• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断研究评估一种新型尿液抗原检测方法的性能- 2014-2017 年奥地利三家转诊大学医院的全国性研究。

Diagnostic Study to Assess the Performance of a New Urinary Antigen Test-A National Study in Three Referral University Hospitals in Austria during 2014-2017.

机构信息

Institute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Währingerstrasse 25a, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416705.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192416705
PMID:36554585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9779764/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the performance of a rapid diagnostic antigen test (Coris) as an index test versus the urinary Antigen ELISA (Bartels) as the reference test.

METHODS

Prospective diagnostic accuracy study (2014-2017) at three university hospitals in Austria.

RESULTS

A total of 996 patients were included in the study. Legionellosis was diagnosed in 49/996 (4.9%) using the reference test. The sensitivity and specificity of the Coris test were 75.5% (95% CI 61.1-86.7%) and 100% (95%CI 99.6-100%), respectively. The PPV was 100% and when using the lower 95% CI limit of the estimate for sensitivity, the resulting PPV was 61.1%. The NPV was 98.7% and the accuracy was 98.8%. The index test showed a PPV > 97% during the period of summer and autumn (May through November) and ≥88% during winter (December through February). The NPV was >97% during all of the periods. The median of the monthly incidence in the general population was 0.1 per 100,000 (IQR 0.1; 0.3).

CONCLUSION

The new rapid test gave a high level of diagnostic accuracy in a rapid fashion. The test can be applied at the bedside by non-laboratory staff.

摘要

背景

我们评估了一种快速诊断抗原检测(Coris)作为指标检测与尿抗原 ELISA(Bartels)作为参考检测的性能。

方法

在奥地利的三家大学医院进行了前瞻性诊断准确性研究(2014-2017 年)。

结果

共有 996 例患者纳入本研究。使用参考检测,军团病的诊断率为 49/996(4.9%)。Coris 试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为 75.5%(95%CI 61.1-86.7%)和 100%(95%CI 99.6-100%)。PPV 为 100%,当使用灵敏度估计值的较低 95%CI 限时,PPV 为 61.1%。NPV 为 98.7%,准确性为 98.8%。在夏季和秋季(5 月至 11 月)期间,该指标检测的 PPV >97%,冬季(12 月至 2 月)期间≥88%。在所有时间段,NPV >97%。普通人群中每月的发病率中位数为每 10 万人 0.1 例(IQR 0.1;0.3)。

结论

新型快速检测以快速的方式提供了高度的诊断准确性。该检测可由非实验室人员在床边进行应用。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Study to Assess the Performance of a New Urinary Antigen Test-A National Study in Three Referral University Hospitals in Austria during 2014-2017.诊断研究评估一种新型尿液抗原检测方法的性能- 2014-2017 年奥地利三家转诊大学医院的全国性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416705.
2
Comparison of the Binax Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the Biotest Legionella Urin antigen EIA for detection of Legionella antigen in both concentrated and nonconcentrated urine samples.将Binax军团菌尿抗原酶免疫测定法(EIA)与Biotest军团菌尿抗原EIA进行比较,以检测浓缩和未浓缩尿液样本中的军团菌抗原。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2718-22. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2718-2722.1998.
3
[Evaluation of a new ELISA (Bartels) for detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine].[评估一种用于检测尿液中嗜肺军团菌抗原的新型酶联免疫吸附测定法(巴特尔氏法)]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2002 Mar;20(3):106-9. doi: 10.1016/s0213-005x(02)72758-4.
4
Systematic review and metaanalysis: urinary antigen tests for Legionellosis.系统评价与荟萃分析:军团病的尿抗原检测
Chest. 2009 Dec;136(6):1576-1585. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2602. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for legionellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.尿路感染症病原体检测试剂盒诊断尿路感染症的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Respir Investig. 2022 Mar;60(2):205-214. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Comparison of three Legionella urinary antigen assays during an outbreak of legionellosis in Belgium.
J Med Microbiol. 2005 Dec;54(Pt 12):1213-1216. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45909-0.
7
Evaluation of the Bartels Legionella Urinary Antigen enzyme immunoassay.巴特尔氏军团菌尿抗原酶免疫测定法的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Oct;20(10):738-40. doi: 10.1007/s100960100598.
8
Evaluation of a Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassay for rapid detection of Legionella pneumophila in water samples.用于快速检测水样中嗜肺军团菌的军团菌尿抗原酶免疫测定法的评估。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2008 Mar;211(1-2):168-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
9
Comparison of the sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen EIA kits from Binax and Biotest with urine from patients with infections caused by less common serogroups and subgroups of Legionella.对Binax和Biotest公司的嗜肺军团菌尿抗原酶免疫分析试剂盒,采用感染由嗜肺军团菌较不常见血清型和亚群引起的患者的尿液进行敏感性比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jul;28(7):817-20. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0697-x. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
10
Evaluation of diagnostic strategies for bladder cancer using computed tomography (CT) urography, flexible cystoscopy and voided urine cytology: results for 778 patients from a hospital haematuria clinic.使用计算机断层扫描(CT)尿路造影、软性膀胱镜检查和尿液细胞学检查评估膀胱癌的诊断策略:来自医院血尿诊所的 778 例患者的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):84-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10664.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering Gaps in Knowledge: A Survey of Belgian General Practitioners' Awareness of Legionnaires' Disease Diagnostic Testing.揭示知识差距:对比利时全科医生对军团病诊断检测认知的调查
Infect Dis Rep. 2024 Aug 27;16(5):820-827. doi: 10.3390/idr16050063.
2
Rapid Antigen Tests during the COVID-19 Era in Korea and Their Implementation as a Detection Tool for Other Infectious Diseases.韩国新冠疫情时期的快速抗原检测及其作为其他传染病检测工具的应用
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;10(3):322. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030322.

本文引用的文献

1
Legionnaires' Disease: State of the Art Knowledge of Pathogenesis Mechanisms of .军团病:发病机制的最新知识。
Annu Rev Pathol. 2020 Jan 24;15:439-466. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032742. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
2
Rational use of diagnostic tests for clinical decision making.合理使用诊断测试以进行临床决策。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Mar;65(3):452-459. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.452. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Urinary antigen testing in community-acquired pneumonia in adults: an update.成人社区获得性肺炎的尿抗原检测:更新。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019 Feb;17(2):107-115. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1565994. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Legionella urinary antigen test -a contribute towards a more rational use.军团菌尿抗原检测——有助于更合理地使用。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Jan;59:e20-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
How to: evaluate a diagnostic test.如何评估诊断性试验。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jan;25(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Weather-Dependent Risk for Legionnaires' Disease, United States.与天气相关的军团病风险,美国。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;23(11):1843-1851. doi: 10.3201/eid2311.170137.
7
Clinical presentation of Legionella pneumonia: Evaluation of clinical scoring systems and therapeutic efficacy.军团菌肺炎的临床表现:临床评分系统及治疗效果评估
J Infect Chemother. 2017 Nov;23(11):727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
8
Evaluation and Comparison of Multiple Test Methods, Including Real-time PCR, for Legionella Detection in Clinical Specimens.评价和比较多种检测方法,包括实时 PCR,用于临床标本中军团菌的检测。
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 31;4:175. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00175. eCollection 2016.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of PCR Alone and Compared to Urinary Antigen Testing for Detection of Legionella spp.: a Systematic Review.单独使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)以及与尿抗原检测相比检测嗜肺军团菌属的诊断准确性:一项系统评价
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Feb;54(2):401-11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02675-15. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Community-acquired pneumonia: An overview.社区获得性肺炎:概述
Postgrad Med. 2015 Aug;127(6):607-15. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.1074030.