Blum Christian R, Fitch W Tecumseh, Bugnyar Thomas
Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Haidlhof Research Station, University of Vienna and University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Front Zool. 2022 Dec 12;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12983-022-00477-6.
Predator avoidance can have immense impacts on fitness, yet individual variation in the expression of anti-predator behaviour remains largely unexplained. Existing research investigating learning of novel predators has focused either on individuals or groups, but not both. Testing in individual settings allows evaluations of learning or personality differences, while testing in group settings makes it impossible to distinguish any such individual differences from social dynamics. In this study, we investigate the effect of social dynamics on individual anti-predator behaviour. We trained 15 captive ravens to recognize and respond to a novel experimental predator and then exposed them to this predator in both group and isolation settings across 1.5 years to tease apart individual differences from social effects and evaluate two hypotheses: (1) weaker anti-predator responses of some individuals in the group occurred, because they failed to recognize the experimental predator as a threat, leading to weak responses when separated, or (2) some individuals had learned the new threat, but their scolding intensity was repressed in the group trials due to social dynamics (such as dominance rank), leading to increased scolding intensity when alone.
We found that dominance significantly influences scolding behaviour in the group trials; top-ranked individuals scold more and earlier than lower ranking ones. However, in the separation trials scolding duration is no longer affected by rank.
We speculate that, while top-ranked individuals use their anti-predator responses to signal status in the group, lower-ranking ravens may be suppressed from, or are less capable of, performing intense anti-predator behaviour while in the group. This suggests that, in addition to its recruitment or predator-deterrent effects, alarm calling may serve as a marker of individual quality to conspecifics.
躲避捕食者会对适应性产生巨大影响,但反捕食行为表达中的个体差异在很大程度上仍未得到解释。现有的关于学习识别新捕食者的研究要么聚焦于个体,要么聚焦于群体,而非两者兼顾。在个体环境中进行测试能够评估学习情况或个性差异,而在群体环境中进行测试则无法将任何此类个体差异与社会动态区分开来。在本研究中,我们探究了社会动态对个体反捕食行为的影响。我们训练了15只圈养的乌鸦来识别并对一种新型实验性捕食者做出反应,然后在1.5年的时间里,在群体和隔离环境中让它们接触这种捕食者,以区分个体差异与社会影响,并评估两个假设:(1)群体中一些个体的反捕食反应较弱,是因为它们未能将实验性捕食者识别为威胁,导致在隔离时反应较弱;或者(2)一些个体已经学会了新的威胁,但在群体试验中,由于社会动态(如优势等级),它们的鸣叫强度受到了抑制,导致单独时鸣叫强度增加。
我们发现,在群体试验中,优势等级显著影响鸣叫行为;高等级个体比低等级个体鸣叫更多、更早。然而,在隔离试验中,鸣叫持续时间不再受等级影响。
我们推测,虽然高等级个体利用它们的反捕食反应在群体中表明地位,但低等级乌鸦在群体中可能会受到抑制,或者不太能够表现出强烈的反捕食行为。这表明,除了其召集或威慑捕食者的作用外,警报鸣叫可能作为个体质量的一个标志向同种个体传达信息。