Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5 Suppl):S50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.005.
The proliferation of new communication technologies and capabilities has prompted concern about driving safety. This concern is particularly acute for inexperienced adolescent drivers. In addition to being early adopters of technology, many adolescents have not achieved the degree of automaticity in driving that characterizes experienced adults. Consequently, distractions may be more problematic in this group. Yet little is known about the nature or prevalence of distracted driving behaviors or distracting conditions among adolescent drivers.
Vehicles of 52 high-school age drivers (N=38 beginners and N=14 more experienced) were equipped for 6 months with unobtrusive event-triggered data recorders that obtain 20-second clips of video, audio, and vehicle kinematic information when triggered. A low recording trigger threshold was set to obtain a sample of essentially random driving segments along with those indicating rough driving behaviors.
Electronic device use (6.7%) was the most common single type of distracted behavior, followed by adjusting vehicle controls (6.2%) and grooming (3.8%). Most distracted driver behaviors were less frequent when passengers were present. However, loud conversation and horseplay were quite common in the presence of multiple peer passengers. These conditions were associated with looking away from the road, the occurrence of serious events, and, to a lesser extent, rough driving (high g-force events).
Common assumptions about adolescent driver distraction are only partially borne out by in-vehicle measurement. The association of passengers with distraction appears more complex than previously realized. The relationship between distractions and serious events differed from the association with rough driving.
新通信技术和功能的普及引发了对驾驶安全的关注。对于缺乏经验的青少年司机来说,这种担忧尤为严重。除了是技术的早期采用者外,许多青少年在驾驶方面还没有达到经验丰富的成年人所具有的自动化程度。因此,在这个群体中,分心可能更为严重。然而,对于青少年司机的分心驾驶行为或分心状态的性质或流行程度,我们知之甚少。
为 52 名高中生驾驶员(N=38 名初学者和 N=14 名经验更丰富的驾驶员)的车辆配备了 6 个月的不显眼的事件触发数据记录器,当触发时,该记录器会获取 20 秒的视频、音频和车辆运动信息片段。设置了较低的记录触发阈值,以便在指示粗糙驾驶行为的情况下,获取基本随机驾驶片段的样本。
电子设备使用(6.7%)是最常见的单一分心行为类型,其次是调整车辆控制(6.2%)和修饰(3.8%)。当有乘客在场时,大多数分心驾驶行为的频率较低。然而,在有多个同龄乘客在场的情况下,大声交谈和嬉戏打闹很常见。这些情况与驾驶员视线离开道路、严重事件的发生以及在较小程度上与粗糙驾驶(高 G 力事件)有关。
关于青少年司机分心的常见假设仅在车内测量中得到部分证实。乘客与分心之间的关联比之前想象的要复杂。分心与严重事件之间的关系与与粗糙驾驶的关系不同。