• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Community-oriented Motivational Interviewing (MI): A novel framework extending MI to address COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in online social media platforms.以社区为导向的动机性访谈(MI):一种将MI扩展以解决在线社交媒体平台上新冠疫苗错误信息的新框架。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Apr;141:107609. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
Addressing Antivaccine Sentiment on Public Social Media Forums Through Web-Based Conversations Based on Motivational Interviewing Techniques: Observational Study.通过基于动机访谈技术的网络对话解决公共社交媒体论坛上的反疫苗情绪:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Nov 14;3:e50138. doi: 10.2196/50138.
3
Preparing student-pharmacists to utilize motivational interviewing techniques to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in underrepresented racial/ethnic patient populations.培养学生药剂师利用动机性访谈技巧,解决代表性不足的种族/族裔患者群体对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Aug;15(8):742-747. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
4
Online misinformation and vaccine hesitancy.网络错误信息与疫苗犹豫
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2194-2199. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab128.
5
Medical Students' Efforts to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Through Motivational Interviewing.医学生通过动机性访谈解决新冠疫苗犹豫问题的努力。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65755. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65755. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Novel Psychosocial Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠疫苗犹豫的新型社会心理关联因素:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 27;7:e45980. doi: 10.2196/45980.
7
Assessing Changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Intentions among the Brigada Digital Latino Social Media Audience: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.评估拉丁裔数字社区社交媒体受众中新冠疫苗接种率和接种意愿的变化:一项重复横断面研究。
Res Sq. 2023 Nov 20:rs.3.rs-3611896. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3611896/v1.
8
Lessons Learned From Interdisciplinary Efforts to Combat COVID-19 Misinformation: Development of Agile Integrative Methods From Behavioral Science, Data Science, and Implementation Science.从跨学科抗击新冠疫情错误信息的努力中吸取的经验教训:行为科学、数据科学和实施科学的敏捷整合方法的发展
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Feb 3;3:e40156. doi: 10.2196/40156. eCollection 2023.
9
Mitigating Misinformation Toolkit: A Medical Student Role-Play Curriculum on Communication Techniques to Facilitate Vaccine Misinformation Conversations.减轻错误信息工具包:医学学生角色扮演课程,教授沟通技巧,以促进有关疫苗错误信息的对话。
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Aug 27;20:11439. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11439. eCollection 2024.
10
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media-Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Literature Review.社交媒体上健康类错误信息的流行情况-在新冠疫情之前、期间和之后的挑战和缓解措施:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e38786. doi: 10.2196/38786.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing Theory-Enhanced Messaging to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.测试理论强化信息以促进新冠疫苗接种:一项随机对照试验的结果
Res Sq. 2025 May 2:rs.3.rs-6472442. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6472442/v1.
2
Collective efficacy: A protective factor for sexual minority men during the U.S. mpox outbreak.集体效能:美国猴痘疫情期间男同性恋者的一个保护因素。
Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;44(3):211-222. doi: 10.1037/hea0001472.
3
Online Misleading Information About Women's Reproductive Health: A Narrative Review.关于女性生殖健康的网络误导性信息:一项叙述性综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09118-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
4
Strategies and bottlenecks to tackle infodemic in public health: a scoping review.应对公共卫生信息疫情的策略和瓶颈:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;12:1438981. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438981. eCollection 2024.
5
Beyond misinformation: developing a public health prevention framework for managing information ecosystems.超越错误信息:制定公共卫生预防框架以管理信息生态系统。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Jun;9(6):e397-e406. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00031-8. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
6
Management of infodemics in outbreaks or health crises: a systematic review.突发疫情或卫生危机中的信息疫情管理:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 15;12:1343902. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1343902. eCollection 2024.
7
Addressing Antivaccine Sentiment on Public Social Media Forums Through Web-Based Conversations Based on Motivational Interviewing Techniques: Observational Study.通过基于动机访谈技术的网络对话解决公共社交媒体论坛上的反疫苗情绪:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Nov 14;3:e50138. doi: 10.2196/50138.
8
'They've all endorsed it…but I'm just not there:' a qualitative exploration of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy reported by Black and Latinx individuals.“他们都支持它……但我就是不那么想:”对黑人和拉丁裔个体报告的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫进行的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e072619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072619.

本文引用的文献

1
Moral reframing of messages about mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间对口罩佩戴信息进行道德重塑。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 22;13(1):10140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37075-3.
2
Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review.新冠病毒阴谋论信念的前因后果:一项系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114912. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114912. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir: Oral Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antiviral Drugs.莫努匹韦和奈玛特韦-利托那韦:口服冠状病毒病 2019 抗病毒药物。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):165-171. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac180.
5
How to Combat Health Misinformation: A Psychological Approach.如何对抗健康错误信息:一种心理学方法。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Mar;36(3):569-575. doi: 10.1177/08901171211070958.
6
The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.揭穿动态社交媒体对话中健康错误信息的挑战:COVID-19 期间公众戴口罩的在线随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):e34831. doi: 10.2196/34831.
7
Cultural adaptations of motivational interviewing: A systematic review.文化适应性动机访谈:系统评价。
Psychol Serv. 2023;20(Suppl 1):7-18. doi: 10.1037/ser0000619. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
The efficacy and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines in reducing infection, severity, hospitalization, and mortality: a systematic review.COVID-19 疫苗在减少感染、严重程度、住院和死亡方面的功效和效果:系统评价。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2027160. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2027160. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
Perceived Risk, Optimistic Bias, and United Action: A socio-ecological examination of COVID-19 prevention behaviors among sexual minority men.感知风险、乐观偏差与联合行动:对男同性恋者中新冠病毒预防行为的社会生态考察
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2021 Jun;8(2):201-212. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000489.
10
Vaccine Hesitancy and Exposure to Misinformation: a Survey Analysis.疫苗犹豫与错误信息暴露:一项调查分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07171-z. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

以社区为导向的动机性访谈(MI):一种将MI扩展以解决在线社交媒体平台上新冠疫苗错误信息的新框架。

Community-oriented Motivational Interviewing (MI): A novel framework extending MI to address COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in online social media platforms.

作者信息

Scales David, Gorman Jack M, DiCaprio Peter, Hurth Lindsay, Radhakrishnan Malavika, Windham Savannah, Akunne Azubuike, Florman Julia, Leininger Lindsey, Starks Tyrel J

机构信息

Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Critica, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Comput Human Behav. 2023 Apr;141:107609. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609
PMID:36531901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9745298/
Abstract

Researchers have linked circulating misinformation in online platforms to low COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Two disparate literatures provide relevant initial guidance to address the problem. Motivational Interviewing (MI) effectively reduces vaccine hesitancy in clinical environments; meanwhile, social scientists note inoculation, rebuttal, and appeals to accuracy are persuasive in digital contexts. A tension is inherent in these approaches. MI in digital forums may induce an 'illusory truth effect,' wherein falsehoods appear more accurate through repetition. Yet, rebutting misinformation directly may elicit backfire or reactance effects, motivating some to amplify their presentation of misinformation. Building on Identity Process Theory, we propose a theoretical framework for conducting MI-based infodemiology interventions among digital communities that conceptualizes the community in toto (rather than one specific person) as the unit of focus. Case examples from interventions on public Facebook posts illustrate three processes unique to such interventions: 1) Navigating tension between addressing commenters and "bystanders"; 2) Activating pro-vaccine bystanders; and 3) Reframing uncertainty or information individuals might find concerning or threatening according to implied collective values. This paper suggests community-oriented MI can maximize persuasive effects on bystanders while minimizing potential reactance from those with committed beliefs, thereby guiding community-oriented public health messaging interventions enacted in digital environments.

摘要

研究人员已将在线平台上传播的错误信息与新冠疫苗接种率低联系起来。有两类不同的文献为解决这一问题提供了相关的初步指导。动机性访谈(MI)能有效降低临床环境中的疫苗犹豫情绪;与此同时,社会科学家指出,接种宣传、反驳错误信息以及呼吁准确性在数字环境中具有说服力。这些方法之间存在内在矛盾。在数字论坛中进行动机性访谈可能会引发“虚幻的真相效应”,即错误信息通过重复会显得更准确。然而,直接反驳错误信息可能会引发反效果或逆反效应,促使一些人更大力地传播错误信息。基于身份认同过程理论,我们提出了一个理论框架,用于在数字社区中开展基于动机性访谈的信息疫情干预,该框架将整个社区(而非某一个特定的人)视为关注单位。针对脸书公共帖子的干预措施中的案例说明了此类干预所特有的三个过程:1)应对评论者和“旁观者”之间的矛盾;2)激活支持疫苗接种的旁观者;3)根据隐含的集体价值观重新构建个人可能认为令人担忧或构成威胁的不确定性或信息。本文表明,以社区为导向的动机性访谈可以最大限度地提高对旁观者的说服效果,同时尽量减少那些秉持坚定信念者的潜在逆反心理,从而为在数字环境中开展的以社区为导向的公共卫生信息干预提供指导。