• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少 ADHD 青少年驾驶员注意力不集中的训练试验。

Trial of Training to Reduce Driver Inattention in Teens with ADHD.

机构信息

From the Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (J.N.E., J.P., L.T., J.O.S.), and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (J.N.E., J.P., L.T.) - both in Cincinnati; the Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis (A.A.G.); the Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (A.W.K., R.P.M.); and the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Cambridge - both in Massachusetts (D.L.F.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 1;387(22):2056-2066. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204783.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2204783
PMID:36449421
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10929260/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teens with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at increased risk for motor vehicle collisions. A computerized skills-training program to reduce long glances away from the roadway, a contributor to collision risk, may ameliorate driving risks among teens with ADHD.

METHODS

We evaluated a computerized skills-training program designed to reduce long glances (lasting ≥2 seconds) away from the roadway in drivers 16 to 19 years of age with ADHD. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either enhanced Focused Concentration and Attention Learning, a program that targets reduction in the number of long glances (intervention) or enhanced conventional driver's education (control). The primary outcomes were the number of long glances away from the roadway and the standard deviation of lane position, a measure of lateral movements away from the center of the lane, during two 15-minute simulated drives at baseline and at 1 month and 6 months after training. Secondary outcomes were the rates of long glances and collisions or near-collisions involving abrupt changes in vehicle momentum (g-force event), as assessed with in-vehicle recordings over the 1-year period after training.

RESULTS

During simulated driving after training, participants in the intervention group had a mean of 16.5 long glances per drive at 1 month and 15.7 long glances per drive at 6 months, as compared with 28.0 and 27.0 long glances, respectively, in the control group (incidence rate ratio at 1 month, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.76; P<0.001; incidence rate ratio at 6 months, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76; P<0.001). The standard deviation of lane position (in feet) was 0.98 SD at 1 month and 0.98 SD at 6 months in the intervention group, as compared with 1.20 SD and 1.20 SD, respectively, in the control group (difference at 1 month, -0.21 SD; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.13; difference at 6 months, -0.22 SD; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.13; P<0.001 for interaction for both comparisons). During real-world driving over the year after training, the rate of long glances per g-force event was 18.3% in the intervention group and 23.9% in the control group (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92); the rate of collision or near-collision per g-force event was 3.4% and 5.6%, respectively (relative risk, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

In teens with ADHD, a specially designed computerized simulated-driving program with feedback to reduce long glances away from the roadway reduced the frequency of long glances and lessened variation in lane position as compared with a control program. During real-world driving in the year after training, the rate of collisions and near-collisions was lower in the intervention group. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02848092.).

摘要

背景

患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的青少年发生机动车碰撞的风险增加。一种旨在减少导致碰撞风险的长凝视(持续时间≥2 秒)的计算机技能培训计划可能会改善 ADHD 青少年的驾驶风险。

方法

我们评估了一项旨在减少 16 至 19 岁驾驶员注视道路时间过长(≥2 秒)的计算机技能培训计划。参与者以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受增强型专注注意力学习(干预组)或增强型常规驾驶员教育(对照组)。主要结局指标为基线、1 个月和 6 个月训练后 15 分钟模拟驾驶时的长凝视次数以及车道位置标准差(衡量偏离车道中心的侧向运动)。次要结局指标为训练后 1 年内,通过车载记录评估的长凝视次数以及涉及车辆动力(g 力事件)突然变化的碰撞或接近碰撞的发生率。

结果

在训练后的模拟驾驶中,干预组参与者在 1 个月时有 16.5 次长凝视,在 6 个月时有 15.7 次长凝视,而对照组分别为 28.0 次和 27.0 次(1 个月时的发生率比,0.64;95%置信区间[CI],0.52 至 0.76;P<0.001;6 个月时的发生率比,0.64;95%CI,0.52 至 0.76;P<0.001)。干预组的车道位置标准差(英尺)在 1 个月时为 0.98 SD,在 6 个月时为 0.98 SD,而对照组分别为 1.20 SD 和 1.20 SD(1 个月时的差异,-0.21 SD;95%CI,-0.29 至 -0.13;6 个月时的差异,-0.22 SD;95%CI,-0.31 至 -0.13;两者比较的交互作用 P<0.001)。在训练后 1 年内的实际驾驶中,干预组的长凝视次数发生率为 18.3%,对照组为 23.9%(相对风险,0.76;95%CI,0.61 至 0.92);g 力事件的碰撞或接近碰撞发生率分别为 3.4%和 5.6%(相对风险,0.60;95%CI,0.41 至 0.89)。

结论

在患有 ADHD 的青少年中,与对照组相比,专门设计的具有反馈功能以减少注视道路时间过长的计算机模拟驾驶程序可减少长凝视的频率并减少车道位置的变化。在训练后 1 年内的实际驾驶中,干预组的碰撞和接近碰撞发生率较低。(由美国国立卫生研究院资助;临床试验.gov 编号,NCT02848092。)

相似文献

1
Trial of Training to Reduce Driver Inattention in Teens with ADHD.减少 ADHD 青少年驾驶员注意力不集中的训练试验。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 1;387(22):2056-2066. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204783.
2
Extended Visual Glances Away from the Roadway are Associated with ADHD- and Texting-Related Driving Performance Deficits in Adolescents.青少年长时间将视线从道路上移开与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及短信相关的驾驶性能缺陷有关。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Aug;43(6):1175-86. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9954-x.
3
Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training.探讨 ADHD 青少年在强化正向集中和注意力学习(FOCAL+)训练期间技能学习轨迹的模式和预测因素。
Hum Factors. 2025 Jan;67(1):49-62. doi: 10.1177/00187208241237863. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
4
Distracted Driving in Teens With and Without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.患有和未患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的青少年的分心驾驶情况。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):e183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5
Impact of distraction on the driving performance of adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.分心对有和无注意力缺陷/多动障碍的青少年驾驶表现的影响。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Oct;167(10):933-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.322.
6
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
Designing feedback to mitigate teen distracted driving: A social norms approach.设计反馈以减轻青少年分心驾驶:一种社会规范方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:185-194. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.青少年驾驶员对驾驶时注意力不集中和使用手机的认知
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2(0):S52-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1062886.
9
The impact of billboards on driver visual behavior: a systematic literature review.广告牌对驾驶员视觉行为的影响:系统文献回顾。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:234-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.936407.
10
Driving characteristics of teens with attention deficit hyperactivity and autism spectrum disorder.青少年注意缺陷多动障碍与自闭症谱系障碍的驾驶特征。
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;67(6):664-73. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.008821.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of behavioural interventions on young, novice drivers' motor vehicle crash risk: A systematic review.行为干预对年轻新手驾驶员机动车碰撞风险的有效性:一项系统综述。
J Transp Health. 2025 Aug;43. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2025.102045. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
The effects of cognitive training on driving performance.认知训练对驾驶性能的影响。
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01245-6. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
3
Reducing Driving Risk Factors in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Insights from EEG and Eye-Tracking Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Medication Use for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Risk of Motor Vehicle Crashes.注意力缺陷/多动障碍用药与机动车碰撞风险之间的关联
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):597-603. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0659.
2
Naturalistic teenage driving study: Findings and lessons learned.青少年自然驾驶研究:研究结果与经验教训
J Safety Res. 2015 Sep;54:41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
3
Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase.年轻驾驶员的事故率与驾照年龄、驾龄和驾照阶段有关。
减少注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)青少年的驾驶风险因素:来自 EEG 和眼动追踪分析的见解。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 23;24(11):3319. doi: 10.3390/s24113319.
4
Improving the efficacy and effectiveness of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents.提高针对儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的循证心理社会干预措施的疗效和效果。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 8;14(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02890-3.
5
Comparing the Driving Skills of Adolescents with Obstructive Sleep Apnea to Healthy Controls: The Results of a Case-Controlled Observational Study.比较阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停青少年与健康对照者的驾驶技能:一项病例对照观察性研究的结果
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;10(10):1624. doi: 10.3390/children10101624.
6
Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Adverse Driving Outcomes in Teen Drivers With ADHD.执行功能对 ADHD 青少年驾驶员不良驾驶后果的预测作用。
J Atten Disord. 2023 Dec;27(14):1650-1661. doi: 10.1177/10870547231197210. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 20.
4
Extended Visual Glances Away from the Roadway are Associated with ADHD- and Texting-Related Driving Performance Deficits in Adolescents.青少年长时间将视线从道路上移开与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及短信相关的驾驶性能缺陷有关。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Aug;43(6):1175-86. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9954-x.
5
Distracted driver behaviors and distracting conditions among adolescent drivers: findings from a naturalistic driving study.青少年驾驶员的分心驾驶行为和分心条件:自然驾驶研究的结果。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5 Suppl):S50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.005.
6
Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers.分心驾驶与新手和经验丰富司机的道路碰撞风险。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):54-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1204142.
7
How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving.开车时不看路有多危险?算法通过自然驾驶中的注视模式预测事故风险。
Hum Factors. 2012 Dec;54(6):1104-16. doi: 10.1177/0018720812446965.
8
Evidence-based review on interventions and determinants of driving performance in teens with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism spectrum disorder.基于证据的综述:青少年注意缺陷多动障碍或自闭症谱系障碍患者驾驶表现的干预措施和决定因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(2):188-93. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.700747.
9
The effects of focused attention training on the duration of novice drivers' glances inside the vehicle.集中注意力训练对新手驾驶员在车内注视时间的影响。
Ergonomics. 2011 Oct;54(10):917-31. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.607245.
10
Are Driving Simulators Effective Tools for Evaluating Novice Drivers' Hazard Anticipation, Speed Management, and Attention Maintenance Skills.驾驶模拟器是评估新手驾驶员危险预判、速度管理和注意力维持技能的有效工具吗?
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):343-353. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2010.04.001.