Babamiri Mohammad, Heydari Bahareh, Mortezapour Alireza, Tamadon Tahmineh M
Department of Ergonomics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Saf Health Work. 2022 Dec;13(4):469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Nowadays, counter-productive work behaviors (CWBs) have turned into a common and costly position for many organizations and especially health centers. Therefore, the study was carried out to examine and compare the demand-control-support (DCS) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) models as predictors of CWBs.
The study was cross-sectional. The population was all nurses working in public hospitals in Hamadan, Iran of whom 320 were selected as the sample based on simple random sampling method. The instruments used were Job Content Questionnaire, Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, and Counterproductivity Work Behavior Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using correlation and regression analysis in SPSS18.
The findings indicated that both ERI and DCS models could predict CWB ( ≤ 0.05); however, the DCS model variables can explain the variance of CWB-I and CWB-O approximately 8% more than the ERI model variables and have more power in predicting these behaviors in the nursing community.
According to the results, job stress is a key factor in the incidence of CWBs among nurses. Considering the importance and impact of each component of ERI and DCS models in the occurrence of CWBs, corrective actions can be taken to reduce their incidence in nurses.
如今,反生产工作行为(CWBs)已成为许多组织尤其是健康中心普遍存在且代价高昂的问题。因此,开展本研究以检验和比较作为CWBs预测因素的需求-控制-支持(DCS)模型和努力-回报失衡(ERI)模型。
本研究为横断面研究。研究对象为伊朗哈马丹公立医院的所有护士,基于简单随机抽样方法从中选取320名作为样本。所使用的工具包括工作内容问卷、努力-回报失衡问卷和反生产工作行为问卷。在SPSS18中使用相关性和回归分析对数据进行分析。
研究结果表明,ERI模型和DCS模型均可预测CWBs(P≤0.05);然而,DCS模型变量对CWBs-I和CWBs-O方差的解释比ERI模型变量多约8%,且在预测护士群体中的这些行为方面具有更强的能力。
根据研究结果,工作压力是护士群体中发生CWBs的关键因素。鉴于ERI模型和DCS模型各组成部分在CWBs发生中的重要性和影响,可采取纠正措施以降低护士群体中CWBs的发生率。