• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对准机制:共享控制、社会认知和元认知。

Mechanisms of alignment: shared control, social cognition and metacognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.

Department of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 9YR, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210362. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0362. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2021.0362
PMID:36571124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9791477/
Abstract

In dialogue, speakers process a great deal of information, take and give the floor to each other, and plan and adjust their contributions on the fly. Despite the level of coordination and control that it requires, dialogue is the easiest way speakers possess to come to similar conceptualizations of the world. In this paper, we show how speakers align with each other by mutually controlling the flow of the dialogue and constantly monitoring their own and their interlocutors' way of representing information. Through examples of conversation, we introduce the notions of shared control, meta-representations of alignment and commentaries on alignment, and show how they support mutual understanding and the collaborative creation of abstract concepts. Indeed, whereas speakers can share similar representations of concrete concepts just by mutually attending to a tangible referent or by recalling it, they are likely to need more negotiation and mutual monitoring to build similar representations of abstract concepts. This article is part of the theme issue 'Concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences'.

摘要

在对话中,说话者处理大量信息,相互插话,即时计划和调整自己的发言。尽管对话需要协调和控制,但它是说话者最容易达成对世界相似概念的方式。在本文中,我们通过展示说话者如何通过相互控制对话的流程并不断监测自己和对话者的信息表示方式来实现彼此协调。通过对话的例子,我们引入了共享控制、对齐的元表示和对齐的评论等概念,并展示了它们如何支持相互理解和抽象概念的协作创建。事实上,虽然说话者可以通过相互关注一个有形的指涉物或回忆它来共享具体概念的相似表示,但他们可能需要更多的协商和相互监控来构建抽象概念的相似表示。本文是主题为“互动中的概念:社会参与和内在体验”的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91e/9791477/299532b5ed87/rstb20210362f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91e/9791477/c831a7eb52c4/rstb20210362f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91e/9791477/299532b5ed87/rstb20210362f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91e/9791477/c831a7eb52c4/rstb20210362f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91e/9791477/299532b5ed87/rstb20210362f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of alignment: shared control, social cognition and metacognition.对准机制:共享控制、社会认知和元认知。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210362. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0362. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
2
Editorial concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences.互动中的编辑理念:社会参与和内心体验。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210351. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0351. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
3
Concepts, abstractness and inner speech.概念、抽象和内部言语。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210371. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0371. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain.抽象概念的多样性:大脑中的发展、使用和表现。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0121.
5
Metacognition and abstract concepts.元认知与抽象概念。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0133.
6
Olfactory abstraction: a communicative and metacognitive account.嗅觉抽象:一种交际和元认知的解释。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210369. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0369. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
7
Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts.语言有重量:语言作为内在基础和抽象概念灵活性的来源。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2451-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6.
8
Abstract concepts, language and sociality: from acquisition to inner speech.抽象概念、语言和社会性:从习得到内部言语。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0134.
9
Rethinking the role of language in embodied cognition.重新思考语言在具身认知中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210375. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0375. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
Is love an abstract concept? A view of concepts from an interaction-based perspective.爱是一个抽象概念吗?基于互动视角的概念观点。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210356. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0356. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Large Language Models Simulate Spoken Human Conversations?大语言模型能模拟人类对话吗?
Cogn Sci. 2025 Sep;49(9):e70106. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70106.
2
Abstract word dropout and cross-speaker misalignment of word concreteness are features of conversation in aging.摘要词脱落以及词具体性在不同说话者之间的错位是老年人对话的特征。
Cortex. 2025 Jul 23;190:286-303. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.07.003.
3
Effects of multilevel metacognition on group performance and regulation in collaborative learning.多层次元认知对合作学习中小组表现及调控的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the interplay of conversational devices in building mutual understanding.量化对话手段在建立相互理解过程中的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):864-889. doi: 10.1037/xge0001301. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Experimental evidence for scale-induced category convergence across populations.群体间因规模而导致的范畴趋同的实验证据。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):327. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20037-y.
3
Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts.语言有重量:语言作为内在基础和抽象概念灵活性的来源。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 29;15:1419408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419408. eCollection 2024.
4
Progressing the Development of a Collaborative Metareasoning Framework: Prospects and Challenges.推进协作元推理框架的发展:前景与挑战。
J Intell. 2024 Mar 1;12(3):28. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030028.
5
Editorial concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences.互动中的编辑理念:社会参与和内心体验。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210351. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0351. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
6
Concepts, abstractness and inner speech.概念、抽象和内部言语。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210371. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0371. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2451-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6.
4
Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.言语即社会工具:语言、社会性与抽象概念的内在基础
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Jul;29:120-153. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Metacognition and abstract concepts.元认知与抽象概念。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0133.
6
Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition.修复:交互与认知的接口。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):279-313. doi: 10.1111/tops.12339.
7
The challenge of abstract concepts.抽象概念的挑战。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):263-292. doi: 10.1037/bul0000089. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
8
Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.修复沟通问题的通用原则。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0136100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136100. eCollection 2015.
9
Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition.超个人认知控制与元认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Is "huh?" a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items.“嗯?”是一个通用词吗?会话结构与语言项的趋同进化
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e78273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. eCollection 2013.