Scales David, Gorman Jack M, DiCaprio Peter, Hurth Lindsay, Radhakrishnan Malavika, Windham Savannah, Akunne Azubuike, Florman Julia, Leininger Lindsey, Starks Tyrel J
Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Critica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Apr;141:107609. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
Researchers have linked circulating misinformation in online platforms to low COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Two disparate literatures provide relevant initial guidance to address the problem. Motivational Interviewing (MI) effectively reduces vaccine hesitancy in clinical environments; meanwhile, social scientists note inoculation, rebuttal, and appeals to accuracy are persuasive in digital contexts. A tension is inherent in these approaches. MI in digital forums may induce an 'illusory truth effect,' wherein falsehoods appear more accurate through repetition. Yet, rebutting misinformation directly may elicit backfire or reactance effects, motivating some to amplify their presentation of misinformation. Building on Identity Process Theory, we propose a theoretical framework for conducting MI-based infodemiology interventions among digital communities that conceptualizes the community in toto (rather than one specific person) as the unit of focus. Case examples from interventions on public Facebook posts illustrate three processes unique to such interventions: 1) Navigating tension between addressing commenters and "bystanders"; 2) Activating pro-vaccine bystanders; and 3) Reframing uncertainty or information individuals might find concerning or threatening according to implied collective values. This paper suggests community-oriented MI can maximize persuasive effects on bystanders while minimizing potential reactance from those with committed beliefs, thereby guiding community-oriented public health messaging interventions enacted in digital environments.
研究人员已将在线平台上传播的错误信息与新冠疫苗接种率低联系起来。有两类不同的文献为解决这一问题提供了相关的初步指导。动机性访谈(MI)能有效降低临床环境中的疫苗犹豫情绪;与此同时,社会科学家指出,接种宣传、反驳错误信息以及呼吁准确性在数字环境中具有说服力。这些方法之间存在内在矛盾。在数字论坛中进行动机性访谈可能会引发“虚幻的真相效应”,即错误信息通过重复会显得更准确。然而,直接反驳错误信息可能会引发反效果或逆反效应,促使一些人更大力地传播错误信息。基于身份认同过程理论,我们提出了一个理论框架,用于在数字社区中开展基于动机性访谈的信息疫情干预,该框架将整个社区(而非某一个特定的人)视为关注单位。针对脸书公共帖子的干预措施中的案例说明了此类干预所特有的三个过程:1)应对评论者和“旁观者”之间的矛盾;2)激活支持疫苗接种的旁观者;3)根据隐含的集体价值观重新构建个人可能认为令人担忧或构成威胁的不确定性或信息。本文表明,以社区为导向的动机性访谈可以最大限度地提高对旁观者的说服效果,同时尽量减少那些秉持坚定信念者的潜在逆反心理,从而为在数字环境中开展的以社区为导向的公共卫生信息干预提供指导。