Hu Heng-Chang, Zhang Wei, Xiong Pei-Yu, Song Li, Jia Bo, Liu Xing-Long
College of Basic Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 2;13:1043236. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1043236. eCollection 2022.
Accumulated evidence indicates that astragalus polysaccharide (APS) may have a beneficial impact on ulcerative colitis (UC) by suppressing inflammation and decreasing oxidative stress. Nevertheless, the credibility of the evidence for this practice is unclear. Therefore, we intended to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies to assess the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of APS when used in the treatment of UC. Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM), Wanfang Database, CQVIP Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were retrieved for relevant animal studies. The methodological quality of animal studies was evaluated based on the SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE's RoB tool). A meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions by using STATA 12.0 software. This study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42021272595. Twenty qualified publications involving 591 animals were included in this study. There was a significant association of APS with levels of disease activity index (DAI), colon macroscopic damage index (CMDI), colon histopathologic score (CHS), myeloperoxidase (MPO), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) compared with that in the control group. Sensitivity analysis that eliminated one study at each stage did not change these results. Egger's test and funnel plot showed that publication bias was existed. In this meta-analysis, APS treatment significantly mitigated colonic damage by reducing the levels of MPO, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and MDA and recovering the SOD activity. These results demonstrated a protective role of APS in the treatment of UC and showed that the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity were implicated in the underlying mechanisms. Hence, APS may represent a promising candidate for treating UC. However, due to potential publication bias, a cautious interpretation is needed. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).
越来越多的证据表明,黄芪多糖(APS)可能通过抑制炎症和降低氧化应激对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)产生有益影响。然而,这种做法的证据可信度尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在对动物研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估APS用于治疗UC时的抗炎和抗氧化活性。检索了包括PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库、维普数据库和中国知网(CNKI)在内的电子文献数据库,以查找相关动物研究。基于实验动物实验系统评价中心(SYRCLE的RoB工具)对动物研究的方法学质量进行评估。使用STATA 12.0软件根据Cochrane干预系统评价手册进行荟萃分析。本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42021272595。本研究纳入了20篇合格出版物,涉及591只动物。与对照组相比,APS与疾病活动指数(DAI)、结肠宏观损伤指数(CMDI)、结肠组织病理学评分(CHS)、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和丙二醛(MDA)水平之间存在显著关联。在每个阶段剔除一项研究的敏感性分析并未改变这些结果。Egger检验和漏斗图显示存在发表偏倚。在这项荟萃分析中,APS治疗通过降低MPO、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-1β和MDA水平以及恢复SOD活性,显著减轻了结肠损伤。这些结果证明了APS在UC治疗中的保护作用,并表明抗炎和抗氧化活性参与了其潜在机制。因此,APS可能是治疗UC的一个有前途的候选药物。然而,由于潜在的发表偏倚,需要谨慎解读。(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/)