Member of Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University - Tehran Medical Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Oral Medicine, Member of the dental material research center, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University - Tehran Medical Branch, No.9, Neyestan 9, Pasdaran St., Tehran, Iran.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02576-6.
AIMS & BACKGROUND: Pilocarpine is an accepted treatment for xerostomia, but limited research has been conducted on the oral, topical form. The present study aimed to compare the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash on xerostomic participants.
In this double-blind clinical trial study, 48 subjects with xerostomia were randomly divided into three groups to measure the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine and placebo mouthwashes on saliva levels. The amount of saliva in the 1st and 14th days was measured at 0, 45, 60, and 75 mins, while participants used their mouthwash three times a day for 14 days. On the 1st and 14th days, they filled out the information forms on xerostomia and the medicine's side effects before and after the intervention.
On the 1st day, the mean salivary flow at 45, 60, and 75 mins in the 2 and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash were significantly higher than in the placebo mouthwash group (p < 0.05). On the 14th day, the mean salivary flow time at 45 mins in the 2% pilocarpine mouthwash group was significantly higher than in the placebo mouthwash group (p = 0.007). Furthermore, the mean salivary flow at 60 and 75 mins in the 2% (p < 0.001) and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash (p = 0.028) was significantly higher than in the placebo group. Moreover, the salivary flow in the 2% pilocarpine mouthwash group was significantly higher than the 1% pilocarpine mouthwash (p < 0.05) during these two times. No side effects were observed in any of the subjects.
The study showed that 5 ml of 2 and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash for 2 weeks increased salivary flow in xerostomic participants compared to placebo without any side effects.
毛果芸香碱是治疗口干症的一种公认的治疗方法,但对口含和局部用形式的研究有限。本研究旨在比较 1%和 2%毛果芸香碱漱口液对口干症患者的影响。
在这项双盲临床试验研究中,将 48 名口干症患者随机分为三组,以测量 1%和 2%毛果芸香碱和安慰剂漱口液对唾液水平的影响。在第 1 天和第 14 天,在 0、45、60 和 75 分钟时测量唾液量,同时患者每天使用漱口液三次,共 14 天。在第 1 天和第 14 天,他们在干预前后填写口干症信息表和药物副作用信息表。
第 1 天,2%和 1%毛果芸香碱漱口液在 45、60 和 75 分钟时的平均唾液流量明显高于安慰剂漱口液组(p<0.05)。第 14 天,2%毛果芸香碱漱口液组在 45 分钟时的平均唾液流量时间明显高于安慰剂漱口液组(p=0.007)。此外,2%(p<0.001)和 1%(p=0.028)毛果芸香碱漱口液在 60 和 75 分钟时的平均唾液流量明显高于安慰剂组。此外,在这两个时间点,2%毛果芸香碱漱口液组的唾液流量明显高于 1%毛果芸香碱漱口液组(p<0.05)。在任何受试者中均未观察到不良反应。
研究表明,与安慰剂相比,2 周内使用 5ml 2%和 1%毛果芸香碱漱口液可增加口干症患者的唾液流量,且无任何不良反应。