Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Mar;67(3):264-276. doi: 10.1111/aas.14186. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
Low-serum levels of magnesium, phosphate, and zinc are observed in many intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but clinical equipoise exists regarding supplementation strategies. We aimed to assess the desirable and undesirable effects of supplementation with magnesium, phosphate, or zinc in adult ICU patients.
We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of supplementation with magnesium, phosphate, or zinc in adult ICU patients. Primary outcomes were mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation. We registered the protocol, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement, used the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool, and the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence.
We identified no low risk of bias trials. For magnesium supplementation, we included three trials (n = 235); the relative risk (RR) for mortality was 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.96 compared to no supplementation (very low certainty of evidence). For zinc supplementation, two trials were included (n = 168); the RR for mortality was 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.28 compared to control. No trials assessed the effects of phosphate supplementation on mortality. For outcomes other than mortality, only zero or one trial was available.
In adult ICU patients, the certainty of evidence for the effects of supplementation with magnesium, phosphate, or zinc was very low. High-quality trials are needed to assess the value of supplementation strategies in these patients.
许多重症监护病房(ICU)患者的血清镁、磷和锌水平较低,但补充策略的临床平衡存在。我们旨在评估补充镁、磷或锌对成年 ICU 患者的理想和不理想影响。
我们对评估成年 ICU 患者补充镁、磷或锌效果的随机临床试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。主要结局是死亡率和机械通气时间。我们注册了方案,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目,使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚 2 工具,以及评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法来评估证据的确定性。
我们没有发现低偏倚风险的试验。对于镁补充,我们纳入了三项试验(n=235);与不补充相比,死亡率的相对风险(RR)为 0.54,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.30-0.96(证据确定性非常低)。对于锌补充,纳入了两项试验(n=168);与对照组相比,死亡率的 RR 为 0.73,95%CI 为 0.41-1.28。没有试验评估磷酸盐补充对死亡率的影响。对于除死亡率以外的其他结局,只有零项或一项试验可用。
在成年 ICU 患者中,补充镁、磷或锌的效果的证据确定性非常低。需要高质量的试验来评估这些患者补充策略的价值。