• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资源匮乏和 COVID-19 扰乱背景下,中低收入国家延长人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种时间间隔的潜在获益:一项数学建模分析。

Potential benefit of extended dose schedules of human papillomavirus vaccination in the context of scarce resources and COVID-19 disruptions in low-income and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling analysis.

机构信息

Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, QC, Canada.

Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jan;11(1):e48-e58. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00475-2.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00475-2
PMID:36521952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9764452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts recommended that an extended interval of 3-5 years between the two doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine could be considered to alleviate vaccine supply shortages. However, three concerns have limited the introduction of extended schedules: girls could be infected between the two doses, the vaccination coverage for the second dose could be lower at ages 13-14 years than at ages 9-10 years, and identifying girls vaccinated with a first dose to give them the second dose could be difficult. Using mathematical modelling, we examined the potential effect of these concerns on the population-level impact and efficiency of extended dose HPV vaccination schedules.

METHODS

We used HPV-ADVISE, an individual-based, transmission-dynamic model of multitype HPV infection and disease, calibrated to country-specific data for four low-income and middle-income countries (India, Viet Nam, Uganda, and Nigeria). For the extended dose scenarios, we varied the vaccination coverage of the second dose among girls previously vaccinated, the one-dose vaccine efficacy, and the one-dose vaccine duration of protection. We also examined a strategy in which girls aged 14 years were vaccinated irrespective of their previous vaccination status. We used a scenario of girls-only two-dose vaccination at age 9 years (vaccine=9 valent, vaccine-type efficacy=100%, duration of protection=lifetime, and coverage=80%) as our comparator. We estimated two outcomes: the relative reduction in the age-standardised cervical cancer incidence (population-level impact) and the number of cervical cancers averted per 100 000 doses (efficiency).

FINDINGS

Our model projected substantial reductions in cervical cancer incidence over 100 years with the two-dose schedule (79-86% depending on the country), compared with no vaccination. Projections for the 5-year extended schedule, in which the second dose is given only to girls previously vaccinated at age 9 years, were similar to the current two-dose schedule, unless vaccination coverage of the second dose is very low (reductions in cervical cancer incidence of 71-78% assuming 30% coverage at age 14 years among girls vaccinated at age 9 years). However, when the dose at age 14 years is given to girls irrespective of vaccination status and assuming high vaccination coverage, the model projected a substantially greater reduction in cervical cancer incidence compared with the current two-dose schedule (reductions in cervical cancer incidence of 86-93% assuming 70% coverage at age 14 years, irrespective of vaccination status). Efficiency of the extended schedule was greater than the two-dose schedule, even with a drop in vaccination coverage.

INTERPRETATION

The three concerns are unlikely to have a substantial effect on the population-level impact of extended dose schedules. Hence, extended dose schedules will likely provide similar cervical cancer reductions as two-dose schedules, while reducing the number of doses required in the short-term, providing a more efficient use of scarce resources, and offering a 5-year time window to reassess the necessity of the second dose.

FUNDING

WHO, Canadian Institute of Health Research Foundation, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, Digital Research Alliance of Canada, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)战略咨询专家组建议,HPV 疫苗两剂之间的间隔时间可延长至 3-5 年,以缓解疫苗供应短缺的问题。然而,有三个问题限制了延长接种时间表的引入:女孩在两剂疫苗接种之间可能会被感染,在 13-14 岁时接种第二剂疫苗的覆盖率可能低于 9-10 岁时的覆盖率,并且确定接种了第一剂疫苗的女孩以接种第二剂疫苗可能具有一定难度。我们使用数学模型,研究了这些问题对 HPV 疫苗延长接种计划的人群影响和效率的潜在影响。

方法

我们使用 HPV-ADVISE,一种基于个体的多型 HPV 感染和疾病传播动力学模型,针对四个低收入和中等收入国家(印度、越南、乌干达和尼日利亚)的具体数据进行了校准。对于延长剂量方案,我们改变了之前接种过疫苗的女孩第二剂疫苗的接种覆盖率、一剂疫苗的疗效和一剂疫苗的保护期。我们还研究了一种策略,即 14 岁的女孩无论之前的接种状况如何都可以接种疫苗。我们将女孩仅在 9 岁时进行两剂疫苗接种的方案(疫苗=九价,疫苗型效力=100%,保护期=终身,覆盖率=80%)作为对照。我们估计了两个结果:年龄标准化宫颈癌发病率的相对降低(人群影响)和每 100000 剂疫苗可预防的宫颈癌病例数(效率)。

结果

与不接种疫苗相比,两剂疫苗接种方案在 100 年内可显著降低宫颈癌发病率(取决于国家,降低 79-86%)。在仅对 9 岁时接种过疫苗的女孩接种第二剂的 5 年延长方案中,预测结果与目前的两剂方案相似,除非第二剂疫苗的接种覆盖率非常低(在 9 岁时接种疫苗的女孩中,假设 14 岁时女孩的接种覆盖率为 30%,宫颈癌发病率降低 71-78%)。然而,如果在 14 岁时为女孩接种一剂疫苗,而不论其接种状况如何,并假设高接种覆盖率,与目前的两剂方案相比,模型预测宫颈癌发病率将显著降低(假设在 14 岁时的覆盖率为 70%,无论接种状况如何,宫颈癌发病率降低 86-93%)。即使接种覆盖率下降,延长方案的效率也高于两剂方案。

结论

这三个问题不太可能对 HPV 疫苗延长接种计划的人群影响产生重大影响。因此,与两剂方案相比,延长接种计划可能会提供类似的宫颈癌减少效果,同时在短期内减少所需的剂量数,更有效地利用稀缺资源,并提供 5 年的时间窗口来重新评估第二剂疫苗的必要性。

资金来源

世界卫生组织、加拿大卫生研究院基金会、魁北克省卫生研究基金会、加拿大数字研究联盟和比尔和梅琳达盖茨基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/41dddc80365a/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/b79a98a8a3e3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/392b81effe7e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/af95fd2c1731/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/96a894d2910a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/41dddc80365a/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/b79a98a8a3e3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/392b81effe7e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/af95fd2c1731/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/96a894d2910a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8090/9764452/41dddc80365a/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Potential benefit of extended dose schedules of human papillomavirus vaccination in the context of scarce resources and COVID-19 disruptions in low-income and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling analysis.资源匮乏和 COVID-19 扰乱背景下,中低收入国家延长人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种时间间隔的潜在获益:一项数学建模分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jan;11(1):e48-e58. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00475-2.
2
Potential population-level effectiveness of one-dose HPV vaccination in low-income and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling analysis.在中低收入国家,一剂 HPV 疫苗接种的潜在人群效力:一项数学建模分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Oct;8(10):e788-e799. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00180-9.
3
Optimal human papillomavirus vaccination strategies to prevent cervical cancer in low-income and middle-income countries in the context of limited resources: a mathematical modelling analysis.在资源有限的情况下,为预防中低收入国家的宫颈癌,探讨最佳人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种策略:基于数学模型的分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1598-1610. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30860-4. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries.HPV 疫苗接种和宫颈筛查对宫颈癌消除的影响:78 个低收入和中低收入国家的比较建模分析。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):575-590. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30068-4. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis.全球范围内一剂与两剂人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种方案的影响和成本效益比较:建模分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Aug 28;21(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02988-3.
6
Evidence-based impact projections of single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in India: a modelling study.基于证据的印度单次人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种影响预测:建模研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1419-1429. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00543-5. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries.实现世界卫生组织宫颈癌消除目标的死亡率影响:78 个低收入和中低收入国家的比较建模分析。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):591-603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
8
Switching from a 2-dose to a 1-dose program of gender-neutral routine vaccination against human papillomavirus in Canada: a mathematical modelling analysis.在加拿大,将针对 HPV 的两性通用常规免疫接种从 2 剂方案转换为 1 剂方案:一项数学建模分析。
CMAJ. 2024 Oct 6;196(33):E1136-E1143. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.240787.
9
Health and economic outcomes of HPV 16,18 vaccination in 72 GAVI-eligible countries.72个符合全球疫苗免疫联盟(GAVI)资助条件的国家中HPV 16、18疫苗接种的健康和经济成果。
Vaccine. 2008 Jul 29;26(32):4080-93. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.053. Epub 2008 May 15.
10
Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020-99: a modelling study.在 181 个国家/地区扩大人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种和宫颈癌筛查的影响,以及在 2020-99 年全球消除宫颈癌的可能性:一项建模研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):394-407. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30836-2. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming challenges and achieving high HPV vaccination uptake in Cameroon: lessons learned from a gender-neutral and single-dose program and community engagement.在喀麦隆克服挑战并提高人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种率:从性别中立单剂量计划和社区参与中学到的经验教训
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1696. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22776-3.
2
Modelling epidemiological and economics processes - the case of cervical cancer.模拟流行病学和经济过程——以宫颈癌为例。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Feb 22;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1.
3
Single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination: an update.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based impact projections of single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in India: a modelling study.基于证据的印度单次人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种影响预测:建模研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1419-1429. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00543-5. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
2
Efficacy of single-dose HPV vaccination among young African women.单次 HPV 疫苗接种在年轻非洲女性中的效果。
NEJM Evid. 2022 Jun;1(5):EVIDoa2100056. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100056. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Vaccine efficacy against persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 infection at 10 years after one, two, and three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine in girls in India: a multicentre, prospective, cohort study.
单剂人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种:更新。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Nov 1;2024(67):313-316. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae030.
4
Optimal human papillomavirus vaccination strategies in the context of vaccine supply constraints in 100 countries.100个国家疫苗供应受限情况下的人乳头瘤病毒最佳疫苗接种策略
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 18;74:102735. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102735. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Inferring the natural history of HPV from global cancer registries: insights from a multi-country calibration.从全球癌症登记处推断 HPV 的自然史:多国校准的见解。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 10;14(1):15875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65842-3.
6
Distribution patterns of human papillomavirus genotypes among women in Guangzhou, China.中国广州女性人乳头瘤病毒基因型的分布模式
Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Oct 31;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00541-8.
7
Potential population-level effectiveness of one-dose HPV vaccination in low-income and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling analysis.在中低收入国家,一剂 HPV 疫苗接种的潜在人群效力:一项数学建模分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Oct;8(10):e788-e799. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00180-9.
8
Human papillomavirus vaccination strategies for accelerating action towards cervical cancer elimination.加速消除宫颈癌行动的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种策略
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jan;11(1):e4-e5. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00511-3.
印度一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究:在印度女孩中,接种一剂、两剂和三剂四价 HPV 疫苗 10 年后,对持续性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)16/18 感染的疫苗效力。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1518-1529. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00453-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent vaccinations: projected time to reverse deficits in routine adolescent vaccination in the United States.COVID-19 大流行对青少年疫苗接种的影响:预计美国常规青少年疫苗接种不足得到扭转所需的时间。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Dec;37(12):2077-2087. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1981842. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Optimal human papillomavirus vaccination strategies to prevent cervical cancer in low-income and middle-income countries in the context of limited resources: a mathematical modelling analysis.在资源有限的情况下,为预防中低收入国家的宫颈癌,探讨最佳人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种策略:基于数学模型的分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1598-1610. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30860-4. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
6
National introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in Tanzania: Programmatic decision-making and implementation.坦桑尼亚全国推广人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗:政策决策与实施。
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 31;40 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):A2-A9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.025. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Continued HPV vaccination in the face of unexpected challenges: A commentary on the rationale for an extended interval two-dose schedule.面对意外挑战时持续进行人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种:关于延长间隔两剂次接种方案基本原理的评论
Vaccine. 2021 Feb 5;39(6):871-875. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.031. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
HPV vaccination introduction worldwide and WHO and UNICEF estimates of national HPV immunization coverage 2010-2019.HPV 疫苗接种在全球范围内的推广情况以及世卫组织和儿基会对 2010-2019 年各国 HPV 免疫接种覆盖率的估计。
Prev Med. 2021 Mar;144:106399. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106399. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
9
Human papillomavirus vaccine coverage in Rwanda: A population-level analysis by birth cohort.卢旺达的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率:按出生队列进行的人群水平分析。
Vaccine. 2020 May 19;38(24):4001-4005. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
10
HPV-FRAME: A consensus statement and quality framework for modelled evaluations of HPV-related cancer control.HPV框架:人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症控制模型评估的共识声明和质量框架
Papillomavirus Res. 2019 Dec;8:100184. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100184. Epub 2019 Sep 7.