Richardson B K
Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;36(4):234-8.
In a study of psychiatric inpatients' perceptions of the seclusion-room experience, 52 voluntarily admitted adult patients in a state hospital were interviewed within 3 days of the experience. An 88-item semistructured interview schedule was used to obtain information on six research questions. Subjects' perceptions of the reasons for their seclusions varied greatly from perceptions of staff members. Findings implied that for some patients seclusion may have been unnecessary, but for others it was beneficial. Subjects who reported out-of-control impulses or pathological intensity of relationships prior to seclusion and who showed positive change in mood, behavior, or thinking toward staff and/or other patients during or after seclusion seem to have benefited from the experience.
在一项关于精神病住院患者对隔离室体验看法的研究中，对一家州立医院52名自愿入院的成年患者在体验隔离室后的3天内进行了访谈。采用一份包含88个条目的半结构化访谈提纲来获取关于六个研究问题的信息。患者对其被隔离原因的看法与工作人员的看法有很大差异。研究结果表明，对一些患者来说，隔离可能没有必要，但对另一些患者则有益。那些在隔离前报告有失控冲动或人际关系病态强度，且在隔离期间或之后对工作人员和/或其他患者的情绪、行为或思维表现出积极变化的患者似乎从这种体验中受益。
