/msc.70135.
3
Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
2
Research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.50 岁以上人群上肢骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030028.
3
Disease Burden of Medial Epicondylitis in the USA Is Increasing: An Analysis of 19,856 Patients From 2007 to 2014.
肘管综合征的手术治疗:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop. 2024 Feb 28;53:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.041. eCollection 2024 Jul.
美国内侧上髁炎的疾病负担正在增加:对2007年至2014年19856例患者的分析。
HSS J. 2018 Oct;14(3):233-237. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9617-5. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Lateral Epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85,318 Patients.美国外侧上髁炎的流行病学与疾病负担:对85318例患者的分析。
HSS J. 2018 Feb;14(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
Evaluation of common elbow pathologies: a focus on physical examination.常见肘部病变的评估:聚焦体格检查
Phys Sportsmed. 2017 May;45(2):184-190. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2017.1292831. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
6
Non-surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.肱骨外上髁炎的非手术治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价
Hand (N Y). 2014 Dec;9(4):419-46. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9642-x.
7
Evaluation of elbow pain in adults.成人肘部疼痛的评估。
Am Fam Physician. 2014 Apr 15;89(8):649-57.