• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危型人乳头瘤病毒多重感染是诊断性宫颈环形电切术中宫颈发育异常的关键预测指标:一项回顾性队列分析

HPV High-risk Multiple Infection Is a Key Predictor of Cervical Dysplasia in Diagnostic LEEPs: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

作者信息

Wittenborn Julia, Kupec Tomas, Iborra Severine, Stickeler Elmar, Najjari Laila, Kennes Lieven N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Economics and Business Administration, University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Aug 16;82(12):1387-1396. doi: 10.1055/a-1857-6470. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1055/a-1857-6470
PMID:36467973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9713297/
Abstract

This study aimed to identify predictors for the presence of cervical dysplasia in diagnostic LEEPs (Loop Electrical Excision Procedure) of the cervix. The study was designed as a retrospective single-institution cohort analysis of all patients who underwent LEEP without prior proof of high-grade intraepithelial lesion (diagnostic LEEP) between 2015 and 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of University Hospital Aachen. In order to identify the most meaningful predictive variables for CIN status (CIN2+ or non-CIN2+), multivariate logistic regression was performed and a machine-learning method was used. A total of 849 patients with an indication for loop excision of the cervix were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 125 patients without prior proof of CIN2+ were included into the study. Based on the final multivariate logistic regression model, multiple high-risk HPV infections (p = 0.001), the presence of a T2 transformation zone (p = 0.003) and major lesion changes (p = 0.015) as a result of the colposcopy examination were found to be statistically significant for CIN status based on the diagnostic LEEP. Subsequent ROC analysis showed a high predictive value for the model of 88.35% (AUC). The machine-learning technique (recursive partitioning) identified similar variables as important for CIN status with an accuracy of 75%. For clinical decision-making, the result of the colposcopy examination (T2, major change) as well as the results of HPV testing (multiple high-risk HPV infections) are stronger indicators for clinicians to perform diagnostic excisional procedures of the cervix than the presence of high-grade cytological abnormalities.

摘要

本研究旨在确定宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)诊断中宫颈发育异常存在的预测因素。该研究设计为对2015年至2020年间在亚琛大学医院妇产科接受LEEP(无高级别上皮内病变先前证据的诊断性LEEP)的所有患者进行回顾性单机构队列分析。为了确定CIN状态(CIN2+或非CIN2+)最有意义的预测变量,进行了多因素逻辑回归分析并使用了机器学习方法。共有849例有宫颈环形切除术指征的患者接受了资格评估。最终,125例无CIN2+先前证据的患者被纳入研究。基于最终的多因素逻辑回归模型,发现多重高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染(p = 0.001)、T2转化区的存在(p = 0.003)以及阴道镜检查导致的主要病变变化(p = 0.015)对于基于诊断性LEEP的CIN状态具有统计学意义。随后的ROC分析显示该模型具有88.35%(AUC)的高预测价值。机器学习技术(递归划分)识别出对CIN状态同样重要的变量,准确率为75%。对于临床决策,阴道镜检查结果(T2,主要变化)以及HPV检测结果(多重高危型HPV感染)比高级别细胞学异常的存在更能有力地指示临床医生进行宫颈诊断性切除手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/89bb971b1c5c/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18594140.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/f5adbfad6c32/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18584043.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/ac64ba37fca9/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18594139.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/89bb971b1c5c/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18594140.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/f5adbfad6c32/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18584043.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/ac64ba37fca9/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18594139.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a5/9713297/89bb971b1c5c/10-1055-a-1857-6470-i18594140.jpg

相似文献

1
HPV High-risk Multiple Infection Is a Key Predictor of Cervical Dysplasia in Diagnostic LEEPs: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.高危型人乳头瘤病毒多重感染是诊断性宫颈环形电切术中宫颈发育异常的关键预测指标:一项回顾性队列分析
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Aug 16;82(12):1387-1396. doi: 10.1055/a-1857-6470. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
[Stratified research on related risk factors of CINⅡ in CINⅠ patients diagnosed by endocervical curettage under colposcopy].[阴道镜下宫颈管搔刮诊断为CINⅠ患者CINⅡ相关危险因素的分层研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 25;57(8):608-617. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220520-00338.
3
Diagnostic loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for discrepancy: do preoperative factors predict presence of significant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?诊断性环形电切术治疗差异:术前因素能否预测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的存在?
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Apr;11(2):69-72. doi: 10.1097/01.lgt.0000244072.21246.04.
4
[Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].[leep术后24个月内宫颈HSIL患者复发情况及其影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;54(8):534-540. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.08.006.
5
Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.CIN患者行环形电切术子宫标本中的残留病灶
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;298(4):805-812. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4881-7. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.阴道镜测量的小病灶大小可能预测转化区大环形切除术标本中不存在宫颈上皮内瘤变。
BJOG. 2017 Feb;124(3):495-502. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14247. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
7
p16 Immunohistochemistry is useful in confirming high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in women with negative HPV testing.p16免疫组化有助于确诊HPV检测阴性女性的高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)。
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015 Mar;34(2):180-6. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000112.
8
Diagnostic excision of the cervix in women over 40 years with human papilloma virus persistency and normal cytology.对40岁以上人乳头瘤病毒持续感染且细胞学检查正常的女性进行宫颈诊断性切除。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 8;3:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100042. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
The role of human papillomavirus testing in the management of women with low-grade abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.人乳头瘤病毒检测在低级别异常女性管理中的作用:多中心随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2010 May;117(6):645-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02519.x.
10
Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的评估与阴道镜下活检和环形电切术(LEEP)的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Dec;286(6):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nanopore sequencing of non-oncogenic oral Papillomaviruses from people living with HIV.对HIV感染者的非致癌性口腔乳头瘤病毒进行纳米孔测序。
Res Sq. 2025 Mar 7:rs.3.rs-6082806. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6082806/v1.
2
Cytology and HPV Co-Testing for Detection of Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Retrospective Study.细胞学与HPV联合检测用于阴道上皮内瘤变的检测:一项回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 19;15(18):4633. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184633.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of the Triple Test Versus Colposcopy for the Diagnosis of Premalignant and Malignant Cervical Lesions.三苯氧胺对癌前和恶性宫颈病变的诊断准确性与阴道镜检查的比较。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Dec 1;21(12):3501-3507. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.12.3501.
2
Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study.阴道镜引导下活检诊断早期宫颈癌的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Feb;299(2):525-532. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4953-8. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
3
Population-Based Incidence Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Era.
人乳头瘤病毒疫苗时代宫颈上皮内瘤变的基于人群的发病率。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):833-837. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3609.
4
A comparison of ThinPrep Imager-assisted with manual screening, and its place in the New Zealand cervical cancer screening program.液基薄层细胞学检测(ThinPrep Imager)辅助人工筛查的比较,及其在新西兰宫颈癌筛查项目中的地位。
Pathology. 2013 Aug;45(5):474-7. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283631d63.
5
2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.2012 年更新的异常宫颈癌筛查试验和癌前病变管理共识指南。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):829-846. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34.
6
2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy.2011 年国际宫颈病理和阴道镜学会阴道镜术语。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):166-72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c.
7
Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阴道镜引导下活检的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1293-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03444.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
8
Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的评估与阴道镜下活检和环形电切术(LEEP)的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Dec;286(6):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.人乳头瘤病毒检测在宫颈癌预防中的应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 2;103(5):368-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq562. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen.引导性宫颈活检的诊断准确性:一项比较同时活检和锥形标本组织病理学的前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):321.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.033. Epub 2010 Jul 14.