• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Abortion policy implementation in Ireland: successes and challenges in the establishment of hospital-based services.爱尔兰堕胎政策的实施:建立医院服务体系中的成功与挑战
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100090.
2
Abortion policy implementation in Ireland: Lessons from the community model of care.爱尔兰堕胎政策的实施:社区关怀模式的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2022 May 9;17(5):e0264494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264494. eCollection 2022.
3
Restrictive points of entry into abortion care in Ireland: a qualitative study of expectations and experiences with the service.爱尔兰堕胎护理准入限制点:对服务期望和体验的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2215567. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2215567.
4
Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study.南非的良心拒绝及其对堕胎服务提供的影响:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2014 Feb 26;11(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-16.
5
: a qualitative study on providers' lived experiences with liberalised abortion care in the Republic of Ireland.: 一项关于爱尔兰共和国提供者在放宽堕胎护理方面的生活体验的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2216526. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2216526.
6
Shaping legal abortion provision in Ghana: using policy theory to understand provider-related obstacles to policy implementation.塑造加纳的合法堕胎规定:利用政策理论理解与提供者相关的政策执行障碍。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Jul 6;11:23. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-23.
7
Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons.助产士和护士出于良心拒接参与堕胎工作:原因的系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 27;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0268-3.
8
The role of healthcare providers in expanding legal abortion: Qualitative insights from Argentina, Ireland, and South Korea.医疗保健提供者在扩大合法堕胎中的作用:来自阿根廷、爱尔兰和韩国的定性见解。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;164 Suppl 1:21-30. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15333.
9
"We don't want problems": reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia.“我们不希望有问题”:墨西哥和玻利维亚基于良心拒绝堕胎的理由。
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01101-2.
10
"Sometimes you have knowledge but lack the equipment to save a life": perspectives on health system barriers to post-abortion care in Liberia and Sierra Leone.“有时你有知识,但却缺乏拯救生命的设备”:关于利比里亚和塞拉利昂堕胎后护理的卫生系统障碍的观点
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;82(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01446-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence.护士和助产士的堕胎学习机制:证据的范围综述
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2518672. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2518672. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
2
Progress in providing legal abortion services after law reform: A quantitative study in three provinces of Argentina.法律改革后提供合法堕胎服务的进展:阿根廷三个省份的定量研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;5(2):e0003526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003526. eCollection 2025.
3
Step by Step in Argentina: Putting Abortion Rights into Practice.阿根廷的步步征程:将堕胎权利付诸实践。
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jul 11;15:1003-1015. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S412975. eCollection 2023.
4
: a qualitative study on providers' lived experiences with liberalised abortion care in the Republic of Ireland.: 一项关于爱尔兰共和国提供者在放宽堕胎护理方面的生活体验的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2216526. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2216526.
5
Restrictive points of entry into abortion care in Ireland: a qualitative study of expectations and experiences with the service.爱尔兰堕胎护理准入限制点:对服务期望和体验的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2215567. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2215567.

本文引用的文献

1
Abortion policy implementation in Ireland: Lessons from the community model of care.爱尔兰堕胎政策的实施:社区关怀模式的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2022 May 9;17(5):e0264494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264494. eCollection 2022.
2
"The kind of doctor who doesn't believe doctor knows best": Doctors for Choice and the medical voice in Irish abortion politics, 2002-2018.“不相信医生最懂的医生”:选择医生与爱尔兰堕胎政治中的医学声音,2002-2018 年。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;297:114817. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114817. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Attitudes and experiences with termination of pregnancy among Irish obstetrics & gynaecology trainees in the context of recent legal change: A survey study.近期法律变革背景下爱尔兰妇产科实习医生对终止妊娠的态度与经历:一项调查研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2021 Oct 30;13:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100137. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Termination of pregnancy services: a year in review in a tertiary maternity hospital.终止妊娠服务:一家三级妇产医院的年度回顾
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Jul;47(3):231-232. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201049. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
5
Termination of pregnancy: Staff knowledge and training.终止妊娠:员工知识与培训。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Jun;28:100613. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100613. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
Fetal medicine specialist experiences of providing a new service of termination of pregnancy for fatal fetal anomaly: a qualitative study.胎儿医学专家提供终止致命性胎儿畸形妊娠服务的经验:一项定性研究。
BJOG. 2021 Mar;128(4):676-684. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16502. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Working in the shadows, under the spotlight - Reflections on lessons learnt in the Republic of Ireland after the first 18 months of more liberal Abortion Care.在幕后工作,站在聚光灯下——关于爱尔兰共和国在更宽松的堕胎护理实施18个月后的经验教训反思
Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):305-307. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
The impact of gynecologists' conscientious objection on abortion access.妇科医生的良心反对对堕胎机会的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Mar;87:102403. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102403. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
"Referendum on Sunday, working group on Monday": A success story of implementing abortion services after legalization in Portugal.“周日公投,周一工作组”:葡萄牙合法化堕胎服务后的成功故事。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143 Suppl 4:31-37. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12675.
10
Implementing and expanding safe abortion care: An international comparative case study of six countries.实施和扩大安全人工流产服务:六个国家的国际比较案例研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143 Suppl 4:3-11. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12671.

爱尔兰堕胎政策的实施:建立医院服务体系中的成功与挑战

Abortion policy implementation in Ireland: successes and challenges in the establishment of hospital-based services.

作者信息

Stifani Bianca M, Mishtal Joanna, Chavkin Wendy, Reeves Karli, Grimes Lorraine, Chakravarty Dyuti, Duffy Deirdre, Murphy Mark, Horgan Trish, Favier Mary, Lavelanet Antonella

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine / Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.

出版信息

SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100090.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100090
PMID:36531297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9748298/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe successes and highlight remaining challenges in the establishment of hospital-based abortion services after legal change in the Republic of Ireland.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study on the implementation of abortion policy in Ireland. In this manuscript, we present the results from a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews conducted with hospital-based providers, service users, and key informants. We used Dedoose software to conduct a thematic analysis of the data.

RESULTS

We report findings from interviews with 28 obstetrician gynecologists, midwives, psychiatrists, anesthesiologists, and nurses; a subset of 7 service users who sought care in hospitals; and 27 key informants. In this analysis, we describe how key themes that pertain to information, capacity and power, facilitated and hindered the implementation of hospital-based abortion services. We found that individual champions are key to establishing the service, but their motivation is not always sufficient to integrate abortion into existing clinical services, and conscientious objection is a persistent barrier to expanding abortion services. The main challenges highlighted here are lack of abortion provision at some hospitals and limited access to surgical abortion at most hospitals due to provider-level, logistical, and infrastructure barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents new information on how abortion policy is implemented on the ground in hospital settings. Its findings can inform public health officials and providers in Ireland and other countries wishing to establish abortion services.

摘要

目的

描述爱尔兰共和国法律变更后建立医院堕胎服务方面的成功之处,并突出尚存的挑战。

方法

我们对爱尔兰堕胎政策的实施开展了一项混合方法研究。在本论文中,我们呈现了对医院提供者、服务使用者和关键信息提供者进行的深入访谈的定性分析结果。我们使用Dedoose软件对数据进行了主题分析。

结果

我们报告了对28名妇产科医生、助产士、精神科医生、麻醉师和护士、7名在医院寻求护理的服务使用者子集以及27名关键信息提供者的访谈结果。在此分析中,我们描述了与信息、能力和权力相关的关键主题如何促进和阻碍了医院堕胎服务的实施。我们发现个人倡导者对于建立该服务至关重要,但他们的积极性并不总是足以将堕胎纳入现有的临床服务,并且出于良心拒绝对扩大堕胎服务而言是一个持续存在的障碍。这里突出的主要挑战是一些医院缺乏堕胎服务,并且由于提供者层面、后勤和基础设施方面的障碍,大多数医院进行手术堕胎的机会有限。

结论

本研究提供了关于堕胎政策在医院环境中实际如何实施的新信息。其研究结果可为爱尔兰以及其他希望建立堕胎服务的国家的公共卫生官员和提供者提供参考。