Suppr超能文献

单纯减压或减压融合治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项具有两年 MRI 随访的随机临床试验。

Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Orthopaedic Clinic, Spine Section, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2022 Dec;104-B(12):1343-1351. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B12.BJJ-2022-0340.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

METHODS

The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study (SSSS) was conducted between 2006 and 2012 at five public and two private hospitals. Six centres participated in this two-year MRI follow-up. We randomized 222 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels into two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The presence or absence of a preoperative spondylolisthesis was noted. A new stenosis on two-year MRI was used as the primary outcome, defined as a dural sac cross-sectional area ≤ 75 mm at the operated level (restenosis) and/or at the level above (proximal adjacent level stenosis).

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients underwent surgery at a mean age of 66 years (69% female): 103 were treated by decompression with fusion and 108 by decompression alone. A two-year MRI was available for 176 (90%) of the eligible patients. A new stenosis at the operated and/or adjacent level occurred more frequently after decompression and fusion than after decompression alone (47% vs 29%; p = 0.020). The difference remained in the subgroup with a preoperative spondylolisthesis, (48% vs 24%; p = 0.020), but did not reach significance for those without (45% vs 35%; p = 0.488). Proximal adjacent level stenosis was more common after fusion than after decompression alone (44% vs 17%; p < 0.001). Restenosis at the operated level was less frequent after fusion than decompression alone (4% vs 14%; p = 0.036). Vertebral slip increased by 1.1 mm after decompression alone, regardless of whether a preoperative spondylolisthesis was present or not.

CONCLUSION

Adding fusion to a decompression increased the rate of new stenosis on two-year MRI, even when a spondylolisthesis was present preoperatively. This supports decompression alone as the preferred method of surgery for spinal stenosis, whether or not a degenerative spondylolisthesis is present preoperatively.Cite this article:  2022;104-B(12):1343-1351.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的首先是确定在腰椎管狭窄症减压的基础上增加融合是否会降低术后两年时影像学再狭窄和/或近端相邻节段狭窄的发生率,其次是评估术后两年时融合与不融合对椎体滑移的影响。

方法

瑞典腰椎管狭窄症研究(SSSS)于 2006 年至 2012 年在五家公立医院和两家私立医院进行。六个中心参与了这项为期两年的 MRI 随访。我们将 222 名患有单节段或双节段中央型腰椎管狭窄症的患者随机分为两组,一组仅行减压手术,另一组行减压加融合手术。记录术前是否存在脊椎滑脱。新的狭窄症出现在两年时的 MRI 上被用作主要结局,定义为手术节段(再狭窄)和/或上方节段(近端相邻节段狭窄)的硬脊膜囊横截面积≤75mm。

结果

共有 211 名患者在平均年龄为 66 岁(69%为女性)时接受了手术:103 名患者接受了减压加融合治疗,108 名患者仅接受了减压治疗。176 名(90%)符合条件的患者进行了两年时的 MRI 检查。与单纯减压组相比,减压融合组在手术和/或相邻节段出现新的狭窄更为常见(47%比 29%;p=0.020)。在术前存在脊椎滑脱的亚组中,差异仍然存在(48%比 24%;p=0.020),但在没有脊椎滑脱的患者中没有达到统计学意义(45%比 35%;p=0.488)。与单纯减压组相比,融合组的近端相邻节段狭窄更为常见(44%比 17%;p<0.001)。融合组术后再狭窄的发生率低于单纯减压组(4%比 14%;p=0.036)。单纯减压后,无论术前是否存在脊椎滑脱,椎体滑移增加 1.1mm。

结论

在腰椎管狭窄症减压的基础上增加融合会增加术后两年时的新狭窄率,即使术前存在脊椎滑脱。这支持单纯减压作为腰椎管狭窄症的首选手术方法,无论术前是否存在退行性脊椎滑脱。

引用本文:2022;104-B(12):1343-1351.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b57/9680197/363116317ee1/BJJ-104B-1343-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验