• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥手术患者队列的回顾性观察分析:非体外循环与体外循环对比

Retrospective observational analysis of a coronary artery bypass grafting surgery patient cohort: Off-pump versus on-pump.

作者信息

Rantanen Matias, Yousif Rizgar, Kallioinen Minna, Hynninen Ville-Veikko, Peltoniemi Marko, Söderholm Oki, Saarikoski Tuukka, Anttila Vesa, Aittokallio Jenni

机构信息

Division of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Nov 9;84:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104812. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104812
PMID:36536727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9758289/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether surgical technique has an effect on prognosis in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational.

SETTING

Single center.

PARTICIPANTS

All the off-pump (OPCABG) and on-pump (ONCABG) patients at Turku University Central Hospital in 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After propensity score matching, perioperative, 1-year and 3-year mortality did not differ between the groups. The ONCABG patients received more allogenic red blood cells (1.3 vs. 0.6 units, p = 0.020), autologous red blood cells (564 vs. 285 ml, p < 0.001) and crystalloids (3388 vs. 2808 ml, p < 0.001), and had higher postoperative values of troponin T (581 vs. 222, p = 0.001) and lactate (1.69 vs. 1.23, p < 0.001) than the OPCABG patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The both techniques seem equally safe. However, there may be some benefits to avoiding using a heart-lung machine, such as lower infused fluid volumes. Myocardial damage may also be milder and postoperative hemodynamics more balanced in OPCABG patients, based on lower levels of troponin T and lactate.

摘要

目的

确定手术技术对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)预后是否有影响。

设计

回顾性观察研究。

地点

单中心。

参与者

2018年图尔库大学中心医院所有非体外循环(OPCABG)和体外循环(ONCABG)患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

倾向评分匹配后,两组围手术期、1年和3年死亡率无差异。ONCABG患者输注的异体红细胞更多(1.3单位对0.6单位,p = 0.020)、自体红细胞更多(564毫升对285毫升,p < 0.001)和晶体液更多(3388毫升对2808毫升,p < 0.001),且术后肌钙蛋白T值(581对222,p = 0.001)和乳酸值(1.69对1.23,p < 0.001)高于OPCABG患者。

结论

两种技术似乎同样安全。然而,避免使用心肺机可能有一些益处,如较低的输液量。基于较低的肌钙蛋白T和乳酸水平,OPCABG患者的心肌损伤可能也较轻,术后血流动力学更平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c0/9758289/17d349558078/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c0/9758289/d1ed0d7abef0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c0/9758289/17d349558078/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c0/9758289/d1ed0d7abef0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c0/9758289/17d349558078/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective observational analysis of a coronary artery bypass grafting surgery patient cohort: Off-pump versus on-pump.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者队列的回顾性观察分析:非体外循环与体外循环对比
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Nov 9;84:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104812. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Effect of on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with non-dialysis-dependent severe renal impairment: propensity-matched analysis from the UK registry dataset.非透析依赖型严重肾功能损害患者体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的效果:基于英国注册数据集的倾向匹配分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 13;11:1341123. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1341123. eCollection 2024.
3
A propensity score analysis on the effect of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病患者行体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的效果的倾向评分分析。
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jun;6(6):838-44. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.05.08.
4
Coronary artery bypass grafting in high-RISk patients randomised to off- or on-Pump surgery: a randomised controlled trial (the CRISP trial).高危患者冠状动脉搭桥术随机分组至非体外循环或体外循环手术:一项随机对照试验(CRISP试验)
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jul;18(44):v-xx, 1-157. doi: 10.3310/hta18440.
5
Is off-pump technique a safer procedure for coronary revascularization? A propensity score analysis of 20 years of experience.非体外循环技术用于冠状动脉血运重建是否更安全?一项基于20年经验的倾向评分分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 May;22(5):612-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw005. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
The Effects of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery on Metabolic Profiles in the Early Postoperative Period.体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术对术后早期代谢谱的影响
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):909-16. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
7
Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomized trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉手术对可逆性和不可逆性心肌损伤的影响:一项使用心血管磁共振成像和生化标志物的随机试验
Circulation. 2004 Jan 27;109(3):345-50. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000109489.71945.BD. Epub 2004 Jan 19.
8
Does the number of grafts influence surgeon choice and patient benefit of off-pump over conventional on-pump coronary artery revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease?在多支冠状动脉疾病中,移植物数量是否会影响外科医生对于非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术相对于传统体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的选择以及患者从中获得的益处?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Nov;84(5):1485-94; discussion 1494-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.035.
9
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction: inverse probability weighted study.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗严重左心室功能障碍患者的结局比较:逆概率加权研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Nov 17;22(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02895-0.
10
Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on early and late right ventricular function.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术对右心室早期和晚期功能的影响。
Circulation. 2008 Apr 29;117(17):2202-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735621. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
[Procalcitonin as sepsis predictor in cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass].[降钙素原在体外循环心血管手术中作为脓毒症预测指标的研究]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):802-808. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064366.
2
Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:短期结果
Acta Inform Med. 2023 Jun;31(2):107-110. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.107-110.

本文引用的文献

1
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Meta-Analysis Evaluating High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Kinetics after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Relation to the Current Definitions of Myocardial Infarction.Meta 分析评估冠状动脉旁路移植术后高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 动力学与当前心肌梗死定义的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 15;163:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.09.049. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
3
Gender differences in coronary artery diameters and survival results after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) procedures.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)术后冠状动脉直径和生存结果的性别差异。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 May;13(5):2867-2873. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3356.
4
On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients needing at least two grafts: comparative outcomes at 20 years.需要至少两根移植血管的患者的体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:20年的比较结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;57(3):512-519. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz261.
5
Do women benefit more than men from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术对女性的益处是否大于男性?
Neth Heart J. 2019 Dec;27(12):629-635. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-01333-9.
6
Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center.高容量中心非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45093-3.
7
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:30年的争论
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 21;7(16):e009934. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009934.
8
Mechanisms of red blood cell transfusion-related immunomodulation.红细胞输血相关免疫调节机制。
Transfusion. 2018 Mar;58(3):804-815. doi: 10.1111/trf.14488. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
9
Comparison of Outcomes for Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Low-Volume and High-Volume Centers and by Low-Volume and High-Volume Surgeons.低手术量和高手术量中心以及低手术量和高手术量外科医生进行非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;121(5):552-557. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.035. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
On- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for octogenarians: A meta-analysis of comparative studies involving 27,623 patients.行或不行体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗 80 岁以上患者:涉及 27623 例患者的比较研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Nov;47:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.054. Epub 2017 Sep 22.