• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高容量中心非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果。

Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center.

机构信息

Department for Cardiac surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Koste Todorovica 8, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive care, Clinical Center of Serbia, Koste Todorovica 8, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45093-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-45093-3
PMID:31189989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6561934/
Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the most frequent surgery in the practice of an adult cardiac surgeon and the most frequently performed cardiac surgical procedure worldwide. Despite the ongoing debates regarding the superiority or inferiority of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, it still comprises 15-30% of all CABG cases varying in different national registries. We performed a propensity matched study of 302 consecutive CABG patients,143 off -pump cases performed by the four experienced off-pump surgeons and the on-pump CABG cases performed by those surgeons and four other experienced coronary surgeons. The five year follow up was performed and data collected comprised of mortality, rehospitalization due to cardiac origin, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident. Overall, the off-pump group of patients had a higher risk profile than the patients in the on-pump group. After matching, fewer differences were found between the groups. Propensity score matching analysis showed no difference in long-term survival as well as MACCE and repeated revascularization. The higher risk profile of the patients subjected to OPCAB and the comparable survival to lower risk CPB patients in this series indicate that in experienced hands, OPCAB is a valuable option in this important subgroup of patients.

摘要

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)仍然是成人心脏外科医生实践中最常见的手术,也是全球最常进行的心脏外科手术。尽管关于非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的优越性或劣性仍在争论中,但它仍然占所有 CABG 病例的 15-30%,在不同的国家注册中心有所不同。我们对 302 例连续 CABG 患者进行了倾向评分匹配研究,其中 143 例非体外循环 CABG 由 4 名经验丰富的非体外循环外科医生进行,体外循环 CABG 由这些外科医生和其他 4 名经验丰富的冠状动脉外科医生进行。进行了 5 年的随访,并收集了死亡率、因心脏原因再次住院、再次血运重建、心肌梗死和脑血管意外的数据。总的来说,非体外循环组患者的风险状况高于体外循环组患者。匹配后,两组之间的差异较小。倾向评分匹配分析显示,长期生存率以及 MACCE 和再次血运重建无差异。在本系列中,接受 OPCAB 的患者风险状况较高,与低风险 CPB 患者的生存情况相当,这表明在有经验的医生手中,OPCAB 是该重要亚组患者的一个有价值的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/d69986e9b758/41598_2019_45093_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/918f59610993/41598_2019_45093_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/d3406317bad9/41598_2019_45093_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/d69986e9b758/41598_2019_45093_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/918f59610993/41598_2019_45093_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/d3406317bad9/41598_2019_45093_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b8/6561934/d69986e9b758/41598_2019_45093_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center.高容量中心非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45093-3.
2
Long-Term Survival and Freedom From Reintervention After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity-Matched Study.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期生存和免于再次介入治疗:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Circulation. 2016 Oct 25;134(17):1209-1220. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021933.
3
Association of incomplete revascularization with long-term survival after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后不完全血运重建与长期生存的关系。
J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
4
Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Multiple Coronary Artery Disease Compared with On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Korean National Cohort Study.多支冠状动脉疾病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的现状比较:韩国全国队列研究
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;66(6):470-476. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651516. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Long-Term Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons.经验丰富的外科医生施行非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 25;72(13):1478-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.029.
6
Comparison between off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term results of a real-world registry.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:真实世界注册研究的长期结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;50(3):528-35. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw128. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass results in a more complete revascularization when compared to off-pump grafting.与非体外循环旁路移植相比,微创体外循环心脏不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植可实现更完全的血运重建。
Artif Organs. 2010 Mar;34(3):179-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00836.x.
8
Anaortic off-pump versus clampless off-pump using the PAS-Port device versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: mid-term results from a matched propensity score analysis of 5422 unselected patients.非体外循环主动脉根部无接触与 PAS-Port 装置无接触非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:5422 例未经选择患者倾向性评分匹配分析的中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):760-767. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx235.
9
On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients needing at least two grafts: comparative outcomes at 20 years.需要至少两根移植血管的患者的体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:20年的比较结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;57(3):512-519. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz261.
10
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery have a beneficial effect on long-term mortality and morbidity compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery?与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术对长期死亡率和发病率有有益影响吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):149-59. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu075. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Factors Affecting Survival Rate in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Using Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Review.使用机器学习方法预测接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者生存率的影响因素:一项系统评价
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;8(1):e70336. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70336. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Off-pump CABG surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a single-center prospective registry.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:一项单中心前瞻性注册研究。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;39(5):446-452. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01526-3. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump or on-pump: another brick in the wall.非体外循环或体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:墙上的又一块砖。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Apr;5(7):168. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.52.
2
Comparison of Mid-Term Graft Patency between On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中期移植血管通畅率的比较
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun 20;23(3):141-148. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00302. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
3
Long-Term Survival and Freedom From Reintervention After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Predicting Determinants for Conversion of Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization to On-Pump Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.
非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建转换为体外循环手术的预测因素:一项回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 21;15(7):e42258. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42258. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Rapid cardiac ischemia detection with an epicardial graphene probe.使用心外膜石墨烯探头快速检测心脏缺血
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 22;10:1111651. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1111651. eCollection 2023.
5
Retrospective observational analysis of a coronary artery bypass grafting surgery patient cohort: Off-pump versus on-pump.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者队列的回顾性观察分析:非体外循环与体外循环对比
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Nov 9;84:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104812. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Vasoactive inotropic score as a predictor of long-term mortality in patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.血管活性正性肌力评分预测不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的长期死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12863. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16900-1.
7
Sex and age difference in risk factor distribution, trend, and long-term outcome of patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.性别和年龄对行单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的危险因素分布、趋势和长期预后的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02273-2.
8
A Risk Score for Predicting Long-Term Mortality Following Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.预测非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期死亡率的风险评分
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 7;10(14):3032. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143032.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期生存和免于再次介入治疗:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Circulation. 2016 Oct 25;134(17):1209-1220. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021933.
4
Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2359-2368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
5
On- vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:201-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.250. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
6
Is off-pump technique a safer procedure for coronary revascularization? A propensity score analysis of 20 years of experience.非体外循环技术用于冠状动脉血运重建是否更安全?一项基于20年经验的倾向评分分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 May;22(5):612-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw005. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials†.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的当前证据:一项对超过16900例患者进行随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Apr;49(4):1031-41; discussion 1041. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv268. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
8
Off-pump coronary artery bypass reduces early stroke in octogenarians: a meta-analysis of 18,000 patients.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术可降低八旬老人早期卒中风险:一项纳入18000例患者的荟萃分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 May;99(5):1568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.057. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
9
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Worse long-term survival after off-pump than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后的长期生存率低于体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1820-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 May 21.