Arya Sidharth, Ghosh Abhishek, Mishra Shree, Swami Mukesh Kumar, Prasad Sambhu, Somani Aditya, Basu Aniruddha, Sharma Kshitiz, Padhy Susanta Kumar, Nebhinani Naresh, Singh Lokesh Kumar, Choudhury Shinjini, Basu Debasish, Gupta Rajiv
Department of Psychiatry, State Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Pt BDS University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Department of Psychiatry, Drug De-Addiction and Treatment Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep-Oct;64(5):466-472. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_864_21. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Pandemic and consequent lockdowns are likely to affect the drug market by the sudden disruption of the supply chain. We explored the change in the availability, access, purity, and pricing during lockdown from respondents seeking treatment for drugs, alcohol, and tobacco dependence.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 404 respondents from seven treatment centers across India. A structured questionnaire assessed the change in availability, access, quality, and price of substances used during the first phase (March 24-April 14) and the second phase (April 15-May 3) of lockdown.
A majority of the respondents in treatment used tobacco (63%) and alcohol (52%). Relatively few respondents used opioids (45%) or cannabis (5%). Heroin (44%) was the most common opioid the respondents were treated for. Seventy-five percent, 65%, and 60% of respondents treated for alcohol, tobacco, and opioid problems, respectively, reported a reduction in the availability and access during the first phase of the lockdown. In the second phase, respondents with alcohol and tobacco dependence reported greater availability than those with opioid and cannabis dependence. The reported price of all substances increased more than 50% during the first phase of lockdown and remained higher throughout the second phase. Deterioration in purity was reported by more than half of the people who used opioid.
Lockdown could have affected both licit and illicit drug markets, albeit to a varying degree. The observed changes seemed short-lasting, as suggested by the recovering trends during the second phase of lockdown.
大流行及随之而来的封锁措施可能会因供应链的突然中断而影响药品市场。我们探讨了在封锁期间,寻求药物、酒精和烟草依赖治疗的受访者所面临的药品可得性、获取途径、纯度和价格的变化。
对来自印度七个治疗中心的404名受访者进行了横断面调查。一份结构化问卷评估了封锁第一阶段(3月24日至4月14日)和第二阶段(4月15日至5月3日)期间所使用物质的可得性、获取途径、质量和价格的变化。
接受治疗的受访者中,大多数人使用烟草(63%)和酒精(52%)。相对较少的受访者使用阿片类药物(45%)或大麻(5%)。海洛因(44%)是受访者接受治疗的最常见阿片类药物。分别有75%、65%和60%接受酒精、烟草和阿片类药物问题治疗的受访者报告称,在封锁的第一阶段,药品的可得性和获取途径有所减少。在第二阶段,有酒精和烟草依赖的受访者报告的可得性高于有阿片类药物和大麻依赖的受访者。在封锁的第一阶段,所有物质的报告价格上涨超过50%,并在整个第二阶段保持较高水平。超过一半使用阿片类药物的人报告纯度下降。
封锁可能对合法和非法药品市场都产生了影响,尽管程度不同。正如封锁第二阶段的恢复趋势所表明的那样,观察到的变化似乎是短期的。