Suppr超能文献

采用聚类分析鉴定慢性肺曲霉病的不同免疫表型。

Identification of distinct immunophenotypes in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis using cluster analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2023 Apr;66(4):299-303. doi: 10.1111/myc.13553. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) has different immunophenotypes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify different CPA immunophenotypes using cluster analysis.

METHODS

We used a subject-centred multivariate clustering approach without prior assumptions to identify CPA phenotypes. We retrospectively included the data of treatment-naïve subjects with CPA and excluded subjects with asthma and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). We performed a scalable two-step cluster analysis using the log-likelihood distance measures to identify CPA phenotypes based on the blood immunological profile (total IgE, eosinophil count and Aspergillus-specific IgE and IgG).

RESULTS

We included 351 CPA subjects and found two clusters. Cluster 2 (n = 118) had significantly higher serum total IgE, peripheral blood eosinophil count, and serum A. fumigatus-specific IgE and IgG than cluster 1 (n = 233). Cluster 2 subjects had a lower FEV1:FVC ratio on spirometry and were more likely to have a fungal ball (88 [74.6%] vs. 145 (62.2%), p = .023) on the CT thorax than cluster 1. After treatment discontinuation, cluster 2 had a longer median (interquartile range) time to relapse than cluster 1 (11.5 [7.3-27.4] vs. 4 [1.1-8.9] months, p = .005).

CONCLUSION

We identified two distinct CPA phenotypes, type-2 dominant and non-type-2, with different clinical and radiological findings and treatment outcomes. Future studies should confirm our findings and investigate different treatment strategies based on CPA phenotypes.

摘要

背景

慢性肺曲霉病(CPA)是否具有不同的免疫表型尚不清楚。

目的

使用聚类分析确定不同的 CPA 免疫表型。

方法

我们使用无先验假设的以个体为中心的多变量聚类方法来确定 CPA 表型。我们回顾性纳入了未经治疗的 CPA 患者的数据,并排除了哮喘和变应性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)患者。我们使用对数似然距离测量进行了可扩展的两步聚类分析,根据血液免疫谱(总 IgE、嗜酸性粒细胞计数以及曲霉特异性 IgE 和 IgG)来确定 CPA 表型。

结果

我们纳入了 351 例 CPA 患者,发现了两个聚类。聚类 2(n=118)的血清总 IgE、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数以及血清烟曲霉特异性 IgE 和 IgG 显著高于聚类 1(n=233)。聚类 2 患者的肺功能检查 FEV1/FVC 比值较低,且更有可能在 CT 胸部上出现真菌球(88[74.6%]例比 145[62.2%]例,p=0.023)。停止治疗后,聚类 2 的中位(四分位距)复发时间长于聚类 1(11.5[7.3-27.4]个月比 4[1.1-8.9]个月,p=0.005)。

结论

我们确定了两种不同的 CPA 表型,即 2 型主导型和非 2 型型,它们具有不同的临床和影像学表现以及治疗结果。未来的研究应证实我们的发现,并根据 CPA 表型探索不同的治疗策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验