Birgier Debora Pricila, Lundh Christer, Haberfeld Yitchak, Elldér Erik
The Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Centre for Economic Demography, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Eur J Popul. 2022 Aug 30;38(5):1033-1064. doi: 10.1007/s10680-022-09634-3. eCollection 2022 Dec.
A standard proposition in the migration literature is that emigrants are not drawn randomly from their source population, but rather compose a self-selected group in terms of labour market characteristics. Such self-selection refers to observed characteristics, such as education, or occupation, as well as unobserved characteristics such as cognitive abilities. However, due to data limitations, most previous studies on selectivity have analysed immigrants' characteristics at destinations rather than using data from their source countries. This paper assesses emigrants' selectivity patterns by following the full-risk population of natives over a long period of time (over 20 years). It also includes an innovative measure of selectivity on unobserved characteristics-namely, school performance-as a proxy for individual motivation and cognitive abilities, and it compares it to the widely used measure of income residuals. We use Swedish register data and assess the probabilities of leaving Sweden between 1993 and 2014 among men and women born in Sweden between 1975 and 1978. We further look for differences among Swedish emigrants who chose different countries of destination. The findings suggest that emigrants are positively self-selected in terms of their observed characteristics, whereas selectivity patterns in terms of unobserved characteristics are more complex. When we assess unobservable characteristics using compulsory school grades as a proxy, emigrants are found to be positively self-selected, while when using income residuals, we find that the effect is U-shaped. Individuals leaving to non-Nordic countries are also found to be more positively self-selected than those heading to neighbouring countries. We discuss these findings and their implications in light of economic and sociological theories.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10680-022-09634-3.
移民文献中的一个标准观点是,移民并非从其来源人群中随机抽取,而是在劳动力市场特征方面构成一个自我选择的群体。这种自我选择涉及到可观察到的特征,如教育程度或职业,以及不可观察到的特征,如认知能力。然而,由于数据限制,以前关于选择性的大多数研究分析的是移民在目的地的特征,而不是使用其来源国的数据。本文通过长期(超过20年)跟踪本国全风险人群来评估移民的选择性模式。它还包括一种关于不可观察特征的创新选择性衡量标准——即学业成绩——作为个人动机和认知能力的代理,并将其与广泛使用的收入残差衡量标准进行比较。我们使用瑞典登记数据,评估1975年至1978年出生在瑞典的男性和女性在1993年至2014年期间离开瑞典的概率。我们进一步寻找选择不同目的地国家的瑞典移民之间的差异。研究结果表明,就可观察到的特征而言,移民是积极自我选择的,而在不可观察特征方面的选择性模式则更为复杂。当我们使用义务教育成绩作为代理来评估不可观察特征时,发现移民是积极自我选择的,而使用收入残差时,我们发现效果呈U形。还发现前往非北欧国家的个人比前往邻国的个人更积极地自我选择。我们根据经济和社会学理论讨论这些发现及其影响。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10680-022-09634-3获取的补充材料。