• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射科医生对前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分的时间变化及其与前列腺癌根治术病理结果的相关性。

Temporal changes of PIRADS scoring by radiologists and correlation to radical prostatectomy pathological outcomes.

作者信息

Hong Sung Kyu, Song Sang Hun, Kim Hak Ju, Lee Hae Sung, Nam Jun Hyun, Lee Seung Bae

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Prostate Int. 2022 Dec;10(4):188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.001
PMID:36570646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9747593/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess temporal improvement of prostate image reporting and data system (PIRADS) 3-5 lesion correlation to histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1481 patients who underwent RP for biopsy-proven PCa between 2015 and 2019 were divided into 14 groups of 100 sequential readings for the evaluation of histopathological correlation with PIRADS readings. Temporal trends of PIRADS distribution and predictive performance for RP pathology were evaluated to assess underlying changes in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation by radiologists.

RESULTS

PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly correlated with the increasing rates of Gleason Group (GG) upgrade (p = 0.044) and decreasing rate of GG downgrade (p = 0.016) over time. PIRADS ≥3 lesions read after median 2 years of experience were shown to independently predict intermediate-high-risk (GG ≥ 3) PCa (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.00-8.54; = 0.049) in RP pathology. Preoperative GG ≥ 3 biopsy lesions with PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly more susceptible to GG upgrade (= 0.035) and GG ≥ 4 RP pathology (p = 0.003) in experienced reads, in contrast to insignificant findings in early readings (p = 0.588 and 0.248, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRI reports matched with RP pathology suggest an improved prediction of adverse pathology in PIRADS 3-5 lesions over time, suggesting a temporal change in PIRADS interpretation and predictive accuracy. Institutions with low volume experience should use caution in solely relying on MRI for predicting tumor characteristics. Future prospective trials and larger scale assessments are required to further validate our results.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)3 - 5级病变与前列腺癌(PCa)根治性前列腺切除术(RP)组织病理学结果的时间相关性。

材料与方法

2015年至2019年间,共有1481例经活检证实为PCa并接受RP的患者被分为14组,每组100次连续读数,以评估与PIRADS读数的组织病理学相关性。评估PIRADS分布的时间趋势以及RP病理的预测性能,以评估放射科医生对前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)解读的潜在变化。

结果

随着时间的推移,PIRADS 4 - 5级病变与Gleason分级组(GG)升级率增加(p = 0.044)和GG降级率降低(p = 0.016)显著相关。在有中位数2年经验后读取的PIRADS≥3级病变被证明可独立预测RP病理中的中高危(GG≥3)PCa(优势比2.93,95%置信区间1.00 - 8.54;p = 0.049)。在经验丰富的读数中,术前GG≥3活检病变伴有PIRADS 4 - 5级病变更易发生GG升级(p = 0.035)和GG≥4的RP病理(p = 0.003),而在早期读数中结果不显著(分别为p = 0.588和0.248)。

结论

术前MRI报告与RP病理相匹配表明,随着时间的推移,PIRADS 3 - 5级病变对不良病理的预测有所改善,提示PIRADS解读和预测准确性存在时间变化。经验较少的机构在仅依靠MRI预测肿瘤特征时应谨慎。未来需要进行前瞻性试验和更大规模的评估以进一步验证我们的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/06dd51a9d09d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/6f2971052699/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/a76c94f1ce64/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/06dd51a9d09d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/6f2971052699/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/a76c94f1ce64/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a610/9747593/06dd51a9d09d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal changes of PIRADS scoring by radiologists and correlation to radical prostatectomy pathological outcomes.放射科医生对前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分的时间变化及其与前列腺癌根治术病理结果的相关性。
Prostate Int. 2022 Dec;10(4):188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
3
Correlation of Prostate-Imaging Reporting and Data Scoring System scoring on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging with histopathological factors in radical prostatectomy material in Turkish prostate cancer patients: a multicenter study of the Urooncology Association.土耳其前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除标本中多参数前列腺磁共振成像的前列腺影像报告和数据评分系统评分与组织病理学因素的相关性:泌尿肿瘤学协会的多中心研究
Prostate Int. 2020 Mar;8(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
4
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists.前列腺磁共振成像解读在放射科医生之间存在很大差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.前列腺健康指数在预测前列腺根治性切除术后 Gleason 评分升级和高危前列腺癌中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 31;11(1):17447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96993-2.
6
Combined Systematic and MRI-US Fusion Prostate Biopsy Has the Highest Grading Accuracy When Compared to Final Pathology.与最终病理相比,联合系统和 MRI-US 融合前列腺活检具有最高的分级准确性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 22;57(6):519. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060519.
7
Performance of multiparametric MRI appears better when measured in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy.在接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中进行测量时,多参数磁共振成像的表现似乎更好。
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Nov 22;10:233-235. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S178064. eCollection 2018.
8
How does a prebiopsy mri approach for prostate cancer diagnosis affect prostatectomy upgrade rates?前列腺癌诊断的活检前 MRI 方法如何影响前列腺切除术的升级率?
Urol Oncol. 2021 Nov;39(11):784.e11-784.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Identify Aggressive Prostate Cancer at the Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Level.多参数磁共振成像特征可在表型和转录组水平识别侵袭性前列腺癌。
J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1241-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.041. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Diagnostic ability of Ga-68 PSMA PET to detect dominant and non-dominant tumors, upgrading and adverse pathology in patients with PIRADS 4-5 index lesions undergoing radical prostatectomy.镓-68 PSMA PET 对行根治性前列腺切除术的 PIRADS 4-5 指数病变患者中显性和非显性肿瘤、升级和不良病理的诊断能力。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Mar;24(1):202-209. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00270-8. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Treatment Imaging in Focal Therapy: Understanding TARGET and PI-FAB Scoring Systems.聚焦治疗后的影像学检查:了解TARGET和PI-FAB评分系统。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 26;15(11):1328. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111328.
2
Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study.磁共振成像阴性不能用于省略初次前列腺活检——一项前后瞻性研究。
Prostate Int. 2024 Sep;12(3):128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Effects of bladder neck sparing on continence outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and metaanalysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical experience with active surveillance protocol using regular magnetic resonance imaging instead of regular repeat biopsy for monitoring: A study at a high-volume center in Korea.使用定期磁共振成像而非定期重复活检进行监测的主动监测方案的临床经验:韩国一家大型中心的研究。
Prostate Int. 2021 Jun;9(2):90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
2
Analyzing the learning curves of a novice and an experienced urologist for transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.分析新手和经验丰富的泌尿科医生进行经直肠磁共振成像-超声融合前列腺活检的学习曲线。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):1956-1965. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-8.
3
保留膀胱颈对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术控尿结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Prostate Int. 2024 Dec;12(4):179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.004. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Refining clinically relevant cut-offs of prostate specific antigen density for risk stratification in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.优化前列腺特异性抗原密度的临床相关临界值,用于PI-RADS 3类病变患者的风险分层。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Mar;28(1):173-179. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00872-6. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Propensity score matched analysis of functional outcome in five thousand cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus high-intensity focused ultrasound.五千例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与高强度聚焦超声治疗功能结局的倾向评分匹配分析
Prostate Int. 2024 Jun;12(2):104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
Is the Ellipsoid Formula Reliable in Prostate MRI?椭球体公式在前列腺MRI中是否可靠?
Curr Health Sci J. 2023 Oct-Dec;49(4):530-535. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.8. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
7
Prognosis after radical prostatectomy in men older than 75 years: long-term results from a single tertiary center.75岁以上男性根治性前列腺切除术后的预后:来自单一三级中心的长期结果。
Prostate Int. 2024 Mar;12(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Targeted by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Fusion.磁共振成像认知融合引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 8;13(8):1373. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081373.
Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: detection of clinically significant cancer in a perfect match group.
前列腺双参数与多参数磁共振成像:在完美匹配组中检测临床显著性癌症
Prostate Int. 2020 Dec;8(4):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
A single-center long-term experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: 15 years of follow-up.单中心前列腺癌主动监测的长期经验:15 年随访。
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Jan;62(1):32-38. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200206. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
5
Correlation of Prostate-Imaging Reporting and Data Scoring System scoring on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging with histopathological factors in radical prostatectomy material in Turkish prostate cancer patients: a multicenter study of the Urooncology Association.土耳其前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除标本中多参数前列腺磁共振成像的前列腺影像报告和数据评分系统评分与组织病理学因素的相关性:泌尿肿瘤学协会的多中心研究
Prostate Int. 2020 Mar;8(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
6
Interreader Variability of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 in Detecting and Assessing Prostate Cancer Lesions at Prostate MRI.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版在前列腺MRI检测和评估前列腺癌病灶中的阅片者间变异性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jun;212(6):1197-1205. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20536. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版 2019 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Comparison of PIRADS 3 lesions with histopathological findings after MRI-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in a real world-setting.在真实临床环境中,对前列腺MRI融合靶向活检后PIRADS 3类病变与组织病理学结果的比较。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(2):165-170. doi: 10.3233/CH-189407.
9
The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.FUTURE 试验:一项基于磁共振成像的靶向活检技术在既往阴性前列腺穿刺活检患者中诊断前列腺癌的多中心随机对照研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.在初次活检的患者中,根据 PSA 水平比较 TRUS 引导下活检与 MRI 靶向活检的癌症检出率:倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.