Suppr超能文献

卡尺和超声扫描仪测量正常体重女性皮褶厚度的比较。

Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measured by Caliper and Ultrasound Scanner in Normative Weight Women.

机构信息

Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland.

Department of Fundamentals of Cosmetology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 4;19(23):16230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316230.

Abstract

Obesity is a major issue affecting not only adults but also children in many places of the world. There are numerous methods for estimating the body fat percentage, however, all of those methods are different in terms of availability, accuracy, and the cost of an individual examination. The aim of this study was to compare two relatively easy and widespread measurement methods for assessing skinfold thickness: the BodyMetrix BX2000 ultrasound machine and a classic GPM caliper. Fifty-eight young women aged 19-24 years with normative body weight participated in the study. We found that although the measurements performed by both methods are positively correlated, the obtained values were different. In seven out of nine measured points, these differences were statistically significant. The measurements of skin fat folds with a caliper showed a higher value of subcutaneous tissue compared to ultrasound measurements. Only the values of measurements on the pectoral and mid-axillary did not differ between the methods. We conclude that due to the significant discrepancies in the values of measured skinfold thickness, appropriate measurement tools and dedicated formulas estimating the amount of body fat should be used.

摘要

肥胖是一个全球性的问题,不仅影响成年人,也影响世界上许多地方的儿童。有许多方法可以估算体脂肪百分比,但是,所有这些方法在可用性、准确性和个体检查成本方面都有所不同。本研究的目的是比较两种相对简单且广泛的测量皮肤褶皱厚度的方法:BodyMetrix BX2000 超声机和经典的 GPM 卡尺。我们招募了 58 名年龄在 19-24 岁、体重正常的年轻女性参与研究。我们发现,尽管两种方法的测量值呈正相关,但得到的值却不同。在九个测量点中的七个点上,这些差异具有统计学意义。与超声测量相比,使用卡尺测量皮肤脂肪褶皱的皮下组织值更高。只有在胸肌和中腋两个测量点上,两种方法的测量值没有差异。我们得出结论,由于测量的皮肤褶皱厚度值存在显著差异,因此应该使用适当的测量工具和专门的公式来估算体脂肪量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
The challenges of assessing adiposity in a clinical setting.评估临床环境中肥胖症的挑战。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Oct;20(10):615-626. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-01012-9. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex Differences in Adiposity and Cardiovascular Diseases.肥胖与心血管疾病的性别差异。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 19;23(16):9338. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169338.
4
Ultrasound as a tool to assess body fat.超声作为评估身体脂肪的工具。
J Obes. 2013;2013:280713. doi: 10.1155/2013/280713. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验