Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
American Institutes for Research, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Psychosom Res. 2023 Jan;164:111097. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111097. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
To examine the agreement between, and adherence to, wrist actigraphy and digital sleep diaries as methods for sleep assessment among high-risk adolescents in the 28 days following discharge from acute psychiatric care. Sleep parameters included: number of nighttime awakenings (NWAK), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and wake after sleep onset (WASO).
Fifty-three adolescents (12-18 years) were recruited following discharge from acute psychiatric care for suicide risk. Adolescents completed a baseline assessment followed by a 28-day monitoring period with daily sleep diaries and continuous wrist actigraphy. Bland-Altman and multi-level models examined agreement.
Adherence to actigraphy was high, but lower for sleep diaries; a similar pattern of adherence emerged on weekdays vs. weekends. Bland-Altman analyses revealed no clinically meaningful bias for sleep parameters (except NWAK), but the limits of agreement make interpretation ambiguous. Our base model indicated strong agreement between actigraphy and sleep diaries for TST (r = 0.850), moderate for SOL (r = 0.325) and SE (r = 0.322), and weak for WASO (r = -0.049) and NWAK (r = 0.114). A similar pattern emerged with the insomnia severity models with baseline insomnia influencing agreement on all parameters. There were significant weekday-weekend differences for WASO and NWAK, but not for SOL, SE, and TST.
Results suggest that it may be beneficial to find a modeling approach to account for the concordant and discordant information and relevant time-level variables.
研究腕动描记法和数字睡眠日记作为急性精神科护理后 28 天内高危青少年睡眠评估方法的一致性和依从性。睡眠参数包括:夜间觉醒次数(NWAK)、睡眠效率(SE)、睡眠潜伏期(SOL)、总睡眠时间(TST)和睡眠后觉醒时间(WASO)。
从急性精神病院出院后,招募了 53 名有自杀风险的青少年进行研究。青少年完成基线评估后,进行为期 28 天的监测,每天填写睡眠日记并连续进行腕动描记法监测。 Bland-Altman 分析和多水平模型检查了一致性。
腕动描记法的依从性较高,但睡眠日记的依从性较低;工作日和周末的依从性模式相似。 Bland-Altman 分析显示,除了 NWAK,所有睡眠参数均无临床意义的偏差,但一致性的界限使解释变得模糊。我们的基本模型表明,腕动描记法和睡眠日记在 TST(r=0.850)方面具有很强的一致性,在 SOL(r=0.325)和 SE(r=0.322)方面具有中度一致性,在 WASO(r=-0.049)和 NWAK(r=0.114)方面具有较弱的一致性。基线失眠影响所有参数一致性的失眠严重程度模型也呈现出类似的模式。 WASO 和 NWAK 存在显著的工作日-周末差异,但 SOL、SE 和 TST 没有差异。
结果表明,可能需要找到一种建模方法来解释一致和不一致的信息以及相关的时间水平变量,这可能是有益的。