• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥司他韦(达菲)治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277206. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0277206
PMID:36454880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714710/
Abstract

Efforts are ongoing by researchers globally to develop new drugs or repurpose existing ones for treating COVID-19. Thus, this led to the use of oseltamivir, an antiviral drug used for treating influenza A and B viruses, as a trial drug for COVID-19. However, available evidence from clinical studies has shown conflicting results on the effectiveness of oseltamivir in COVID-19 treatment. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of oseltamivir for treating COVID-19. The study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, and the priori protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021270821). Five databases were searched, the identified records were screened, and followed by the extraction of relevant data. Eight observational studies from four Asian countries were included. A random-effects model was used to pool odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MD), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the study analysis. Survival was not significantly different between all categories of oseltamivir and the comparison groups analysed. The duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the oseltamivir group following sensitivity analysis (MD -5.95, 95% CI -9.91--1.99 p = 0.003, heterogeneity I2 0%, p = 0.37). The virological, laboratory and radiological response rates were all not in favour of oseltamivir. However, the electrocardiographic safety parameters were found to be better in the oseltamivir group. However, more studies are needed to establish robust evidence on the effectiveness or otherwise of oseltamivir usage for treating COVID-19.

摘要

全球研究人员正在努力开发新的药物或重新利用现有的药物来治疗 COVID-19。因此,这导致了抗病毒药物奥司他韦被用作 COVID-19 的试验药物,该药物用于治疗甲型和乙型流感病毒。然而,来自临床研究的现有证据表明,奥司他韦在 COVID-19 治疗中的有效性存在相互矛盾的结果。因此,进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估奥司他韦治疗 COVID-19 的临床安全性和疗效。该研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行,预先方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42021270821)中进行了注册。共检索了 5 个数据库,筛选了确定的记录,并随后提取了相关数据。纳入了来自四个亚洲国家的八项观察性研究。使用随机效应模型对所有类别奥司他韦和分析比较组的优势比(OR)、均值差异(MD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行了汇总。所有奥司他韦类别与分析比较组之间的生存率无显著差异。敏感性分析显示,奥司他韦组的住院时间明显缩短(MD-5.95,95%CI-9.91--1.99,p=0.003,异质性 I2 0%,p=0.37)。病毒学、实验室和影像学反应率均不利于奥司他韦。然而,奥司他韦组的心电图安全性参数更好。然而,需要更多的研究来建立关于奥司他韦治疗 COVID-19 的有效性或其他方面的可靠证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/7ff7de565757/pone.0277206.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/914ba2fbe073/pone.0277206.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/991d235f60ed/pone.0277206.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/077e40b92fb3/pone.0277206.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/cb7b9b4e6d42/pone.0277206.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/f30fe1719104/pone.0277206.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/f2600c24d7c1/pone.0277206.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/d491f942cd0c/pone.0277206.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/65f0f318e353/pone.0277206.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/b21f792150f6/pone.0277206.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/1ff16417bdb7/pone.0277206.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/963f68394891/pone.0277206.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/2266d9a3daf3/pone.0277206.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/a13c0871cdc4/pone.0277206.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/987afd9528af/pone.0277206.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/7ff7de565757/pone.0277206.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/914ba2fbe073/pone.0277206.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/991d235f60ed/pone.0277206.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/077e40b92fb3/pone.0277206.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/cb7b9b4e6d42/pone.0277206.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/f30fe1719104/pone.0277206.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/f2600c24d7c1/pone.0277206.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/d491f942cd0c/pone.0277206.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/65f0f318e353/pone.0277206.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/b21f792150f6/pone.0277206.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/1ff16417bdb7/pone.0277206.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/963f68394891/pone.0277206.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/2266d9a3daf3/pone.0277206.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/a13c0871cdc4/pone.0277206.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/987afd9528af/pone.0277206.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7164/9714710/7ff7de565757/pone.0277206.g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).奥司他韦(达菲)治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277206. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children.用于预防和治疗健康成人及儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD008965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub3.
4
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in adults and children.用于预防和治疗成人及儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 10;2014(4):CD008965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub4.
5
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.用于预防和治疗健康成年人流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2009 Dec 8;339:b5106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5106.
6
Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of regulatory and mortality data.用于流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂:对监管和死亡率数据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 May;20(42):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta20420.
7
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children (published trials only).用于预防和治疗儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂(仅已发表的试验)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD002744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002744.pub4.
8
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children.用于预防和治疗儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD002744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002744.pub3.
9
Antivirals for treatment of severe influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.抗流感病毒药物治疗严重流感:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Aug 24;404(10454):753-763. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01307-2.
10
Assessment of neuropsychiatric adverse events in influenza patients treated with oseltamivir: a comprehensive review.对接受奥司他韦治疗的流感患者神经精神不良事件的评估:一项全面综述。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(12):1097-114. doi: 10.2165/0002018-200831120-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory analysis of hospitalized and fatal COVID-19 cases in the first fully vaccinated municipality in Northeast Brazil.巴西东北部首个实现全面疫苗接种的城市中住院及死亡的新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)病例的临床、流行病学和实验室分析
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2025 Aug 18;67:e50. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202567050. eCollection 2025.
2
Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists, for 2025.2025年波兰流行病学家和传染病学家协会新型冠状病毒2感染管理临床实践指南
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 27;14(7):2305. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072305.
3

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 vaccines.新型冠状病毒疫苗。
Curr Opin Immunol. 2021 Aug;71:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Evaluation of the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines: a rapid review.评估 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性概况:快速综述。
BMC Med. 2021 Jul 28;19(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02059-5.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿奇霉素治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
IPNA clinical practice recommendations on care of pediatric patients with pre-existing kidney disease during seasonal outbreak of COVID-19.
国际儿科肾脏病学会(IPNA)关于新冠病毒病(COVID-19)季节性暴发期间患有基础肾脏病的儿科患者护理的临床实践建议
Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 May;40(5):1795-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06565-5. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
4
Evaluation of the efficacy of triazavirin versus oseltamivir in management of COVID-19.三氮唑核苷与奥司他韦治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的疗效评估。
Future Sci OA. 2024 Dec 31;10(1):2418798. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2024.2418798. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
5
Multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of CAR-T recipients in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era.COVID-19大流行后时代CAR-T细胞疗法接受者管理的多学科建议。
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2023 Jul 27;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40164-023-00426-x.
6
The effect of oseltamivir use in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter propensity score-matched study.奥司他韦用于危重症COVID-19患者的效果:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Jul;31(7):1210-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 23.
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2021 Oct;84(4):299-316. doi: 10.4046/trd.2021.0075. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
The proportion and effect of corticosteroid therapy in patients with COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 感染患者中皮质类固醇治疗的比例和效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0249481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249481. eCollection 2021.
5
Treatment profiles and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients at private hospital in Jakarta.雅加达一家私立医院新冠肺炎患者的治疗情况及临床结果
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250147. eCollection 2021.
6
Effect of COVID-19 medications on corrected QT interval and induction of torsade de pointes: Results of a multicenter national survey.COVID-19 药物对校正 QT 间期的影响和尖端扭转型室性心动过速的诱导:一项多中心全国性调查的结果。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14182. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14182. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Infliximab and Intravenous Gammaglobulin in Hospitalized Severe COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care Unit.英夫利昔单抗和静脉注射免疫球蛋白用于重症监护病房中住院的重症COVID-19患者
Arch Iran Med. 2021 Feb 1;24(2):139-143. doi: 10.34172/aim.2021.22.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin in COVID-19 treatment.一项关于氯喹和羟氯喹作为单一疗法或联合阿奇霉素治疗 COVID-19 的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77748-x.
9
A retrospective comparison of drugs against COVID-19.抗 COVID-19 药物的回顾性比较。
Virus Res. 2021 Mar;294:198262. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198262. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
10
Many meta-analyses of rare events in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were underpowered.许多在 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中的罕见事件的荟萃分析都没有足够的效力。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;131:113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 30.