• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体使用引发的与COVID-19相关的健康不平等:系统评价

COVID-19-Related Health Inequalities Induced by the Use of Social Media: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Shan Yi, Ji Meng, Xie Wenxiu, Zhang Xiaomin, Ng Chok Harrison, Li Rongying, Qian Xiaobo, Lam Kam-Yiu, Chow Chi-Yin, Hao Tianyong

机构信息

Nantong University Nantong China.

University of Sydney Sydney Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Nov 15;2(2):e38453. doi: 10.2196/38453. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.

DOI:10.2196/38453
PMID:36420437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9672898/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

COVID-19-related health inequalities were reported in some studies, showing the failure in public health and communication. Studies investigating the contexts and causes of these inequalities pointed to the contribution of communication inequality or poor health literacy and information access to engagement with health care services. However, no study exclusively dealt with health inequalities induced by the use of social media during COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to identify and summarize COVID-19-related health inequalities induced by the use of social media and the associated contributing factors and to characterize the relationship between the use of social media and health disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on this topic in light of the protocol of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 statement. Keyword searches were performed to collect papers relevant to this topic in multiple databases: PubMed (which includes MEDLINE [Ovid] and other subdatabases), ProQuest (which includes APA PsycINFO, Biological Science Collection, and others), ACM Digital Library, and Web of Science, without any year restriction. Of the 670 retrieved publications, 10 were initially selected based on the predefined selection criteria. These 10 articles were then subjected to quality analysis before being analyzed in the final synthesis and discussion.

RESULTS

Of the 10 articles, 1 was further removed for not meeting the quality assessment criteria. Finally, 9 articles were found to be eligible and selected for this review. We derived the characteristics of these studies in terms of publication years, journals, study locations, locations of study participants, study design, sample size, participant characteristics, and potential risk of bias, and the main results of these studies in terms of the types of social media, social media use-induced health inequalities, associated factors, and proposed resolutions. On the basis of the thematic synthesis of these extracted data, we derived 4 analytic themes, namely health information inaccessibility-induced health inequalities and proposed resolutions, misinformation-induced health inequalities and proposed resolutions, disproportionate attention to COVID-19 information and proposed resolutions, and higher odds of social media-induced psychological distress and proposed resolutions.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper was the first systematic review on this topic. Our findings highlighted the great value of studying the COVID-19-related health knowledge gap, the digital technology-induced unequal distribution of health information, and the resulting health inequalities, thereby providing empirical evidence for understanding the relationship between social media use and health inequalities in the context of COVID-19 and suggesting practical solutions to such disparities. Researchers, social media, health practitioners, and policy makers can draw on these findings to promote health equality while minimizing social media use-induced health inequalities.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6c/10117320/bbfa591586c3/infodemiology_v2i2e38453_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6c/10117320/bbfa591586c3/infodemiology_v2i2e38453_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6c/10117320/bbfa591586c3/infodemiology_v2i2e38453_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

一些研究报告了与新冠疫情相关的健康不平等现象,表明公共卫生和沟通方面存在不足。调查这些不平等现象的背景和原因的研究指出,沟通不平等、健康素养低下以及获取信息的困难对参与医疗服务产生了影响。然而,尚无研究专门探讨新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用所导致的健康不平等问题。

目的

本综述旨在识别和总结社交媒体使用所引发的与新冠疫情相关的健康不平等现象及其相关影响因素,并描述新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用与健康差距之间的关系。

方法

根据PRISMA(系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目)2020声明的方案,对该主题进行了系统综述。通过关键词检索在多个数据库中收集与该主题相关的论文:PubMed(包括MEDLINE [Ovid]和其他子数据库)、ProQuest(包括APA PsycINFO、生物科学文集等)、ACM数字图书馆和Web of Science,无年份限制。在检索到的670篇出版物中,根据预定义的选择标准初步筛选出10篇。然后对这10篇文章进行质量分析,再进行最终的综合分析和讨论。

结果

在这10篇文章中,有1篇因未达到质量评估标准而被进一步排除。最终,9篇文章符合要求并被选入本综述。我们从发表年份、期刊、研究地点、研究参与者所在地、研究设计、样本量、参与者特征和潜在偏倚风险等方面分析了这些研究的特点,并从社交媒体类型、社交媒体使用引发的健康不平等现象、相关因素和建议的解决方案等方面分析了这些研究的主要结果。基于对这些提取数据的主题综合分析,我们得出了4个分析主题,即健康信息获取困难导致的健康不平等现象及建议的解决方案、错误信息导致的健康不平等现象及建议的解决方案、对新冠疫情信息的关注不均衡及建议的解决方案,以及社交媒体引发心理困扰的较高几率及建议的解决方案。

结论

本文是关于该主题的首次系统综述。我们的研究结果凸显了研究与新冠疫情相关的健康知识差距、数字技术导致的健康信息分配不均以及由此产生的健康不平等现象的重要价值,从而为理解新冠疫情背景下社交媒体使用与健康不平等之间的关系提供了实证依据,并针对此类差距提出了切实可行的解决方案。研究人员、社交媒体、健康从业者和政策制定者可以借鉴这些研究结果,在尽量减少社交媒体使用导致的健康不平等现象的同时促进健康平等。

相似文献

1
COVID-19-Related Health Inequalities Induced by the Use of Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体使用引发的与COVID-19相关的健康不平等:系统评价
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Nov 15;2(2):e38453. doi: 10.2196/38453. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Consuming Health Information and Vulnerable Populations: Factors of Engagement and Ongoing Usage.消费健康信息与弱势群体:参与因素和持续使用
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):173-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742549. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
5
Applications of Social Media and Digital Technologies in COVID-19 Vaccination: Scoping Review.社交媒体和数字技术在 COVID-19 疫苗接种中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e40057. doi: 10.2196/40057.
6
Social Media Use and Health and Well-being of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth: Systematic Review.社交媒体使用与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年的健康和幸福感:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 21;24(9):e38449. doi: 10.2196/38449.
7
Interventions in Chinese Undergraduate Students' Mental Health: Systematic Review.针对中国本科生心理健康的干预措施:系统评价
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Jun 15;11(1):e38249. doi: 10.2196/38249.
8
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review.社交媒体上与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息:系统评价。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Jun 1;99(6):455-463A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.276782. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating a Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Knowledge, Sources of Information, and COVID-19-Related Precautions Taken by HBCU Students.驾驭大流行:对 HBCU 学生的知识、信息来源以及 COVID-19 相关预防措施的定性研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Feb;10(1):193-204. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01210-5. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
2
"The Part Played by People" in Times of COVID-19: Interpersonal Communication about Media Coverage in a Pandemic Crisis.《新冠疫情期间“人所发挥的作用”:大流行危机中关于媒体报道的人际传播》
Health Commun. 2023 May;38(5):1014-1021. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1989786. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
3
Factors influencing COVID-19 knowledge-gap: a cross-sectional study in China.
影响 COVID-19 知识差距的因素:在中国进行的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):1826. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11856-9.
4
Disparities in health literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic between the hearing and deaf communities.新冠大流行期间听力和聋人社区之间健康素养的差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Dec;119:104089. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104089. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Mainstream News Media's Role in Public Health Communication During Crises: Assessment of Coverage and Correction of COVID-19 Misinformation.主流新闻媒体在危机期间公共卫生传播中的作用:对新冠疫情错误信息的报道及纠正评估
Health Commun. 2023 Jan;38(1):160-168. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1937842. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: an online cross-sectional study to identify the need for equal attention of intervention.埃塞俄比亚新冠疫情期间的心理困扰:一项旨在确定干预措施需同等关注的在线横断面研究。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 25;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12991-021-00344-4.
8
Social Media Use for Health Communication by the CDC in Mainland China: National Survey Study 2009-2020.美国疾病控制与预防中心在中国大陆通过社交媒体进行健康传播:2009 - 2020年全国调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e19470. doi: 10.2196/19470.
9
We Need the Lens of Equity in COVID-19 Communication.我们需要在新冠疫情传播中运用公平视角。
Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1743-1746. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1837445. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的媒体信任与感染缓解行为。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003323.