Center for Anti-Infective Agents, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 May;29(5):610-615. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.11.027. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
Antibacterial drug discovery activities are essential for filling clinical pipelines with promising clinical candidates. Little information is available about the challenges and shortcomings of small companies and academic institutions in performing these important discovery tasks.
We performed a content analysis of 463 reviewer comments on 91 funding applications of antibacterial drug discovery projects submitted to two major global funders between 2016 and 2020 that had not proceeded further in the selection process. This quality assessment was complemented with the inputs (via e-mail) from a panel involving six antibiotic research and development (R&D) experts with long-standing expertise and experience in antibiotic drug discovery.
Common critical comments of reviewers are grouped into three main categories: scientific and technical shortcomings, unclear potential societal impact, and insufficient capability and expertise of the project team regarding the R&D process. Insufficient characterization of in vitro activity and/or testing of the hits/leads and insufficient antibacterial activity were the most common critical comments. Other areas of concern were insufficient or lack of differentiation from available drugs or projects with a long R&D history, and the research team's insufficient knowledge of a structured streamlined R&D process as reflected in severe gaps in the expertise of the R&D team. Little appreciation for the problem of the emergence of target-based resistance, especially in single-target approaches, and little awareness of toxicological issues, including approaches with historical liabilities were also commonly mentioned. The shortcomings identified through the analysis of funding applications are echoed by the results of the expert panel.
Our analysis identified an urgent need of strengthening the support for antibacterial drug discovery teams to help more projects reach such a quality to be eligible for global funders and private investors.
抗菌药物发现活动对于用有前途的临床候选药物充实临床管线至关重要。关于小型公司和学术机构在执行这些重要发现任务方面的挑战和不足之处,信息很少。
我们对 2016 年至 2020 年间向两家主要全球资助机构提交的 91 项抗菌药物发现项目的 463 份评审意见进行了内容分析,这些项目在选择过程中没有进一步进行。通过电子邮件向一个由六名具有长期抗生素研发经验和专长的专家组成的小组征求意见,对该质量评估进行了补充。
评审员的常见批评意见分为三个主要类别:科学和技术上的不足、潜在社会影响不明确以及项目团队在研发过程方面的能力和专业知识不足。对体外活性的充分表征和/或对命中/先导化合物的测试以及抗菌活性不足是最常见的批评意见。其他令人关注的领域包括与现有药物或具有长期研发历史的项目相比,缺乏差异化,以及研究团队对结构化简化研发流程的知识不足,这反映在研发团队的专业知识严重差距上。对基于靶标的耐药性出现的问题重视不够,尤其是在单靶标方法中,对毒理学问题的认识不足,包括具有历史负债的方法,这些问题也经常被提及。通过对资助申请的分析确定的不足之处与专家小组的结果相呼应。
我们的分析确定了迫切需要加强对抗菌药物发现团队的支持,以帮助更多的项目达到符合全球资助机构和私人投资者的质量标准。